46
C. The  Implementation  of  Contextual  Teaching  and  Learning  in  the  Second Cycle
The  use  of  Contextual  Teaching  and  Learning  CTL  in  teaching  and learning process in the second cycle was conducted in three meetings on Friday,
April 20, 2012, Monday, April 23, 2012, and Thursday, April 26, 2012. The first and  second  meetings  were  conducted  in 45 minutes.  The  third  meeting  was
conducted  in  ninety  minutes.  There  were  32  students  who  joined  the  class.  The topic in the second cycle was asking and responding to believe or not believe. The
researcher  chose  the  topic  based  on  the  topic  listed in  the  syllabus  of  English subject.
1. Planning
Having reflected the first cycle, the researcher began to plan an action for the  second  cycle.  In  this  step,  the  researcher  prepared  the  lesson  plan  and  the
materials based on the reflection done in the first cycle. In this step, the researcher prepared  the  lesson  plan  and  the  materials.  The  lesson  plan  was  based  on  seven
components  of  CTL  namely:  constructivism,  inquiry,  learning  community, modeling, authentic assessment, and reflection.
a. Constructivism
In  this  stage,  the  researcher  planned  to  give  some  issues  to  the  students. After  that,  the  researcher  asked  the  students  whether  they  believed  the  issues  or
not.  Then,  the  researcher  asked  the  students  to  guess  what  they  would  do  today.
47
These activities aimed to give the students view about what they were going to do in class.
b. Inquiry
In this stage, the researcher planned to show unbelievable pictures and ask the students’ opinion about the pictures. Then, the researcher asked the students to
work in group of four. After that, the researcher gave a picture to each group and asked them to discuss whether they believed something happened in the picture or
not.  They  had  to  give  reason.  Then,  the  representative  of  each  group  would present  the  result  of  the  discussion.  These  activities  aimed  to  encourage  the
students  to  be  brave  to  speak  English.  The  researcher  also  planned  to  explain about  cultural  differences  between  American  and  Indonesian  in asking  and
responding to believe or not believe. The aims of these activities were to help the students  relate  the  material with  their  real  world  context  and  build  their
knowledge about asking and responding to believe or not believe.
c. Learning Community
In this stage, the  researcher planned to ask the students to work in  group consisted  of  4  students.  In  learning  community,  the  researcher  tried  to  apply
cooperative  learning  and  problem-based  learning.  The  students  were  encouraged to  work  together  in  groups  to  solve  the  problem  relating  to  the  topic  material
which was asking and responding to believe or not believe.
d. Modeling
The  researcher  also  planned  to  give  model  of  the  dialogue asking  and responding to believe or not believe. The aims of these activities were to help the
48
students have clearer understanding about the dialogue and the expression used in asking and responding to believe or not believe.
e. Questioning