Conclusions CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

students also become more motivated in learning writing. Besides, it also encourages students to actively participate in the teaching and learning process. It implies that the brainstorming technique can promote students to learn writing. 4. Conducting various activities in the classroom such as implementing the brainstorming technique would be very beneficial for the students. They will be more interested in learning and will not easily get bored. It implies that brainstorming technique is an interesting activity applied in teaching and learning writing.

C. Suggestions

In accordance to the conclusions and implications of the study above, the researcher proposes the following suggestions. 1. For English Teachers The teacher needs to create various interesting activities which can motivate and support the students to learn English especially writing. It is suggested that the English teachers need to apply the brainstorming technique as an alternative activity in teaching writing. 2. For the Students The students need to broaden their experience in writing a ctivities and discover their own best way in learning writing. They should practice regularly to improve their writing skill. It is suggested that the students need to use the brainstorming technique in writing that make them feel at ease and enable them to generate ideas to compose writing. 3. For other Researchers Other researchers can apply this study to conduct another studies on the same field in order to investigate a further effect of brainstorming technique to improve students‟ writing ability. REFERENCES Al-Khatib, Bilal. The Effect of Using Brainstorming Strategy in Developing Creative Problem Solving Skills among Female Students in Princess Alia University College. American Internationa; Journal of Contemporary Research Vol.2 No. 10; October 2012. Angelo, Frank J. 1980. Process of Thought in Composition, Winthrop: Winthrop Publisher Inc. Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan BSNP. 2006. Standar Isi: Standar Kompetensi dan Kompetensi Dasar SMAMA. Jakarta: BSNP. Brown, H. Douglas. 2000. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, 4th ed. White Plains, NY: Longman. ________________. 2001. Teaching by Principles: and Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Pearson Education. ________________. 2004. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. NewYork: Pearson Education. Burns, Anne. 1999. Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachesr. New York: Cambridge University Press. __________. 2010. Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching. New York: Taylor Francis. Byrne, Donn. 1998. Teaching Writing Skills. London: Longman Group UK. Carroll, J.A., and Wilson, E.E. 1993. Acts of Teaching: How to Teach Writing. Denver, CO: Teacher Ideas Press. Chesla, Elizabeth. 2006. Write Better Essays in just 20 Minutes A Day 2 nd Ed.. New York: LearningExpress. Clark, Irene. L., et al. 2003. Concepts in Composition: Theory and Practice in the Teaching of Writing. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Depdiknas. 2006. Standar Isi, SKL Depdiknas, BNSP. Jakarta. Ferris, Dana. R., and Hedgcock, John S. 2005. Teaching ESL Composition: Purpose, Process, and Practice 2 nd Ed.. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.