Theoritical Review QUALITY ASSURANCE MANAGEMENT OF GRADUATES

62 models. This evaluation models use objectives as a criteria for success. Evaluation is defined as the measurement process to achieve program objectives. This model is considered more practical to design and develop a program for determining the desired result with the formulation that can be measured, thus it can be said that there is a logical relationship between activities, outcomes, and results measurement procedure. 67

B. Theoritical Review

Related with the research focus that would writers do, as long as I know no one has ever studied it. As for some previous research results that are relevant to this study are as follows: First, the research thesis, 2006 conducted by Abd. Rahman Tumanggor, entitled Implementation of school management in improving the quality of graduates qualitative study on the principal in SMP Negeri 1 Binjai. 68 He is a student of Universitas Negeri Medan. This research is a qualitative research whose results showed that the SMP Negeri 1 Binjai has implemented improvements in the terms of quality management graduates. Second, the research thesis, 2010 conducted by Moh. Abdul Muchlis student of UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, entitled Implementation of Education Quality Quality assurance management of graduatesin Pondok 67 Za inal Arifin,Program’s Evaluation Models, Bandung, UPI, 2010,p.3 68 Abd. Rahman Tumanggor, 2006. Implementation School Management To Improve Quality of Graduates Qualitative Study to the Principal of State Junior High School 1 Binjai 63 Pesantren Darul Ulum Jombang East Java Rejoso Peterongan. 69 The method which used was using descriptive techniques, analytics, and qualitative and then connect it. Third, the research thesis, 2009 conducted by Choirun Ahmadi student of UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, entitled Implementation of Quality Management System in MKN 2 Wonosari Gunungkidul. 70 The method which used was using descriptive analytics. After looking at the literature review above, it is increasingly apparent difference between the researcher that will be carried out with the authors of existing research. It was seen on the idea that the author will focus on the management of quality improvement do with research that has been conducted by Abd. Rahman Tumanggor, Moh. Abdul Muchlis and research that has been done by Choirun Ahmadi. The reason are the research Abd. Rahman Tumanggor although using the same theme on improving the quality of graduates, but the object of research conducted more focus on the management of the principal, while the research conducted by Moh. Abdul Muchlis, although equally discuss about management quality improvement but it has different from the places and objects of the research. Moh. Abdul Muchlis focused in boarding school. While the research conducted by Choirun Ahmadi although both use management quality but the research Choirun Ahmadi more focus on service to the external customer primer 69 Moh. Abdul Muchlis, 2010. Implemenation Quality Improvement Management In Pondok Pesantren Darul Ulum Rejoso Peterongan Jombang Jawa Timur 70 Choirun Ahmadi, 2009. Implemanation Quality System management In Wonosari Gunungkidul 2 State Vocatioal High School 64 students and the implementation from the point of view of Total Management TQM, satisfaction the primary external customers and analyzed with the SWOT technique. The reserach was of course different from the research that the author will do, namely quality assurance management of graduates activities to improve the quality of graduates in Maarif NU Bobotsari vocational high school and Muhammadiyah 2 Purbalingga vocational high school. Thus, it can be concluded that this research is a new one. 65 66 67 The Quality Assurance Management of Graduates 1. What is the form of quality assurance management of graduates? 2. What are the steps to reach quality assurance management of graduates 3. What is the assesment of quality assurance management of graduates?

C. Research Design