BivariatAnalysis. PARENTAL PRACTICE IN ADOLESCENTS WITH VIDEO GAME PLAYING IN YOGYAKARTA MUNICIPALITY
100 PROCEEDING BOOK
The 2
nd
International Conference on Health Science 2015
Based on Table 3 shows that hematoma did not exist in most patients who obtained a type of anticoagulant drugs. While it occurred in most of the patients that received two or
more types of anticoagulant drugs occurred hematoma. Based on the analysis by the Chi- Square data showed that there are differences in the incidence of hematoma between the
proportion of patients who acquire one type of anticoagulant drugs to patients that received two or more types of medication p value = 0.000; 0.5, with OR = 19, 81, meaning that patients
receive two types of anticoagulant drugs or have the possibility of hematoma at 19.81 times compared with patients receiving one type of anticoagulant drug administration, while the
lowest value 95 CI 5.01, and the highest 78.36 means that the use of two types of drugs a kind or more risk factors have a strong infl uence on the occurrence of hematoma.
Table 4 Distribution of Patients According to the size and Genesis Sheath Hematoma Patients
transradial Cardiac Catheterization at Dr. Sardjito Hospital n = 69 Sheath Size
Hematoma Total
OR 95 CI
P Value
Not Hematoma Hematoma
Frent N
n n
5F 24
96,0 1
4,0 25
100 31,6
3,92 - 54,7 0,00
6F 19
43,2 25
56,8 44
100 Amount
43 62,3
26 37,7
69 100
Based on Table 4 shows that most patients who use size 5 F sheath hematoma did not occur. While most patients who use size 6 F sheath hematoma occurs. Based on the analysis
by the Chi-Square data showed that there are differences in the incidence of hematoma proportion among patients using 5F sheath size with the size of the patient using a 6F sheath
p value = 0.000; 0.5, with OR = 31.6, meaning patients using a 6F sheath size has the possibility of hematoma of 31.6 times compared with patients using 5F sheath size, while
the value of 95CI 3.92 lows and highs of 54.7 means that using a 6F sheath no risk factors have a strong infl uence to the occurrence of hematoma.
Table 5 Distribution of Patients According Systolic blood pressure and the incidence of hematoma
Patients transradial Cardiac Catheterization at Dr. Sardjito Hospital n = 69 Systolic blood
Pressure Hematoma
Total OR
95 CI P
Value Not Hematoma
Hematoma mmHg
N N
n 140 32
82,1 7
17,9 39
100 7,9
2,6-23,8 0,00
≥ 140 11
36,7 19
63,3 30
100 Amount
43 62,3
26 37,7
69 100
Based on Table 5 shows that most patients whose blood pressure is less than 140 mm Hg did not happen hematoma. While the patients whose blood pressure 140 mm Hg or more
occurred hematoma. Based on the analysis by the Chi-Square data showed that there are differences in the incidence of hematoma between the proportion of patients whose blood
pressure less than 140 mmHg in patients whose blood pressure 140 mm Hg or greater p value = 0.000; 0.5, with OR = 7.9, meaning that patients with a blood pressure of 140 mm
“Optimizing The Quality of Life Children Under SDGs” Sustainable Development Goals
101
Hg or more have the possibility of hematoma by 7.9 times compared with patients with blood pressure less than 140 mm Hg, while the lowest value 95 CI 2.6 and 23.8 means that the
highest pressure 140 or higher systolic blood are risk factors that have a strong infl uence on the occurrence of hematoma.
Table 6 Distribution of Patients According to Frequency Puncture and hematoma Patients
transradial Cardiac Catheterization at Dr. Sardjito Hospital n = 69 Puncture
Frequency Hematoma
Total OR
95 CI P
Value Not Hematoma
Hematoma N
n n
1 time 22
81,5 5
18,5 27
100 4,4
1,40 – 13,81 0,017
≥ 2 times 21
50 21
50 42
100 Amount
43 62,3
26 37,7
69 100
Based on Table 6 shows that most patients do not puncture one hematoma. While patients performed two times or more puncture have opportunities for the possibility of
hematoma or not hematoama. Based on the analysis by the Chi-Square data showed that there are differences in the incidence of hematoma between the proportion of patients with
stab one time with a puncture twice or more p value = 0.000; 0.5, with OR = 4.4, meaning that patients with twice or more puncture have the possibility of hematoma by 4.4 times
compared to patients with stab one time, while the value of the 95 CI 13.81 lows and highs of 1.4 means that the puncture twice or more risk factors have a strong infl uence on
the occurrence of hematoma.
Table 7 Distribution of Patients According to Pressure TR Band and Genesis Hematoma Patients
transradial Cardiac Catheterization at Dr. Sardjito Hospital n = 69 TR Band
Pressure Hematoma
Total OR
95 CI P
Value Not Hematoma
Hematoma n
n N
13 cc 37
82,2 8
17,8 45
100 13,9
1,18 – 46,02 0,000
13 cc 6
25,0 18
75 24
100 Amount
43 62,3
26 37,7
69 100
Based on Table 7 shows that hematoma did not happen in most patients given 13 cc pressure TR Band. While it did happen to most patients given TR Band pressure of less than
13 cc occurred hematoma. Based on the analysis by the Chi-Square data showed that there are differences in the incidence of hematoma between the proportion of patients with TR
Band size 13 cc with TR Band size of less than 13 cc p value = 0.000; 0.5, with OR = 13.9 meaning that patients with TR Band size less than 13 cc has the possibility of hematoma by
13.9 times compared with patients with TR Band size 13 cc, while the lowest value 95 CI 1.18, and the highest 46.02 means that the reduction pressure is less than TR Band 13 cc
prematurely are risk factors that have a strong infl uence on the occurrence of hematoma.
102 PROCEEDING BOOK
The 2
nd
International Conference on Health Science 2015
Table 8 Distribution of Patients According to the Body Mass Index and Genesis Hematoma
Patients transradial Cardiac Catheterization at Dr. Sardjito Hospital n = 69 Body Mass
Index Hematoma
Total OR
95 CI P
Value Not Hematoma
Hematoma n
n N
Normal 13
56,5 10
43,5 23
100 0,00
0,661 Not normal
30 65,2
16 34,8
46 100
Amount 43
62,3 26
37,7 69
Based on Table 8 shows that the majority of patients with BMI more did not happen hematoma. While a small percentage of patients whose normal BMI occurred hematoma.
Based on the analysis by the Chi-Square data showed that there is no difference between the incidence of hematoma proportion with body mass index p value = 0.661; 0.5, with
OR = 0 means that patients with abnormal BMI has no effect on the likelihood of occurrence hematoma compared to patients with normal BMI.