necessary  data  which  had  not  been  covered  in  the  in-depth  interviews  done previously.
The  data  obtained  was  used  to  conduct  triangulation  in  order  to improve the validation of this study.
E. Data Processing
After  conducting  the  in-depth  interviews  and  transcribed  the  data,  the researcher then conducted artifacts collection and observation. After obtaining the
Figure 3.1. Data Gathering Techniques
Transcript of interview Transcribing the recorded data
Data Gathering Techniques of Teachers’ Lived
Experience in Selecting Textbooks
STEPS
Conducting in-depth interview
RESULT
Conducting artifacts collection Transcribing the interview
result Constructing questions as in-
depth interview guideline
Conducting observation Conducting re-interview
List of questions
Audio-recorded data, field notes
Transcript of the in-depth interview
Field notes Field notes
Audio- recorded data, field notes
results of those three data gathering instruments, the researcher analyzed the data and conducted re-interview to gather the missing information.
The  next  step  was  transcribing  the  overall  data.  The  researcher  then  also read and re-read the transcript, made data classifications using table of categories
of the constructs and coded the data. Berg 1989  in Miles and Huberman 1994: 9  state  that  coding  is  giving  tags  or  labels  for  assigning  units  of  meaning  to
descriptive  information  compiled  during  the  study.  In  line  with  this  definition, coding was done in this study in order to find out the key content of the in-depth
interviews,  artifacts  collection,  and  observation.  The  researcher  used  italized  or bold  typed  to  underline  the  expressions  needed  to  identify  the  themes  under  the
research. The assigned codes describe the pseudo name of the individual identity and  category  content  of  the  data.  The  researcher  reduced  the  data  for
manageability  purpose  and  transformed  selectively  in  terms  of  the  issues  being addressed.  In  this  case,  only  significant  and  meaningful  chunks  of  data  were
selected and then removed from the raw data for analysis. After coding, the researcher described the participant‟s lived experience in
selecting textbooks. The description is divided into two categories, namely 1 the descri
ption of the teacher‟s individual lived experience which is based on the data presentation  especially  on  the  teacher‟s  personal  experience,  and  2  the
description  of  the  teacher‟s  shared  lived  experience  which  is  based  on  the  data presentation  especially
on  the  teacher‟s  shared  experience.  Because  the description is based on the data presentation, it is hoped that it would be free from
the researcher‟s interference. The description consists of five categories based on
the aspects of lived experience used in this study. They are understanding, belief, action, feeling, and intention.
The step after the description is interpretation. To make the interpretation, the researcher worked back and forth between the gained data and the researcher‟s
own  perspective  and  understanding  which  may  be  based  on  theories  related  to textbooks  selection  to  make  sense  of  the  evidence.  The  interpretation  is  also
divided into categories,  namely  1 the interpretation of the teacher‟s individual lived  experience,  and  2  the  interpr
etation  of  the  teacher‟s  shared  lived experience.
The  last  step  of  the  research  is  drawing  conclusion.  At  this  step,  the research needed to consider again what the data meant. Then, after reviewing the
analyzed  data,  the  research  needed  to  assess  the  implications  for  the  research questions.
F. Trustworthiness
Realizing  the  trustworthiness  of  the  findings  in  this  study,  the  researcher conducted triangulation. According to Cohen, Manion, and Morrison 2003: 112
triangulation  refers  to  the  use  of  two  or  more  methods  of  data  collection  in  the study  of  some  aspect  of  human  behavior.  Meanwhile,  Slake  1994  in  Holliday
2002 states that triangulation is normally thought of as increasing the validity of qualitative research by getting and comparing „multiple perceptions‟ of the same
phenomenon. This can be done by establishing relationship between several types of data gained from various resources.