Auxiliary Verb Verb Tense

2 To transform affirmative statement into interrogative statement, move auxiliary verb on the beginning of sentence, the verb used is verb1 and put a question mark ? at the end of sentence. Examples: He drove a new car last month. Did he drive a new car last month? They ate noodles a few minutes ago. Did they eat noodles a few minutes ago? 37

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND RESEARCH FINDINGS

A. Research Methodology

1. The Place and Time of Research

This study was conducted at second year of MTs Al-Khairiyah Jakarta, Jln. Mampang Prapatan IV No. 74 Jakarta Selatan, the 1 st semester of 2010-2011 academic years. The research was held on August 25 th , 2010.

2. The Method of Research

In this research, the writer used descriptive qualitative method to know the most errors‟ that students did in their writing by giving the second year students of MTs Al-Khairiyah Jakarta a written test as sentence exercise about simple present, present progressive and simple past tense. After that, she analyzed them through classifying their errors into verb tense, auxiliary verb, word order, omission and punctuation. Moreover, she interpreted the data about what kind of error that mostly students made. The final step, the writer concluded the result of research.

3. The Population and Sample of Research

The population of the research is the second year students of Islamic Junior High School at Mampang Prapatan IV no. 71-74 Jakarta Selatan. The total numbers of the population were 154 students who are divided into four classes, A, B, C, and D. The sample of research is four classes, they are 40 students. The writer used purposive cluster sampling technique decides the sample. The writer took only 10 students from each class.

4. The Technique of collecting Data

To collect the data, she gave sentence exercise to the students with providing ten affirmative sentences for simple present tense, present progressive tense and for simple past tense see appendix 5. Then she asked them to transform those of affirmative sentences into negative and interrogative form.

5. The Procedure of Error Research

a. Identification of errors, the first step in the process of analysis is recognitionidentification of errors. In this step teachers recognize the students‟ errors from the task give by the teachers. b. Description of errors, the next step is the describing errors. It begins when an identification stage has taken place. The description of student errors involves classification of kinds of errors made by the students. c. Explanation of errors, the third step in the process of analysis is the explanation of error that can be regarded as a linguistic problem. This step attempts to account for how and why the students‟ errors happen. d. Evaluation of errors, in this step, the teacher gives evaluation from the task done by the students depends on the task that teacher will be giving to the students. e. Preventingcorrection of error, finally the last step in the process of analysis is correction of error when the teacher checks the result from the task done by the students. And then the teacher gives the correct answer from the errors has been done by the students. 1

6. The Technique of Data Analysis

The technique of data analysis used by the writer was descriptive analysis technique percentage, with the percentage from the frequency of information and divided with the number of cases. The formula is: Notes P = Percentage F = Frequency of wrong answer N = Number of sample 2

B. RESEARCH FINDING

1. Data Description

The writer gave the test to get the valid data. She asked the students to transform simple present, present progressive and simple past tense from affirmative into negative and interrogative form in order to analyze students‟ errors in their writing. Moreover, to know its result, the writer made the table of students‟ errors. The writer identified their test of results which are divided into five components, they are; verb tense, auxiliary, word order, omission and punctuation with classifying and giving correction on each of sentences see appendices 6. 1 Theo Van Els and friends, Applied Linguistics and the Learning and Teaching of Foreign Languages, London: a Division of Hodder Stoughton, 1983, p. 47 2 Sudjiono Anas, Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007, p. 43 P= FN x 100

Dokumen yang terkait

The efectiveness of using dialogue techique in teaching simple present tense: a pre-experimental study at the first grade of the students in MTsN Tangerang II Pamulang

0 11 61

Improving Students’ Understanding Of Passive Voice Of The Simple Past Tense By Using Contextual Teaching And Learning (A Classroom Action Research In The Second Year Of Mts Al-Mujahidin Cikarang, 2012/2013 Academic Year)

2 47 75

Analysis Of The Students’ Ability In Using The Simple Past Tense (A Descriptive Study At The Second Grade Of Smp Negeri 3 South Tangerang )

0 5 69

Presented to the Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher’s Training in a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of S.Pd. (Bachelor of Art) in English Language Education

1 12 102

Error Analysis on Transforming Affirmative to Negative and Interrogative Sentences of Simple Presnt Tense (a case study at SMP YAPERA Ciledug)

2 26 98

The Teaching of simple present tense through cooperative leraning: the experimental study at the eighth grade students of MTs. Soebono Mantofani Ciputat

0 5 84

Students` grammatical errors in simple present tense.

0 0 127

AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ ERRORS IN USING PASSIVE FORM OF THREE TENSES (SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE, SIMPLE PAST TENSE, AND PRESENT PERFECT TENSE) (A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF PURWOKERTO) - repository perpustakaan

0 0 15

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MINIATURE LANGUAGE IN TEACHING SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE AND SIMPLE PAST TENSE AT THE SECOND GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP NEGERI 2 SOKARAJA IN THE ACADEMIC OF YEAR 20112012

0 0 11

AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ ERRORS IN THE USE OF SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE AND SIMPLE PAST TENSE OF SECOND YEAR AT SMA MUHAMMADIYAH TAMBAK

0 1 18