= 32,43 kJm
2
6. Menghitung Kekuatan Tarik sampel komposit
Nilai kekuatan tarik dapat dihitung dengan menggunakan persamaan berikut :
σ =
Dengan  :
σ
= Kuat tarik Mpa F = Gaya N
A = Luas permukaan mm
2
a. Komposisi 0
Beban sampel = 23,84 kgf Tebal sampel
= 3 mm Lebar sampel = 20 mm
Sehingga : Luas A
= b x d = 20 mm x 3 mm
= 60 mm
2
Loadbeban P = 23,84 x 9,8 ms
2
= 233,63 N
σ =
=
,
= 3,9 MPa
Universitas Sumatera Utara
b. Komposisi 1
Beban sampel = 35,45 kgf Tebal sampel
= 3 mm Lebar sampel = 20 mm
Sehingga : Luas A
= b x d = 20 mm x 3 mm
= 60 mm
2
Loadbeban P = 35,45 kgf x 9,8 ms
2
= 347,41 N
σ = =
,
= 5,8 MPa
c. Komposisi 2
Beban sampel = 37,05 kgf Tebal sampel
= 3 mm Lebar sampel = 20 mm
Sehingga : Luas A
= b x d = 20 mm x 3 mm
= 60 mm
2
Loadbeban P =  37,05 kgf x 9,8 ms
2
= 363,09 N
Universitas Sumatera Utara
σ = =
,
= 6,05 MPa
d. Komposisi 3
Beban sampel = 63,93 kgf Tebal sampel
= 3 mm Lebar sampel = 20 mm
Sehingga : Luas A
= b x d = 20 mm x 3 mm
= 60 mm
2
Loadbeban P =  63,93 kgf x 9,8 ms
2
= 626,51 N
σ =
=
,
= 10,4 MPa
e. Komposisi 4
Beban sampel = 46,76 kgf Tebal sampel
= 3 mm Lebar sampel = 20 mm
Sehingga : Luas A
= b x d
Universitas Sumatera Utara
= 20 mm x 3 mm = 60 mm
2
Loadbeban P =  46,76 kgf x 9,8 ms
2
= 458,25 N
σ =
=
,
= 7,64 MPa
f. Komposisi 5
Beban sampel = 44,47 kgf Tebal sampel
= 3 mm Lebar sampel = 20 mm
Sehingga : Luas A
= b x d = 20 mm x 3 mm
= 60 mm
2
Loadbeban P =  44,47 kgf x 9,8 ms
2
= 435,81 N
σ =
=
,
= 7,3 MPa
Universitas Sumatera Utara
LAMPIRAN D STANDAR PEMBUATAN SAMPEL
ASTM D256
Significance and Use
Before  proceeding  with  these  test  methods,  reference  should  be  made  to  the specification  of  the  material  being  tested.  Any  test  specimen  preparation,
conditioning,  dimensions,  and  testing  parameters  covered  in  the  materials specification shall take precedence over those mentioned in these test methods. If
there is no material specification, then the default conditions apply.
The pendulum impact test indicates the energy to break standard test specimens of specified  size  under  stipulated  parameters  of  specimen  mounting,  notching,  and
pendulum velocity-at-impact.
The energy lost by the pendulum during the breakage of the specimen is the sum of the following:
Energy to initiate fracture of the specimen; Energy to propagate the fracture across the specimen;
Energy to throw the free end or ends of the broken specimen “toss correction”; Energy to bend the specimen;
Energy to produce vibration in the pendulum arm; Energy  to  produce  vibration  or  horizontal  movement  of  the  machine  frame  or
base;
Energy  to  overcome  friction  in  the  pendulum  bearing  and  in  the  indicating mechanism, and to overcome windage pendulum air drag;
Energy to indent or deform plastically the specimen at the line of impact; and
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Energy to overcome the friction caused by the rubbing of the striker or other part of the pendulum over the face of the bent specimen.
For relatively brittle  materials, for  which fracture  propagation energy is  small  in comparison  with  the  fracture  initiation  energy,  the  indicated  impact  energy
absorbed is, for all practical purposes, the sum of factors 5.3.1 and 5.3.3. The toss correction  see  5.3.3  may  represent  a  very  large  fraction  of  the  total  energy
absorbed when testing relatively dense and brittle materials. Test Method C shall be used for materials that have an Izod impact resistance of less than 27 Jm 0.5
ft·lbfin..  See  Appendix  X4  for  optional  units. The  toss  correction  obtained  in Test Method C is only an approximation of the toss error, since the rotational and
rectilinear velocities may not be the same during the re-toss of the specimen as for the  original  toss,  and  because  stored  stresses  in  the  specimen  may  have  been
released as kinetic energy during the specimen fracture.
For  tough,  ductile,  fiber  filled,  or  cloth-laminated  materials,  the  fracture propagation  energy  see  5.3.2  may  be  large  compared  to  the  fracture  initiation
energy  see  5.3.1.  When  testing  these  materials,  factors  see  5.3.2,  5.3.5,  and 5.3.9  can  become  quite  significant,  even  when  the  specimen  is  accurately
machined  and  positioned  and  the  machine  is in  good  condition  with  adequate capacity. See Note 7. Bending see 5.3.4 and indentation losses see 5.3.8 may
be appreciable when testing soft materials.
Note 7—Although the frame and base of the machine should be sufficiently rigid and  massive  to  handle  the  energies  of  tough  specimens  without  motion  or
excessive vibration, the design must ensure that the center of percussion be at the center of strike. Locating the striker precisely at the center of percussion reduces
vibration of the pendulum arm when used with brittle specimens. However, some losses due to pendulum arm vibration, the amount varying with the design of the
pendulum,  will  occur  with  tough  specimens,  even  when  the  striker  is  properly positioned.
In  a  well-designed  machine  of  sufficient  rigidity  and  mass,  the  losses  due  to factors 5.3.6 and 5.3.7 should be very small. Vibrational losses see 5.3.6 can be
quite  large  when  wide  specimens  of  tough  materials  are  tested  in  machines  of insufficient mass, not securely fastened to a heavy base.
With  some  materials,  a  critical  width  of  specimen  may  be  found  below  which specimens  will  appear  ductile, as  evidenced  by considerable  drawing  or  necking
down  in  the  region  behind  the  notch  and  by a  relatively  high-energy absorption, and  above  which  they  will  appear  brittle  as  evidenced  by  little  or  no  drawing
down or necking and by a relatively low-energy absorption. Since these methods permit a variation in the width of the specimens, and since the width dictates, for
Universitas Sumatera Utara
many  materials,  whether  a  brittle,  low-energy  break  or  a  ductile,  high  energy break  will  occur,  it  is  necessary  that  the  width  be  stated  in  the  specification
covering  that  material  and  that  the  width  be  reported  along  with  the  impact resistance.  In  view  of  the  preceding,  one  should  not  make  comparisons  between
data from specimens having widths that differ by more than a few mils.
The  type  of  failure  for  each  specimen  shall  be  recorded  as  one  of  the  four categories listed as follows:
1. Scope