Conclusion The Effectiveness Of Crossword Puzzle In Learning Vocabulary (A Quasy-experimental Study at the Seventh Grade Students of MTs. Muhammadiyah 1 Ciputat)

Lee W R, Language Teaching Games and Context, Second Edition, Oxford Universit Press, 1980 McCarthy, Michael Vocabulary, New York: Oxford University Press, 1990 Mollica, Anthony Cross Word Puzzle and Second Language Teaching, American Association of Teachers of Italian, 2007, http:www.jstor.orgstable27669126 Njoroge, Ruth W. Ndung’uMartin C. and GatambukiGathigia Moses The Use of Cross Word puzzle as a Vocabulary Learning Strategy: A Case of English as Second Language in Kenyan Secondary School, International Journal of Current Research, Vol 5, Issue 02, pp.313-321, February, 2013 Nuessel, Frank Recreational Problem-Solving Activities for Teaching Vocabulary in Elementary and Intermediate Spanish, Hispania, Vol. 77 No. 1 March., 1994, American Association of Teachers of Spanish and Portuguese Richards, Jack C. And Renandya, Willy A Methodology in Language Teaching:An Anthology of Current Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002 Smith, Thomas B Teaching Vocabulary Expeditiously:Three Key of Improving Vocabulary Instruction, The English Journal, Volume 97, No 4 March, 2008 Susetyo, Budi Statistika Untuk Analisis Data, Bandung:Refrika Aditama, Bandung, 2010 Thornbury, Scott How to Teach Vocabulary Harlow: Pearson Education, 2002 Ur, Penny A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1991 Wilkins, D. A, 1972. Linguistics in Language Teaching.Edward Arnold, London ,p. 111 in Unaldi. I., Bardakci. M., Akpinar. K. D., and Dolas. F. A comparison of contextualized, decontextualized and corpus-informed vocabulary instruction: A quasi-experimental study. 2013. Journal of Language and Literature Education, 8. Vassoughu, Hossein Using Word-Search-Puzzle Games for Improving Vocabulary Knowledge of Iranian EFL Learners, Journal of Teaching English as a Foreign Language and Literature of Islamic Azad University of Iran, 1 1, 79-85, Winter 2009 APPENDIX 1 The Calculation of Frequency Distribution of the Pre-test Case Processing Summary kelas Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent pretest experiment 32 100,0 0,0 32 100,0 control 32 100,0 0,0 32 100,0 Descriptives kelas Statistic Std. Error pretest experiment Mean 64,25 1,574 95 Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 61,04 Upper Bound 67,46 5 Trimmed Mean 64,00 Median 66,00 Variance 79,290 Std. Deviation 8,905 Minimum 50 Maximum 83 Range 33 Interquartile Range 12 Skewness ,184 ,414 Kurtosis -,265 ,809 control Mean 57,16 2,188 95 Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 52,69 Upper Bound 61,62 5 Trimmed Mean 57,58 Median 58,50 Variance 153,168