Introduction 2. Material and methods

224 F . Madec et al. Livestock Production Science 63 2000 223 –233 ´ ´ ` ´ ´ atteints ne sont pas retires du groupe. Les medicaments s’averent inefficaces. Les lesions affectent differents organes: les ` ´ ` ´ ´ ¨ poumons, la rate, les reins et surtout les ganglions lymphatiques ou on observe une severe depletion lymphoıde. La maladie ` ` ´ ´ ´ ´ ne possede pas d’expression collective. Les premieres donnees epidemiologiques mettent en relief une susceptibilite accrue ´ ´ ´ de certaines portees. Le virus du SDRP est exclu comme agent causal au benefice d’un circovirus porcin PCV2. Les ´ ´ ´ ´ ´ conditions d’environnement offertes aux animaux sont suspectees decisives dans la severite de l’impact de la maladie dans ´ les elevages.  2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords : Wasting syndrome; Pig; Postweaning; Epidemiology; PMWS

1. Introduction 2. Material and methods

Late in Spring 1996, two farmers complained 2.1. The farms about unexpected mortality occurring in growing pigs in Brittany France. The pigs were two to three Farms were selected by field veterinarians. The months old and no obvious other health disturbance latter, in turn, had been called to these farms because could be detected in the farms. In a preliminary of high and persistent mortality in weaned pigs study, piglets showing the first clinical signs of despite medication. The authors visited the farms and wasting were transferred to our experimental their selection was based on the willingness of the facilities and SPF pigs of the same age were placed farmer to co-operate and also on the availability of in contact. Surprisingly, the wasting piglets pro- information. Twelve farms in the western part of gressively recovered without any medication, whilst France working with six different farm organisations the contact SPF pigs became severely ill. They co-operatives were included in the survey. They developed typical Glasser’s disease. At that time the were all farrow-to-finish operations like the majority situation was rather confusing. Porcine Respiratory of farms in the area. On 11 farms the replacement and Reproductive Syndrome PRRS was detected gilts came from a multiplier. On the other the on those farms affected by the piglet wasting prob- replacement stock was home-produced. Artificial lem as well as several other enzootic agents includ- insemination from bought-in specialised AI centres ing M . hyopneumoniae, P. multocida, H. parasuis, S. was widely used. The average herd size was 343 suis and enterotoxigenic E . coli. During the second sows range 105–600. Eleven farms had intensive half of 1996 we tried to determine the presence or confined production slatted floor, fan ventilated absence of the specific new syndrome. Field case rooms and on one Farm 2, Table 1 the sows were observations, often associated with experimental kept outdoors. The productivity of the herds was trials, were designed. By the end of 1996 we came to good 24.4 piglets weaned sow year. Age at wean- the conclusion that since the condition could be ing was either 26–28 days n 5 7 herds or 21 days transmitted to naive pigs in our facilities Le Cann et on average n 5 5 herds. They were free of Pseu- al., 1998, it was infectious and transmissible. Final- dorabies but 9 of them were PRRS positive. Herds ly, the syndrome clinical signs, macroscopic lesions, No. 2, 8 and 10 were PRRS free. histopathology was recognised as being similar to the descriptions made in North America and called 2.2. The protocol on the farms ‘‘Postweaning Multisystemic Wasting Syndrome’’ Harding, 1996, Clark, 1996. Since then, an exten- The protocol applied across the 12 farms was sive research programme has been performed. The designed to achieve two objectives. Firstly to char- present paper reports a series of field surveys and acterise PMWS which was new to France. No laboratory investigations. serological test was available so we focused on other F . Madec et al. Livestock Production Science 63 2000 223 –233 225 Table 1 Postweaning Multisystemic Wasting Syndrome: impact in 12 farms in France a b b Farm Size Productivity Age at mortality before mortality over the Predominant overall clinical signs c Nb sows piglets weaned weaning wasting disease 3 month period after associated with wasting sow year days one year period wasting disease occurred 1 500 24 27.3 6.5 14.6 Diarrhoea 1 respiratory disorders 2 120 26.5 27.2 4 20.5 Diarrhoea 1 respiratory disorders 3 250 23.8 26.8 4.3 18.7 Respiratory 4 600 26.2 20.3 4.8 11.3 Not clear 5 250 24.3 21 5.1 19.6 Diarrhoea 1 respiratory 6 360 23.5 26.9 4.7 12.1 Diarrhoea 1 respiratory 7 300 24.3 28 3.8 10.2 Respiratory 8 105 24.8 26.9 3.7 12.8 Diarrhoea 1 respiratory 8 500 23.5 21 5.5 19.3 Diarrhoea 1 respiratory 11 220 24.5 27 3.2 12 Respiratory 11 600 25.2 21.1 5.6 13 Diarrhoea 1 respiratory 12 320 24.2 27 3.9 11 Not clear TOTAL 343 24.4 24.5 4.6 14.6 a Farrow-to-finish farms. b Mortality for any reason from weaning to slaughter. c Individual signs: unthriftiness, pallor, etc . . . were present but not indicated here laboratory examinations and clinical observations. On most of the farms, there were numerous Retrospectively, the 12 farms were diagnosed as differences in husbandry. On four farms 3, 4, 7 and having PMWS on histopathology and by in situ 9 the hygiene policy, space per pig, ventilation, hybridisation using a specific circovirus type II segregation of subsequent batches and mixing of pigs probe. The second objective was to investigate the varied and changes occurred at the different stages epidemiology of PMWS and to try to build up suckling, weaning, fattening. The objective was not hygiene proposals for the affected farms cohort to test the relevance of each of these changes but to studies were carried out on these farms. The piglets look at the overall consequences of a global come- were identified at birth. They were weighed at back to standard recommendations ITP, 1993; weaning and then, at different times depending on Madec et al., 1999. the farms. On farm 9, early weaning was carried out. Within the whole group of 12 farms, the prod- The cohorts one or two per farm were visited by us uctivity and mortality data were recorded. All the every 14 days. The farmer was asked to take special herds were managed according to a batch system care with recording signs of illness, medications, groups of sows weaned the same day every 3 death etc. If illness occurred numerous ‘‘extra weeks; each week for the largest units, ITP, 1993 visits’’ were scheduled. A proportion of the pigs and therefore we were able to know retrospectively dying were necropsied at the laboratory. At the end the evolution of mortality in the subsequent groups of the critical period the pigs were weighed and bled. of contemporary pigs. On three farms 5, 6 and 7 a more detailed protocol was applied since the pigs were visited every 2 days 2.3. The protocol at the laboratory on average during the critical phase. Rectal tempera- ture was recorded in a group of 40 pigs randomly At the laboratory, the pigs were euthanased and selected. The pigs were weighed at weaning, at 8 subjected to a standard necropsy. Bacteriological weeks of age and at 12 weeks. On each occasion examination was performed on the tonsils and on they were blood sampled. An additional blood certain viscera showing gross lesions: particularly the sampling took place later at about 16–18 weeks. lungs and the lymph nodes. 226 F . Madec et al. Livestock Production Science 63 2000 223 –233 Histopathology was undertaken with special em- 3.2. The overall results of the cohort studies phasis on lymphoid tissues associated with lung and intestine. Viral inclusions were looked for following The total number of pigs considered was 3078. the protocol of Ellis et al. 1998. Three hundred and thirty eight 11 died or were Lastly, an in situ hybridisation specific for cir- sacrificed principally for animal welfare reasons. Fig. covirus Type II, was performed in cases where there 1 shows the mortality according to their age. The was microscopic damage. twelfth week was the most critical and 68 of the losses occurred during weeks 11–13. Signs of illness were noticed in all the piglets before death. When

3. Results recorded, rectal temperature was found to be 40.5