Table of the analysis result

45

4.4. Table of the analysis result

The result of the analysis is drawn in the table below that explains in detail, the frequency, and the classification of Directive Illocutionary Act. NO. Types of Directive Illocutionary Acts Frequency of Occurrence in filmThe Pursuit of Happyness 1. Direct Directives 43 2. Indirect Directives 11 3. Group A : Directive Expressed In Verbal Questions 3 4. Group B : Directive Expressed With Verb In The Stem a. Directive of group B without a subject 21 b. Directive of group B with subject 4 c. Directive of group B with let 3 d. Negative directive of group B 4 Total Group B Directive Expressed with Verb in The Stem 32 5. Group C : Directive Expressed in Pronominal Question 1 6. Group D : Directive Expressed In Statement 5 Total Directive Illocutionary Acts 95 Universitas Sumatera Utara 46 The table above shows us that there are 95 cases of Directive Illocutionary Acts which presence in the film The Pursuit of Happyness. The order of each utterances in the verses of this film are:  43 utterances for direct directives  32 utterances for group B directive expressed with verb in the stem and it is divided into: o 21 utterances for directive of group B without a subject o 4 utterances for directive of group B with subject o 3 utterances for directive of group B with let o 4 utterances for negative directive of group B  11 utterances for indirect directives  5 utterances for group D : directive expressed in statement  3 utterances for group A : directive expressed in verbal questions  1 utterance for group C : directive expressed in pronominal questions It can be concluded from the number of the utterances in directive illocutionary act that has the highest percentage of all is the presence of Direct Directives. Universitas Sumatera Utara 47

5. CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

5.1 Conclusions

After doing this analysis the writer draw some conclusion in which as the writer mentioned above Language is used in all sides of human life to ask, to give command, to invite, to deceive someone, and so on. Shortly, language can be used to do something, and language is used in doing something. In linguistic communication he involvement of the two meanings will still be added by considering the sense in which to say something is to do something, or in saying something we do something; and even by saying we do something. In the theory of pragmatics, there are three types of act which are called speech acts or linguistic acts, they are locutionary acts, illocutionary acts, and perlocutionary acts. Speech acts as the central concern of pragmatic study, is defined as the study of how to do things with words. When we are speaking a language, we are performing speech acts such as giving command, making statement and so on. As pragmatics concerns wih the sudy of utterance-meaning, the object of this study, therefore, is mostly concentrated on the spoken language, and the language to be spoken such as in some of literary works, dialogue, and so on, where context is considered. Directive is the act where the speaker attempts to get the hearer to do something. Typical examples of directives are ordering, requesting, commanding and pleading. Directives are considered to have competitive illocutionary function. It deals with negative politeness especially for direct directives, such as close the window; whereas some directives may refer as inviting so that it will involve no or less negative politeness of the speaker towards the hearer. Therefore, directives include not simply order and request but more subtly invite, dare, and challenge. This fact of direct illocutionary acts certainly makes the writer interest to Universitas Sumatera Utara