Ʃ� M :
N
Explanation : M : mean score
Σ x : the total score N : the number of sample
3.5.2. Procedure of Analyzing Observation Checklist
The observation checklist were analyzed by the result of the criteria on the observation checklists. The indicators observed showed the positive behaviour
during learning process by using write-around. They were respect, enthusiasm, responsibility, confidence, and communication in doing the assignments and tasks
in the class. The result described about the students‟ attitude during the teaching and learning process. It was used to support the data and to answer whether write-
around can be used in teaching writing. The observation checklist was analyzed through the following steps:
1 determined students‟ checklist point using the table below:
Table 3.3 Checklist Point of the Students
No Code
Indicators and Scores
Respect Enthusiastic
Responsibility Convidence
Communicative
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
1 G-1
... ...
31 G-31
Total Point
2 finding the mean point of each indicator using the following formula:
;
where, M
= mean point, = total point,
n = number of the students;
3 matching the mean of each indicator to the criteria below:
Table 3.4 The Criterion of Observation Checklist Assessment
Range of Mean Indicator
1.0-2.0 Poor
2.1-3.0 Average
3.1-4.0 Good
4.1-5.0 Excellent
3.5.3. Procedure of Analyzing Questionnaire
The questionnaire was analyzed by the result of students‟ answers. Because the questionaire was closed questionnaire, the analysis the questionnaire was based on
the most answers made by the students.
In analyzing questionnaire, some steps were taken, firstly, the items were graded. For the answer yes, itwould be given score 3,
for the answer doubt , it would be given 2, and for the answer no, the score was 1. Then, I tabulated the data and calculated the mean. the calculation of the mean was
by using formula:
Then, I matched the mean to the criterion given by Heaton 1975:172. The criterion was as follows :
Table 3.5 Mean Criterion of Questionnaires by Heaton
Range of Mean
Students‟ Interest
The Advantage
Students‟ Achievement
The Relevancy
Sustainability 0,00-1.00
Low Not
Helpful Low
Not Relevant
Not Necessary
1,01-2,00
Medium Helpful
Medium Relevant
Necessary
2,01-3,00
High Very
Helpful High
Very Relevant
Very Necessary
3.5.4. Procedure of Analyzing Interview
Kategori