Level of Difficulty Try Out of Research Instrument

computerization i.e. Repeated Measure T-Test of Statistical Package for Social Science SPSS 17.00 for windows to test whether progress of students’ gain was significant or not, in which the significant was determine by p 0.05 Hatch and Farhady, 1982: 114.

3.9 Hypothesis Testing

H : There is no difference of students’ reading comprehension achievement before and after being taught through reciprocal teaching technique. H ı : There is a difference of students’ reading comprehension achievement before and after being taught through reciprocal teaching technique. The hypothesis was analyzed by using Matched T-Test with Statistical Package for Social Science SPSS version 17.00. The level of significant is 0.05, and the probability of error in the hypothesis is 5. The criteria for accepting the hypothesis are as follows: 1. H is accepted if the t-table is higher than t-ratio. It means that there is no significant difference on students’ reading comprehension achievement before and after giving pre questioning, specifically in terms of literal, interpretative and critical comprehension. 2. H is rejected if the t-table is lower than t-ratio. It means that there is significant difference on students’ reading comprehension achievement before and after giving pre questioning, specifically in terms of literal, interpretative and critical comprehension. ✁

V. CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

This chapter describes the conclusion of the result of the data analysis and also the suggestion from the researcher to the other researchers and English teacher who want to try and apply reciprocal teaching technique in teaching reading comprehension.

5.1 Conclusions

In relating to the result of the data analysis and discussion of the research the following conclusions are drawn as follows: 1. There is an improvement of students’ reading comprehension achievement after being treated using reciprocal teaching technique at the third grade of SMPN 2 Natar. This can be seen from the difference of the students’ mean score in pre- test 52.74 to post-test 69.63 with gain 16.89 point. The result of the hypothesis test showed that the hypothesis of this research was accepted p0.05,p=0.000. According to the ✂✄☎ ✄ analysis of the result of pretest and posttest in reading aspect, it showed the improvement of each aspect. From all aspects of reading, it can be concluded that main character got the highest improvement than another aspects.