The Disadvantages of Collaborative Learning
25
3. Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension of Descriptive Text
through Group Work Technique at the First Year of VII-I Class of SMPN 10 Tangerang Selatan. Proposed by Rizki Amelia, 2013.
The aim of this study is to know whether group work can develop students’ reading comprehension of descriptive text through group technique in
the first year of VII-I class of SMPN 10 Tangerang Selatan. The writer used classroom action research method. The writer did this study at the first year of
VII-I class of SMPN 10 Tangerang Selatan that involved 46 students. The writer used observational sheet, interview guideline, and test pre-test and post-test as
the instruments of research. The writer got the result that 80,43 of students can reach values 65 and have achieved the minimum passing criteria KKM. It
concluded that the students’ reading comprehension of descriptive text through
group work technique had improved. Those three studies have the differences with this study. The first study
has the differences with this study in the dependent variable. It has more general dependent variable which is the writer does not mention what kind of text she
chooses and the sample of study is the second grade students of Senior High School. Meanwhile, this study mentions what kind of text descriptive text and
the sample of study is the seventh grade students of Junior High School. The similarities are both of these studies use pre-experimental design as the
quantitative method, test as the instrument of study, and see the effectiveness of collaborative learning in learning reading.
Another study has the difference with this study in the research design. It uses experimental design which takes two classes as the experiment class and the
control class. Meanwhile, this study uses pre-experimental design which takes only one class. The similarities are both of these studies use test as the instrument
of study and see the effectiveness of collaborative learning in learning reading. The last study has the differences with this study in the method and the
aim. It uses classroom action research method and its aim is to improve students’ reading comprehension through group work technique. In contrast, this study uses
pre-experimental design and its aim is to see the effectiveness of collaborative
26
learning in learning reading. The similarities are both of these studies choose descriptive text as the dependent variable and the sample of study is the first grade
students of Junior High School.