29
specific subject. Therefore, the researcher collected the data form the respondents to obtain information.
B. Research Participants
The participants investigated and the sources of data in this research were the sixth semester students who are taking Microteaching course in the academic
year of 20102011 at the English Education Study Program, Sanata Dharma University. There were six Microteaching classes in English education Study
Program. However, the researcher took five students from each class to be the respondents. Therefore, there were 30 students as the participants of the research.
The researcher did not differentiate the students based on their intelligence level, previous achievement, nor any other factors. The students were randomly
selected, so that, it would be clear whether the students had perception on the use of recorded performance to do self-evaluation or not. The only criteria that the
researcher used was the students were those who had practiced teaching for first midterm test and they had watched their recorded teaching performance.
C. Research Instruments
In order to gather the data needed from the students, the researcher employed two types of data gathering instruments. They were questionnaire and
verifying interview. 1.
Questionnaires The questionnaires consisted of two parts. They are close and open ended
questions. The questionnaires were distributed in May 2011. It was already in
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
30
midterm test. Therefore, the participants were supposed to have practiced their microteaching test. They were also supposed to have watched their recorded
performance. The questionnaire was not only used to dig out students’ perception on the use of recorded performance to de self-evaluation. It was also used to find
out how the student teachers evaluate themselves after they watched the video of their teaching performance.
The first part of the questionnaire was close-ended questions. The close- ended questions were used to dig out students perceptions. It consisted of 28
statements related to how the students perceived the use of recorded performance to do self-reflection.
In giving response to each statement in the questionnaire, the students were asked to put a tick in the provided column. Each questionnaire statement consisted
of four columns. The researcher did not use neutral choice to avoid uncertain answer. In order to obtain definite answer, the researcher provided only four
columns. They were strongly agree, agree, disagree and strongly disagree. The second part of the questionnaire was open-ended questions. They
consisted of three questions. The open-ended questions were not only used to find out students’ perception but also what the students evaluated and how the way
they evaluated themselves affected their teaching abilities and teaching performance in Microteaching class.
In answering the questionnaire, the participants were asked to tick the value numbers provided for each statement that is corresponded to their response. The
number was ranked from 1-4. Value number 1 was for strongly disagree, 2 for
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
31
disagree, 3 for agree and 4 for strongly agree. The participants who had good perception on the use of recorded performance to do self-evaluation tent to choose
value number that indicated agree or strongly agree response. 2.
Verifying Interview Verifying interview was conducted after the students watched their own
video of teaching performance and filled the questionnaires. The researcher used seven open-ended questions. They were designed to dig out students’ reason and
to verify their answers related to the questionnaire. The open ended questions were used as there would not be predetermined answers which limit students’
response. 3.
Document Analysis After verifying interview were accomplished, the researcher did document
analysis. The researcher used students’ written reflection to be analyzed. It aimed to help the researcher to find out what the students evaluated in their teaching
practice and how their self-reflection could affect them to set better goal and achievement for their next teaching performance. The result of document analysis
is only to support the result of interview.
D. Data Gathering Technique
Kategori