ignored the power which they actually had, b the students tend to use impolite languages because of their social environment around home and
from the students’ family background.
5.2 Suggestions
Based on the conclusions stated above, this study has some suggestions to the readers as provided in the following items.
1 To the other researchers, it is suggested that this study could be further expanded, elaborated and explored in other field in order to contribute the
development of impoliteness theories such as the use of impoliteness in other application or literary works.
2
To all the readers, it is suggested to use the study as references for understanding the application of impoliteness in classroom interaction.
REFERENCES
Bogdan, Robert C., Biklen, Sari Knopp. 1992. Qualitative Research for Education, An
Introduction to Theory and Method. Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon. Bousfield, D. 2008. Impoliteness in Struggle for Power in Bousfield, D. Locher eds,
Impoliteness in Language. Studies on Its Interplay with Power and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Brown,P., Levinson, C.S.1987. Politeness: Some Universal in Language Usage.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Creswell, J. W. Miller, D. L. 2000.
Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory into Practice, 393, 124-131.
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25.
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2005. Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The
Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research. Culpeper, Jonathan. 2007.
Reflections on Impoliteness, Relational Work and Power. University of Lancaster
Denzin, N. K. 1978. The Research Act: A theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods.
New York: McGraw-Hill. Emmer, E.T., Strough, L. 2001.
Classroom Management: A Critical Part of Educational Psychology, with Implication for Teacher Education. Educational Psychologist, 36
2, 103-112
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power, Language in Social Life Series. Essex:
Longman Group UK Fujiki, M., Brinton Clarke, D. 2002.
Emotion Regulation in Children with Specific Lanugage Impairment. Language, Speech, and Theory Services in Schools, 33, 102-
111 Halliday, M.Hasan, R. 1985.
Language, Context and Text: Aspect of language in a social semiotic perspective. Victoria Deakin University Press
Hussein, Ashatu. 2009. The Use of Triangulation in Social Science Research: Can
Qualitative and Quantitative Methods Be Combined? Journal of Comparative Social Work. 1, 3-5
Jick, T. D. 1979. Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602-611.
