Data Collecting Technique Research Instruments

Table 3.1: Need analysis questionnaire Dimensions The purpose of the questions References T ar ge t N e ed s Lacks To find out the gap between learners’ proficiency and the demand of the target situation. Hutchinson and Waters 1987 Wants To find out the learners’ wants in learning writing. Hutchinson and Waters 1987 Dimensions The purpose of the questions References L ear n in g N ee d s Input To find out the suitable input for writing learning materials that students want the most. Nunan 2004 Procedures To find out the suitable procedures that students want the most. Nunan 2004 Setting To find out the desired environment for learning writing. Nunan 2004 Hutchinson and Waters 1987 Teacher’s Role To find out the role of the teacher in the learning process. Nunan 2004 Learner’s Role To find out the role of the learner in the learning process. Nunan 2004 2. Expert Judgment of Materials Questionnaire The expert judgment of materials questionnaire was distributed to the experts after the first draft materials were developed. The purpose of this questionnaire was to know the experts’ opinions and suggestions towards the materials. The organization of the experts’ judgment in terms of materials is presented below adapted from BSNP ’s Instrumen Penilaian Buku Teks Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris SMAMA: Table 3.2: Expert judgment of materials questionnaire No The purpose of the questions References 1 To find out the appropriateness of the content in the materials. BSNP 2 To find out the appropriateness of the language in the materials. BSNP 3 To find out the appropriateness of the materials presentation. BSNP 3. Expert Judgment of Media Questionnaire The expert judgment of materials questionnaire was distributed to the experts after the first draft materials were developed. The purpose of this questionnaire was to know the experts’ opinions and suggestions towards the media. The organization of the experts’ judgment in terms of media is presented below adapted fro m Lever and Duffy’s 2009 Academic Web Evaluation Rubric: Table 3.3: Expert judgment of media questionnaire No The purpose of the questions References 1 To find out the clarity of the goal of the website. Lever and Duffy 2009 2 To find out the clari ty of the website’s information. Lever and Duffy 2009 3 To find out that the website is welcoming and friendly. Lever and Duffy 2009 4 To find out the consistency of the design. Lever and Duffy 2009 5 To find out the organization of the design. Lever and Duffy 2009 6 To find out the clarity of the navigation. Lever and Duffy 2009 7 To find out that the navigation is easy to use. Lever and Duffy 2009 8 To find out the appropriateness of the links. Lever and Duffy 2009 9 To find out that the menu panel is easy to follow. Lever and Duffy 2009 10 To find out the effectiveness of the picture placement. Lever and Duffy 2009 11 To find out the relation between the subject which is taught and the website. Lever and Duffy 2009

F. Data Analysis Technique

There are two kinds of data in this research, i.e. quantitative data and qualitative data. Both data were collected through questionnaires. This research was using two kinds of questionnaires, which were analyzed differently. The data of needs analysis questionnaire were analyzed using percentages. The expert judgment data analysis used frequencies and descriptive statistics. Descriptive statistics according to Brown 2001 referred to a set of procedures that are used to describe or characterize the answers of a group of respondents to numerically coded questions. In this case, central tendency measure was used to analyze the data. The central tendency measure which was used in the research is the mean. In classifying the category of the mean, the theory proposed by Suharto 2006 about quantitative data conversion was used. The conversion was presented in the Table 3.4. Table 3.4: Quantitative data conversion Suharto, 2006 Scales Categories Interval of Mean 1 Strongly Disagree 1.00-1.79 2 Disagree 1.80-2.59 3 Neither Agree or Disagree 2.60-3.39 4 Agree 3.40-4.19 5 Strongly Agree 4.20-5.00