1. Home
  2. Lainnya

Population and Sample RESEARCH METHOD

8. Analyzing the result of the Test

Both of the pretest and posttest result of the class was analyzed using Repeated Measure T-Test to compare the data average score mean of both pretest and posttest in one sample Hatch and Farhady, 1982:114. It was tested in order to find out whether there was an improvement of students’ reading comprehension achievement after being taught through reciprocal teaching technique.

3.5 Research Schedules

In order to gain the regularity and to avoid irregularity in doing all the research procedures, the researcher made a time schedule for experimental class in one week. Table 2. The Schedule of the Research NO Meeting Type of Action 1. July, 16 th 2013 Administering Try Out 1. July, 23 rd 2013 Administering pre-test 2. July, 24 th 2013 Treatment 1 3. July, 30 th 2013 Treatment 2 4. July, 31 st 2013 Treatment 3 6. August, 6 th 2013 Administering post-test 7. August, 7 th 2013 Administering questionnaire

3.6 Scoring System of Reading Test

In this research, the researcher used Henning’s formula to find out the result of the test, with formula as followed: = 100 Where: PS : percentage score R : the total of right answer N : total item Henning, 1987

3.7 Try Out of Research Instrument

The test was tried out in order to determine the quality of the data collecting instrument, that were its validity, reliability, level of difficulty, and discrimination power. Validity of the test validity of the test is extent to which it measure what it is supposed to measure and nothing else Heaton, 1975:159. To measure whether the test in this had good validity, the researcher used content and construct validity to measure that the test had a good validity.

3.7.1 Validity

Validity of the test is extent to which it measure what it is supposed to measure and nothing else Heaton, 1975:159. Every test should be valid as the constructor can make it. The researcher use content and construct validity to measure that the test has a good validity.

3.7.1.1 Content Validity

According to Heaton 1975:160 content validity is the intended to know whether the test items are good reflection of what will be covered. The test took from the material that have been taught to the students and to know whether the test have a good content validity, the items of the test is discussed with the experts lecture or advisor to measure the degree of agreement.

Dokumen yang terkait

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF LITERATURE CIRCLE TECHNIQUE TO THE EIGHT GRADE STUDENTS OF READING COMPREHENSION IN SMPN 3 BATU

0 3 15

THE EFFECT OF USING RECIPROCAL TEACHING METHOD ON READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT OF THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS AT SMPN 1 KENCONG JEMBER

0 6 14

The Influence Of Reciprocal Teaching Technique Toward Students’ Reading Comprehension

1 44 112

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RECIPROCAL TEACHING TECHNIQUE IN TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 8 METRO

0 10 56

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RECIPROCAL TEACHING TECHNIQUE IN NARRATIVE TEXT TO INCREASE THE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 KALIREJO

0 5 67

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF QUESTIONING TECHNIQUE TO INCREASE THE STUDENTS READING COMPREHENSION ABILITY USING SHORT FUNCTIONAL TEXT AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMPN 2 NATAR

3 6 118

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING AND THEIR READING COMPREHENSION ABILITY AT THE THIRD GRADE OF SMPN 3 NATAR LAMPUNG SELATAN IN 2014/2015 ACADEMIC YEAR

2 9 67

THE USE OF RECIPROCAL TEACHING TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION

1 6 77

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ENGLISH QUESTIONINGIN TEACHING BIOLOGY TO THE THIRD GRADE STUDENTS The Implementation Of English Questioning In Teaching Biology To The Third Grade Students Of RSBI Class At SMP Negeri 3 Sujoharjo.

0 0 12

THE USE OF RECIPROCAL TEACHING PROCEDURE IN TEACHING NARRATIVE TEXTS TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION.

2 4 38