Discussion Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:L:Livestock Production Science:Vol62.Issue2.Jan2000:

136 Y .-L. Yin et al. Livestock Production Science 62 2000 133 –141 Table 1 Ileal recovery of TiO and Cr O 2 2 3 Diet W WR WM WB S.E.D. P Mean a a a b PVTC TiO 99.9 94.9 95.5 67.8 4.92 , 0.001 89.7 2 a a a b Cr O 84.9 87.4 82.8 60.6 4.69 , 0.001 79.0 2 3 IRA TiO 98.8 ND 101.1 95.2 2.70 NS 98.4 2 Cr O 84.3 ND 88.7 86.8 2.39 NS 86.8 2 3 PVTC: Measured with PVTC total collection method. IRA: Measured with IRA method. a,b Values in the same row without a common superscript are significantly different P , 0.05. ND: Not determined. Table 2 TiO and IRA methods for W, WR and WM but the 2 Comparison of average values of ileal apparent digestibility of high fibre WB diet resulted in higher estimates of nutrients in diets W, WR, WM and WB measured with PVTC apparent digestibility by the total collection method. cannula and either TiO or Cr O 2 2 3 TiO Cr O S.E.D. P 2 2 3 DM 0.702 0.671 0.0095 , 0.001

4. Discussion

CP 0.772 0.748 0.0081 , 0.001 Energy 0.710 0.680 0.0084 , 0.001 4.1. Comparison of Cr O and TiO as markers 2 3 2 Threonine 0.747 0.72 0.0092 , 0.001 for determination of ileal apparent digestibility of Valine 0.748 0.722 0.0074 , 0.001 Cystine 0.785 0.760 0.0083 , 0.001 nutrients Methionine 0.888 0.880 0.0039 , 0.05 Isoleucine 0.810 0.790 0.0042 , 0.001 Low faecal recoveries of Cr O and TiO ranging 2 3 2 Leucine 0.820 0.801 0.0052 , 0.001 from 71 to 85 in pigs have been often reported in Tyrosine 0.831 0.814 0.0048 , 0.001 the literature Mueller, 1956; Moore, 1957, 1959; Phenylalanine 0.923 0.812 0.0199 , 0.001 Lysine 0.819 0.800 0.0054 , 0.001 Ishikawa, 1966; Ishikawa and Sugimura, 1973; Histidine 0.850 0.834 0.0055 , 0.001 Moughan et al., 1991; Greer, 1992; McClean, 1993; Arginine 0.883 0.870 0.0042 , 0.001 Yin et al., 2000. The present results show that the Aspartic acid 0.756 0.730 0.0091 , 0.001 ileal recoveries of TiO and Cr O are much higher 2 2 3 Serine 0.812 0.792 0.0073 , 0.001 than those at the faecal level. For example, the ileal Glutamic acid 0.892 0.881 0.0036 , 0.001 Proline 0.787 0.763 0.0061 , 0.001 recoveries of TiO and Cr O measured with the 2 2 3, Glycine 0.721 0.690 0.0086 , 0.001 IRA method, were 12.6 and 5.3 percentage units Alanine 0.719 0.688 0.0054 , 0.001 higher, respectively, than the overall faecal re- Total AAs 0.817 0.798 0.0061 , 0.001 coveries of TiO and Cr O observed by Yin et al. 2 2 3 2000. The nearly 100 ileal recovery of TiO for 2 gestibility for diet WM the results for PVTC using the low fibre diets W, WR and the medium fibre diet TiO and for IRA were very similar, and, in line WM obtained with the PVTC and IRA pigs indicates 2 with the expected effects of fibre, values declined that the disappearance of TiO observed by Greer 2 from diet W to diet WB. Similar to the results for the 1992; McClean 1993 and Yin et al. 2000 did digestibility of DM, CP and energy, ileal apparent not occur at the ileal level. This suggests that the digestibilities of amino acids were also comparable lower recovery of marker in faeces is due to marker between the PVTC TiO and IRA techniques, retention, or absorption or both in the large intestine. 2 except for valine, phenylalanine and proline. Values The reasons for retention and absorption in the large for the DM, CP, gross energy and AA with PVTC intestine of pigs may be a combination of the long using Cr O were lower than for the other methods. retention time 36 h of digesta Kidder and Man- 2 3 PVTC by total collection agreed well with the PVTC ners, 1978, the complex and capacious structure of Y .-L. Yin et al. Livestock Production Science 62 2000 133 –141 137 Table 3 Comparison of ileal apparent digestibility of DM, CP, gross energy and selected AAs measured either with markers TiO or Cr O using 2 2 3 PVTC-cannula or by total collection PVTC or IRA a Diet TiO Cr O PVTC S.E.D. Diet 3 method IRA 2 2 3 DM W 0.773 0.741 0.772 0.763 WR 0.766 0.752 0.783 ND WM 0.673 0.632 0.688 0.0155 P , 0.001 0.624 WB 0.594 0.556 0.732 0.597 CP W 0.807 0.779 0.807 0.811 WR 0.804 0.790 0.808 ND WM 0.757 0.727 0.769 0.0311 P , 0.05 0.747 WB 0.720 0.693 0.808 0.745 Gross energy W 0.787 0.757 0.777 0.784 WR 0.771 0.759 0.792 ND WM 0.683 0.644 0.698 0.0142 P , 0.001 0.656 WB 0.596 0.558 0.724 0.601 Threonine W 0.77 0.737 0.768 0.764 WR 0.767 0.753 0.785 ND WM 0.743 0.71 0.756 0.0128 P , 0.001 0.732 WB 0.708 0.68 0.794 0.702 Valine W 0.766 0.733 0.764 0.805 WR 0.777 0.763 0.793 ND WM 0.749 0.717 0.761 0.0123 P , 0.001 0.769 WB 0.701 0.673 0.797 0.756 Isoleucine W 0.831 0.808 0.83 0.843 WR 0.837 0.826 0.848 ND WM 0.803 0.778 0.813 0.0093 P , 0.001 0.815 WB 0.768 0.746 0.841 0.8 Leucine W 0.849 0.827 0.849 0.851 WR 0.841 0.832 0.853 ND WM 0.807 0.783 0.817 0.0121 P , 0.001 0.82 WB 0.78 0.76 0.85 0.807 Phenylalanine W 0.935 0.83 0.85 0.876 WR 0.935 0.846 0.865 ND WM 0.918 0.797 0.828 0.0068 P , 0.001 0.851 WB 0.904 0.777 0.861 0.834 Lysine W 0.843 0.811 0.834 0.844 WR 0.832 0.822 0.845 ND WM 0.82 0.797 0.829 0.0093 P , 0.001 0.833 WB 0.786 0.767 0.855 0.807 Histidine W 0.865 0.845 0.864 0.869 WR 0.863 0.855 0.872 ND WM 0.847 0.827 0.854 0.0075 P , 0.001 0.865 WB 0.825 0.808 0.882 0.848 138 Y .-L. Yin et al. Livestock Production Science 62 2000 133 –141 Table 3. Continued a Diet TiO Cr O PVTC S.E.D. Diet 3 method IRA 2 2 3 Tyrosine W 0.849 0.828 0.849 0.851 WR 0.853 0.844 0.863 ND WM 0.833 0.813 0.841 0.0082 P , 0.001 0.858 WB 0.789 0.771 0.856 0.834 Arginine W 0.887 0.871 0.887 0.908 WR 0.882 0.875 0.89 ND WM 0.886 0.871 0.89 0.0062 P , 0.001 0.901 WB 0.876 0.865 0.917 0.895 Aspartic acid W 0.777 0.746 0.776 0.799 WR 0.779 0.765 0.796 ND WM 0.751 0.72 0.764 0.012 P , 0.001 0.769 WB 0.716 0.689 0.807 0.75 Serine W 0.834 0.81 0.833 0.836 WR 0.837 0.827 0.849 ND WM 0.8 0.775 0.81 0.009 P , 0.001 0.801 WB 0.779 0.757 0.85 0.786 Glutamic acids W 0.909 0.897 0.908 0.912 WR 0.908 0.902 0.915 ND WM 0.879 0.863 0.885 0.0066 P , 0.001 0.873 WB 0.873 0.861 0.913 0.879 Proline W 0.768 0.731 0.83 0.891 WR 0.881 0.874 0.732 ND WM 0.763 0.733 0.763 0.0247 P , 0.001 0.858 WB 0.709 0.683 0.77 0.854 Glycine W 0.749 0.712 0.745 0.784 WR 0.742 0.726 0.761 ND WM 0.717 0.679 0.73 0.0157 P , 0.001 0.74 WB 0.675 0.644 0.782 0.732 Alanine W 0.737 0.7 0.735 0.77 WR 0.75 0.734 0.769 ND WM 0.719 0.683 0.732 0.0144 P , 0.001 0.741 WB 0.666 0.635 0.773 0.714 Total AAs W 0.833 0.81 0.832 0.856 WR 0.851 0.846 0.856 ND WM 0.808 0.784 0.817 0.0091 P , 0.001 0.825 WB 0.783 0.764 0.854 0.814 a IRA not included in statistical analysis, since the experimental design was different from the PVTC experiment. ND: Not determined. the large intestine Barnicoat, 1945; Moore, 1957; and Monaghan 1996 the present results highlight 1959 and the high specific gravity of TiO and the problems of use of Cr O as a marker. Mean 2 2 3 Cr O Lide and Frederikse, 1995. values of the ileal recovery of Cr O measured with 2 3 2 3 In common with the studies of McCarthy et al. the IRA method was only 87 in this study. 1974, Moughan et al. 1991, Jagger et al. 1992 Consequently the ileal digestibility of DM, CP, Y .-L. Yin et al. Livestock Production Science 62 2000 133 –141 139 energy and total AA measured with Cr O were Cr O TiO is insoluble in water, HCl, HNO or 2 3 2 3, 2 3 respectively 4.6, 3.2, 4.4 and 2.4 lower than those dilute H SO Merck Index, 1989 and analysis of 2 4 measured with TiO Table 2. Jagger et al. 1992 TiO is a relatively simple and straightforward 2 2 found that the ileal digestibilities of N and AAs procedure. High recoveries 95–100 in samples of measured with Cr O were significantly lower N, feeds and excreta of poultry and pigs have been 2 3 6.7 and the average value of 11 AAs, 6.1 than reported Njaa, 1961; Leone, 1973; Peddie et al., those measured with TiO , when both markers were 1982; Jagger et al., 1992. 2 added to a barley and wheat based diet fed to growing and finishing pigs. Furthermore, the results 4.2. Comparison of methods for measurement of of Jagger et al. 1992 and of this experiment show ileal apparent digestibility of nutrients that the standard errors associated with apparent ileal digestibility values calculated using each marker The excellent marker recoveries with TiO for the 2 were lower with TiO than with Cr O This is W, WR and WM with the PVTC method and for the 2 2 3. somewhat surprising in that the level of incorpora- W, WM and WB diets with the IRA method indicate tion of Cr O was higher than for TiO At these low that, under these conditions, digesta collection was 2 3 2. levels it would be possible for problems to arise due fully representative of the material reaching the to lack of homogeneity of mixing. However, the low terminal ileum. This would be expected with the IRA standard errors obtained with TiO would suggest method where a complete 5-d collection was made 2 that diet mixing was not a problem. but it is noteworthy that similar results occurred with The primary reason for the low recovery and the much shorter period of collection 24 h using the variable results from Cr O may be related to PVTC technique. However, the result for the high- 2 3 analytical problems arising mainly from interference fibre diet WB using the PVTC technique demon- by other minerals present in the sample Williams et strates that quantitative collection of digesta was not al., 1962; Saha and Gilbreath, 1991. For example, achieved. This result therefore supports the reports of ¨ Williams et al. 1962 found a 12 decrease in Cr Kohler et al. 1991 and van Leeuwen et al. 1991 recovery when phosphate PO was added to the of variable recovery with the PVTC technique 4 solution of Cr. Saha and Gilbreath 1991 also dependant on diet composition and confirms the showed significant effects on recovery when varying necessity of using an appropriate indigestible marker. the concentration of Ca, P or Mg in diets and faeces Although a direct statistical comparison of the of pigs. These minerals occur in high concentrations PVTC and IRA techniques is not valid due to the in the digesta or faeces of pigs. This possibility is separate locations in which the techniques were used presently under investigation in our laboratory. In an and the different sources of pigs, the results given in initial study, three levels of Cr O corresponding to Table 3 for PVTC TiO and IRA show close 2 3 2 5, 10, 20 ppm were added to the faeces of pigs which numerical agreement. This, taken with the excellent had not received Cr O in the diet. The recoveries marker recoveries Table 1, suggests that both 2 3 were 88.0, 87.7, 83.3, respectively. This is similar methods were giving reliable estimates of ileal to the mean recovery values reported by Saha and digestibility. Furthermore, the good agreement be- Gilbreath 1991 and the mean ileal recovery of tween IRA and PVTC TiO for diet WB, where 2 Cr O measured in this study. PVTC collection was not quantitative, suggests that 2 3 In addition, although Cr O is insoluble in water, the digesta recovered was similar in composition to 2 3 it is slightly soluble in acids and alkalis Merck that by-passing the cannula. Index, 1989 and therefore it might be soluble to a As discussed in the Introduction, the main advan- certain extent in the acid or alkaline digestive juices tage of the end-to-end IRA technique is that it is a of the gastrointestinal tract of pigs Moore, 1959 or quantitative method for collecting ileal digesta and, the acid solution used during Cr analysis. Saha and therefore, it is not necessary to use any marker for Gilbreath 1991 suggested that the soluble Cr might calculating digestibility. However, compared with be lost due to the formation of volatile Cr com- the PVTC method, the main disadvantages are: 1 pounds at the sample digestion stage. Compared with relatively complex surgical procedures and post- 140 Y .-L. Yin et al. Livestock Production Science 62 2000 133 –141 beans in diets for growing pigs. M.Sc. Thesis. The Queen’s operative animal care. 2 Longer time for recovery University of Belfast, Belfast. from the surgery. 3 Need for greater care to ¨ Hennig, U., Noel, R., Herrmann, U., Wunsche, J., Mehnert, E., minimise skin irritation and discomfort due to the 1986. Nutrition–physiologic studies in pigs with ileo-rectal outpouring of digesta around the hind legs. 4 The anastomoses. 1. Operation methods, biochemical and mor- phological findings. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 36, 585–596. need for additional water, minerals and vitamins to ¨ Hennig, U., Wunsche, J., Souffrant, W.B., Borgmann, E., offset the loss of the large intestine. Compared with Kreienbring, F., 1992. Methodenverleich zur Bestimmung der the IRA method, the surgery for the PVTC cannula- ˇ ˇ ˇ ˇ PrSzSkalen NShrstoffverdaulichkeit und AminosSureresorption tion is much easier to perform and less severe on the ˇ zwischen Schweinen mit ileorectal-anastomose und ileozSkal- ¨ ¨ Bruckenkanule. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 42, 197–211. animals than the IRA procedure and the PVTC Ishikawa, S., 1966. Reliability of polyethyleneglycol as an in- cannulation technique causes less discomfort to the dicator for digestion studies with swine. 1. Rate of passage of animal. Furthermore this method permits simulta- polyethyleneglycol through the digestive tract. Agric. Biol. neous measurement of ileal and overall digestibility Chem. 30, 278–284. in contrast to the IRA method. Taking all of these Ishikawa, S., Sugimura, K., 1973. Movement of polyethylalcohol through the digestive tract as a digestion indicator with swine. aspects into account it is concluded that the PVTC Agric. Biol. Chem. 37, 203–206. method is a better method for measuring ileal Jagger, S., Wiseman, J., Cole, D.J.A., Craigon, J., 1992. Evalua- digestibility in most situations. It would, however, be tion of inert markers for the determination of ileal and faecal of considerable interest to make a direct comparison digestibility values in the pig. Br. J. Nutr. 68, 729–739. of the PVTC and SICV techniques. Kidder, D.E., Manners, M.J., 1978. Digestion in the Pig, Kingston Press, Bath. ¨ Kohler, T., Huisman, J., Den Hartog, L.A., Mosenthin, R., 1990. Comparison of different digesta collection methods to de-

5. Conclusions