c. Observing
The writer as observ er noted all of students’ activity in teaching-
learning process. In this cycle, the writer saw that the teaching-learning process was not running well. Many of students were not confident to
perform some action verbs, they had to be persuaded, and thus they wanted to perform it. Some students were confused when they wanted to perform
the writer’s commands. One of students did not want to perform action verbs; he told the writer that he was sick. In teacher’s performance, she
gave the commands loudly, but there were many students asked her to repeat her command, she probably gave the commands too fast.
In addition, the writer also noted the situation of class. It was crowded in the first meeting. It was also occur when the writer divided
students into group or team, but they seemed more enthusiastic to do the exercise.
d. Reflecting
The writer decided to modify the action because the posttest I showed only 33.33 who passed the KKM. It could be showed that the
writer should do the next cycle. The writer fe
lt satisfied enough because there is real students’ improvement in remembering action verb although the teaching learning
target could not accomplish yet, it could be seen from comparing posttest I
and pretest score.
In implementing TPR, the writer felt unsatisfied. The teaching- learning process was not running well. First, teacher’s performance. She
gave the command too fast, thus students were confused to imitate her. In this case, the writer as teacher decided to give command clearly and slowly.
Second, students’ response. They were not confident to response teacher’s
command. To solve this problem, the writer decided to encourage them, motivate them and taught more enthusiastic than last performance. In
solving this problem, the writer made a strategy, she would gave command