The Website The Expert Judgment

The results of the expert judgment questionnaire were analyzed using descriptive statistic. The central tendency which was applied in this study is the mean. In classifying the category, the mean was converted into frequencies of agreement. The results of the questionnaire are provided in Appendix. The summary of the results are presented as follows. Table 4.31: The expert judgment of the website No. Statements Values Description of Agreement 1 The goal of the website is clear. 5.0 Strongly Agree 2 The information about the website is clear. 5.0 Strongly Agree 3 The website is welcoming and user- friendly. 4.0 Agree From the table 4.31, it can be seen that in terms of goal and the website information, the expert agreed that both of them are clear. It shows by the value 5.0 in those areas. Moreover, the expert also agreed that the website is welcoming and user-friendly. Table 4.32: The expert judgment of the website No. Statements Values Description of Agreement 4 The design of the website is consistent. 5.0 Strongly Agree 5 The design of the website is well organized. 5.0 Strongly Agree 6 The navigation is clear. 4.0 Agree 7 The navigation is easy to use. 5.0 Strongly Agree The table above shows the agreement of the expert that the design is consistent and well-organized. In addition, the expert also believed that the navigation is both clear and easy to use. It is shown by the values that reached 4.0 – 5.0. Table 4.33: The expert judgment of the website No. Statements Values Description of Agreement 8 Links to other websites are working properly. 4.0 Agree 9 The menu panel is easy to follow. 5.0 Strongly Agree 10 The pictures placement is effective. 4.0 Agree 11 What subject the website relates to is clear. 5.0 Strongly Agree Table 4.33 shows that the expert believed that most of the links to other websites are working properly. The expert also agreed that the menu panel of the website is easy to follow and the pictures placement is effective. In addition, the expert also agreed that what subject the website relates to is clear. Finally, the conclusion from the results above is that the website has reached the standards of good teaching and learning website according to Lever and Duffy’s rubric 2009. The conclusion is based on expert’ opinion which indicates the agreement based on the standards proposed by Lever and Duffy about academic website. However, similar to the materials, the first draft of the website still has some weaknesses. The expert, who was asked to evaluate the website, found some parts of the first draft which needed some revisions. The revisions were necessary in order to make the draft more appropriate. Therefore, the suggestions from the expert were used to revise the first draft. The opinions of the expert will be presented later.

6. The Review of the First Draft a. Web Based Writing Learning Materials

The expert had suggested that the materials need some changes in each unit. The most noticeable things are about the language and layout. In the first draft of the materials, there are some grammar mistakes and mechanics in the instructions and input texts. Moreover, the explanation in Grammar Centre section needs to be improved. The detailed suggestions from the experts about the language will be discussed later. However about the layout of the materials, the revisions will not be fundamental because the materials would be presented in the website. 1 The Evaluation and Revision of Unit 1 Table 4.34 shows the evaluation and revision of Unit 1 of the first draft of the materials. The complete version of second draft of the materials can be seen in Appendix. Table 4.34: The evaluation and revision of unit 1 Part Evaluation Revision Stage 1: Grammar Centre – Task D.1 The Grammar Centre should be given some explanation about irregular form of past tense. Adding explanation about irregular form of past tense. Stage 3 – Task Number 2 Written: Reread and revise your story from and email it to your teacher to get evaluation and feedback. Reread and revise your story and email it to your teacher to get evaluation and feedback. 2 The Evaluation and Revision of Unit 2 The evaluation and the revision of the first draft of Unit 2 can be seen in the table below. The revised materials can be seen in Appendix. Table 4.35: The evaluation and revision of unit 2 Part Evaluation Revision Stage 1: Information Centre – Task B.3 The adjectives should be categorized in the same category. It was written: big round blue brown green narrow big narrow round blue brown green Stage 1 – Grammar Centre – Task D.1 The instruction should be revised. It was written: Study the following explanation about present simple. Study the following explanation about simple present tense.