Observation Sheet Field Notes Speaking Rubric Questionnaire Interview

24

C. Research Participants

The participants were XG students of SMA Negeri 1 Kasihan Bantul academic year 20112012. The students consisted of 32 students. Twenty one of them were girls and 11 of them were boys. They were in the even semester academic year 20112012. The students in class XG still found difficulty when they did speaking practice. Therefore, the researcher chose this class to help the students improve their speaking skill.

D. Instruments and Data Gathering Technique

The instruments used in this research were observation sheet, field notes, questionnaires, and interview.

1. Observation Sheet

Observation sheet was used to know the situation in classroom during the implementation. Observation sheet was also used to gain feedback and comment from the observers toward the teaching learning process. The observers were the English teacher of class XG and an outside observer.

2. Field Notes

Field notes were used to know the teaching-learning process during the implementation. An outside observer made field notes based on the observation during the teaching-learning process. Field notes helped the researcher to reflect on the condition of the teaching-learning process during the implementation. 25

3. Speaking Rubric

Speaking rubric was used to help the researcher to see the improvement of the students’ speaking skill while they perform. The researcher used a rubric taken from A Collection of Performance Task and Rubrics: Foreign Languages see Appendix 20. The researcher observed the progress of the students speaking skills using speaking rubric included several assessment categories, i.e. task completion, comprehensibility, fluency, pronunciation, vocabulary, and grammar. The minimum score for each category was 1 and the maximum score was 4. The total score was calculated using the following formula. ∑x = the total score of all categories

4. Questionnaire

Questionnaire was used to help the researcher to know the students’ opinion on the use of CTL to improve their speaking skill or not. The questionnaire used Likert Scale and also open-ended questions. Questionnaire was given twice after the implementation in cycle one and cycle two. The researcher distributed the questionnaire to all of the students of class XG.

5. Interview

Interview was used to support the result of the research whether or not the use of CTL could improve students’ speaking skill. The researcher interviewed ∑x x 100 24 Total Score = 26 five students. Five students were chosen randomly. The types of the questions were open-ended questions. The researcher gathered the data in several steps of two cycles. First, the researcher identified the problem faced by XG students in SMA N 1 Kasihan Bantul through observation and preliminary study. Having identified the problem faced by the students, the researcher tried to find a solution to overcome the problem. After that, the researcher planned teaching learning activities and then implemented it in the class. In this stage, the researcher used some instruments to gather data. The first instrument was observation sheet. The researcher gave the observation sheet to the English teacher of class XG and an outside observer during the implementation in cycle one and cycle two. Observation sheet in cycle one and cycle two was the same. The observer observed what was going on in the classroom during the teaching learning process and wrote it down in the field notes. The researcher asked for help from an outside observer to write field notes in all meetings to avoid bias. Field notes helped the researcher to observe many aspects of her teaching. Field notes also helped the researcher to reflect the action during the implementation in cycle one and two. In the last meeting of each cycle, the students performed their performance in front of their friends. In this activity, the researcher used speaking rubric to help her see the improvement of the students’ speaking skill during the implementation. After the implementation in cycle one and cycle two, the researcher distributed questionnaires to all of the students. Questionnaires helped 27 the researcher to know the students’ opinion whether the use of contextual teaching and learning could improve their speaking skill or not. After that the researcher conducted interview to five students in the last meeting of the second cycle. After the first cycle ended, the researcher reflected on what went well and did not go well in teaching-learning process. Based on the reflection on the implementation in the first cycle, the researcher planned and prepared the next action in the next cycle. At the end of the second cycle, the researcher concluded to what extent the use of contextual teaching and learning helped the students to improve their speaking skill.

E. Data Analysis Technique