DISCUSSION RESULT AND DISCUSSION
could be seen in teaching learning process, they were as follows:
1. In the experimental class
When the writer taught using directed reading thinking activity strategy, it made the students more interested in learning. According to Simanjuntak Directed
Reading-Thinking Activity DR-TA is a teaching strategy that guides students in making predictions about a text and then reading to confirm or refute their
predictions. This strategy encourages students to be active and thoughtful readers, enhancing their comprehension. The writer gave three treatment by using directed
reading thinkig activity, this strategy was very helpful, by using directed reading thinking activity, it can make the students felt relaxed, so they could express their
idea in the classroom freely. When the teacher asked the students to comprehend the text, most of them could comprehend it by themselves because of the directed
reading thinking activity steps. Finally, when the teacher gave them some questions, the students were able to answer them well.
2. In the control class
LRD was used by the writer to teach reading in the control class. The writer gave three treatment by using LRD.
According to McKenna in Murni‟s journal Listen Read Discuss LRD is a strategy especially designed for struggling readers. Its
three stages represents before, during, and after stages of all reading lesson format. When the researcher used LRD strategy, she just explained the material and asked
the students to translate the text in Indonesian language. The stude nts‟ attention
were not focused on the lesson. The students seemed bored with it because they had to open their dictionary all the time to get the meaning of the difficult words..
It made them difficult to absorb the materials. The students were also lazy when the writer gave them some questions. The last they could not improve their
comprehension about recount text.
Based on the statement above, it could be seen that there was difference between the students who were taught by using directed reading thinking activity and those
who were taught by using LRD strategy.
However, that different achievement between the students who were taught by using directed reading thinking activity strategy and who were taught by LRD stategy in
reading comprehension gave the influence for the result of the students‟ post–test score. The average of students‟ post-test score in experimental class was 80 and the
average of students‟ post-test in control class was 75. It can be concluded that the students‟ post-test score in experimental class in higher than students‟ post-test score
in control class.
That result was the same with the research by Khomariah which is entitled “Improving reading comprehension taught directed reading thinking activity”.
Activities of students has increased from cycle 1 to cycle II, and also increased from cycle II to cycle III. The mean os cycle I is 15,76 its mean good. The mean of cycle
II is 19,67 its mean good. The mean of cycle III is 22,8 its mean very good.
Therefore, the writer assumed that the directed reading thinking activity strategy could be used for reading comprehension in recount text to guide students in making
predictions about a text. It was supported by Kinsella who says that the DRTA strategy work well when you can make some predictions about what we will read. So,
the writer investigated the influence of directed reading thinking activity towards the students‟ recount text reading comprehension. The writer proved that through this
startegy, the students were better prepared to understand the text
Based on the result of the students‟ score after the treatment by using directed reading thinking activity strategy
, the writer‟s assumption and the supporting theory were proved. So, the writer concludes that there is significant influence of using directed
reading thinking activity towards students‟ recount text reading comprehension at the eight g
rade of MTs Ma‟arif 20 East Lampung in the academic year of 20152016.