4.4 Analysis of Questionnaire
In order to support the primary data on students‟ improvement in learning descriptive text, the questionnaires were given to the studentsin the end of the
research. There were ten questions that should be answered and the result of the questionnaire was as follows.
1 The first question was whether the students liked learning English or not,
the result of this question was 2,71. It showed that students‟ interest in learning English is high.
2 The second question was whether the students liked learning guided
writing in English or not, the result of this question was 2,48. It showed that the students‟ interest in learning writing also high enough. However,
there were still a few of them who had low interest in writing. Moreover, it
1 2
3 4
5 Respect
Enthusiasm Responsibility
Confidence Communication
Cycle 2 Cycle 1
needed to be increased in order to improve the students‟ guided writing ability.
3 The third question was whether the students had mastered writing or not.
The answer for this number was 1,45, it means that the students ability was medium.
4 The fourth question was whether the teacher had used the strategy and the
answer was 2,39. It means that the teacher ever used strategy in teaching writing.
5 The fifth question was whether the students were willing for the use of
strategy in learning about writing. The result was 2,77. It meant that almost all of the students were willing to have strategy in their writing
class. 6
The sixth question was about the students‟ interest in the use of write- around as strategy in writing activity. The result was 2,74. It meant that the
students‟ interest toward these strategy was high. 7
The seventh question was whether the use of write-around helped students in learning writing, the result for this question was 2,48. It meant that the
use of write- around in students‟ opinion was very helpful in learning
writing. 8
The eighth question was whether the students‟ like and interest in learning writing increased or not. The result of this question was 2,84, it meant that
their interest highly increased in learning writing.
9 The ninth question was about the students‟ achievement, whether it
increased or not after they had been treated by using write-around as strategy. The result
was 2,74, it meant that the students‟ achievement increased.
10 The last question was about the sustainability of write-around as strategy
in writing class. It asked whether the use of this strategy should be continued or not in learning writing in English. The result for this question
was 2,81. It showed that the continuity of using write-around as strategy in writing class was very necessary.
From the result of first questionnaire, it could be concluded that the students‟ attitude toward the learning English, especially in writing was quite good.
Then, the use of write-around strategy in teaching writing was needed to improve the students‟ writing skill.
4.5 Analysis of Interview