16
handle the situations and when the way to solve their conflicts is trough third party’s assistance.
2.1.3.3.2 Private Third-Party Decision Making
Private third-party decision making consists of two ways. Administrative dispute resolution approach is the need of a third-party who has some distance from
the dispute parties and can provide a decision toward a conflict. The third-party should be trusted.
Arbitration is a different from administrative dispute resolution approach. It is a genetic term for a voluntary process in which parties in the conflict request the
assistance of a neutral third party to make a decision and it may be either advisory or binding. Arbitration is a private process which is not open to public.
2.1.3.3.3 Legal Authoritative Third-Party Decision Making
The third strategy is legal authoritative third party decision making. It consists of two approaches. They are judicial approach and legislative approach. The
judicial approach will bring to engage the interference of a party is seen as the institutionalized authority. In this approach, the resolution process on a public area.
The parties who have conflicts usually hire a lawyer to defend their behalf. The result of this approach is winning-lose, binding and enforceable.
The second is Legislative approach. This is another approach to solve conflicts under the law. In this approach, the decision regarding the outcome is a
win-lose process and probably usually uses voting. This process might take a long time.
17
2.1.3.3.4 Extralegal Approach
The last approach is extralegal approach. This approach consists of two types, the first is non-violence approach that is involves a party committing acts or
abstaining so the rival is forced to behave in a desired manner and do not involve physical violence. Generally this approach can be effectively used when the disputes-
parties must rely on each other for their living. It action works if the parties put respect each other.
Second, the violence approach uses physical coercion to maintain a party’s position. In this approach, the party who possesses more power will be able to force
the result of the resolution. It often happens by forcing the decision with physical coercion.
2.2 Theoretical Framework
To analyze the first problem, I will apply Abram’s theory of character. This theory helps me understand what kind of character Darby Shaw is. Theories of major
and minor characters by Milligan are used to understand Darby Shaw‘s character and her personality that is revealed in the interaction with others. I use Abram’s theory in
order to find out Darby Shaw as a round character or a flat character. The theory of characterization by Murphy helps me to get better understanding. Theory of
character by Holman and Harmon helps me to know whether the main character is dynamic or static.
To get a better understanding about conflicts that happen in one’s life, I apply the theory of conflict by Worchel and Cooper. This is to find out the conflicts that
Kategori