CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION PERBEDAAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH SISWA MENGGUNAKAN PEMEBELAJARAN KONTEKSTUAL DAN PEMBELAJARAN LANGSUNG KELAS IX DI SMP NEGERI 1 MEDAN.

3.8 Level of Problem Solving Skill of Student in Mathematic Problem 35

CHAPTER IV RESULT AND DISCUSSION

4.1 The Result of Problem Solving ability 4.1.1 Post Test of First and Second Experment Classes 4.1.2 Data Normality Test 4.1.3 Data Homogeniety Test 4.1.4 Hypothesis Testing 4.1.5 Level of Problem Solving Ability of students in Mathematics 36 36 37 37 38 38

4.2 Observation result 39

4.2.1 Student observation sheet 39 4.2.2 Teacher observation sheet 40 4.3 Discussion of research result 41 4.3.1 Discussion of Students Mistake for problem solving 4.3.1.1 For the first Experiment Class Using Contextual Teaching and Learning CTL Approach 4.3.1.2 For the second Experiment Class Using direct instruction 42 42 44

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

5.1 Conclusion 46 5.2 Suggestion 47 REFERENCES 48 APPENDIX 50 FIGURE LIST Page Figure 2.1 Interaction between element and contextual learning 19 Figure 2.2 Instructional outcomes for direct instruction 19 Figure 2.3 Example of Cylinder 22 Figure 2.4 Net of Cylinder 22 Figure 4.1 Level of Problem Solving 39 Figure 4.2 Student Mistake for arranging Strategy using CTL Approach 42 Figure 4.3 Student’s Mistake in Implementing the Planning 43 Figure 4.4 Mistakes for reevaluating all steps have done 44 Figure 4.6 Mistakes in Arranging Planing problem solving 44 Figure 4.7 Mistakes in Implementing the Planning 45 Figure 4.8 Mistakes Reevaluating all steps that have done 45 TABLE LIST Table 2.1 Difference between direct instruction and CTL approach Page 20 Table 3.1 Research Design 26 Table 3.2 Blue print post test of volume and surface area cylinder 28 Table 3.3 Scoring of problem solving 29 Table 3.4 Ideal score for teacher activities 31 Table 3.5 Ideal score for students’ activities 32 Table 3.6 Criteria of Students Mastering Level 35 Table 4.1 Post test result of the first and second experiment classes 36 Table 4.2 Result of Normality Testing 37 Table 4.3 Result of Homogeneity Testing 37 Table 4.4 Result of Hypothesis Testing 38 Table 4.5 Level of problem solving ability of two classes 38 Table 4.6 Summary students’ observation sheet 40 Table 4.97Summary teacher observation sheet 41 APPENDIX LIST Appendix 1 First Lesson Plan for Experiment Class I Page 51 Appendix 2 Second Lesson Plan for Experiment Class I 60 Appendix 3 First Lesson Plan for Experiment Class II 66 Appendix 4 Second Lesson Plan for Experiment Class II 69 Appendix 5 Student Activity sheet Surface area of Cylinder 72 Appendix 6 Student Activity sheet Volume of Cylinder 76 Appendix 7 Hint of scoring problem solving ability 79 Appendix 8 Blue Print of Post-test 80 Appendix 9 Post Test Question 81 Appendix 10 Alternative Solution of Post-test 83 Appendix 11 Validator Evaluation Sheet 87 Appendix 12 Observer Evaluation Sheet 88 Appendix 13 Observation Sheet of Teacher Activities CTL 90 Appendix 14 Observation Sheet of Teacher Activities DI 92 Appendix 15 Observation Sheet of Students Activities CTL 94 Appendix 16 Observation Sheet of Students Activities DI 95 Appendix 17 Validator Names 96 Appendix 18 Validation Analysis of Validator Agreement for Post test 97 Appendix 19 Realibity Analysis of Post Test 99 Appendix 20 Post Test For First Experiment Class CTL 101 Appendix 21 Post Test For Second Experiment Class DI 102 Appendix 22 Post Test Mark for 1 st and 2 nd experiment classes 103 Appendix 23 Data Experiment Class I CTL 104 Appendix 24 Data Experiment Class II DI 105 Appendix 25 The Calculation procedure average, Variance and Standard Deviation of 1 st and 2 nd experiment classes 106 Appendix 26 Calculation of Normality Testing 108 Appendix 27 Calculation of HomogenietyTesting 111 Appendix 28 Research Documentation 114

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

Dokumen yang terkait

PERBEDAAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH DAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS SISWA ANTARA MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN LANGSUNG.

0 3 39

PENERAPAN PENDEKATAN KONTEKSTUAL UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA SISWA DI KELAS VIII-1 SMP NASRANI 1 MEDAN.

0 6 23

MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIK SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI 3 MEDAN MELALUI PEMBELAJARAN KONTEKSTUAL.

0 2 30

PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH DAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS SISWA SMP NEGERI 6 MEDAN MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH.

0 3 41

PERBEDAAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIK DAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR SISWA DENGAN PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH DAN PEMBELAJARAN LANGSUNG.

0 6 38

PERBEDAAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA SISWA YANG DIAJAR MENGGUNAKAN PEMEBELAJARAN TIPE COOPERATIF INTEGREATED READING AND COMPOSITION DENGAN PEMBELAJARAN EKSPOSITORIBERBANTUAN ALAT PERAGA KELAS VII MATERI SEGIEMPAT DI SMP PENCAWAN MEDAN.

0 2 21

PERBEDAAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH DAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIKA ANTARA SISWA YANG DIBERI PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH DENGAN PEMBELAJARAN LANGSUNG.

0 5 59

PERBEDAAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA SISWA YANG DIAJAR MENGGUNAKAN PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA REALISTIK DENGAN PEMBELAJARAN KONVENSIONAL DI KELAS IX SMP NEGERI 3 LUBUK PAKAM T.A 2012 / 2013.

0 1 13

PERBEDAAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIS SISWA MELALUI PEMBELAJARAN KONTEKSTUAL DENGAN PEMBELAJARAN BIASA DI SMP NEGERI KOTA PEMATANG SIANTAR.

0 1 43

PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIS SISWA SMP MELALUI PEMBELAJARAN DENGAN PENDEKATAN KONTEKSTUAL

0 0 10