45
4.4. Table of the analysis result
The result of the analysis is drawn in the table below that explains in detail, the frequency, and the classification of Directive Illocutionary Act.
NO. Types of Directive Illocutionary Acts
Frequency of Occurrence in filmThe Pursuit of Happyness
1. Direct Directives
43 2. Indirect
Directives 11
3. Group A : Directive Expressed In Verbal
Questions 3
4. Group B : Directive Expressed With Verb In
The Stem a.
Directive of group B without a subject 21 b.
Directive of group B with subject 4
c. Directive of group B with let
3 d.
Negative directive of group B 4
Total Group B Directive Expressed with Verb in The Stem
32
5. Group C : Directive Expressed in Pronominal
Question 1
6. Group D : Directive Expressed In Statement
5 Total Directive Illocutionary Acts
95
Universitas Sumatera Utara
46 The table above shows us that there are 95 cases of Directive Illocutionary
Acts which presence in the film The Pursuit of Happyness. The order of each utterances in the verses of this film are:
43 utterances for direct directives
32 utterances for group B directive expressed with verb in the stem and it is
divided into: o
21 utterances for directive of group B without a subject o
4 utterances for directive of group B with subject o
3 utterances for directive of group B with let o
4 utterances for negative directive of group B
11 utterances for indirect directives
5 utterances for group D : directive expressed in statement
3 utterances for group A : directive expressed in verbal questions
1 utterance for group C : directive expressed in pronominal questions It can be concluded from the number of the utterances in directive
illocutionary act that has the highest percentage of all is the presence of Direct Directives.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
47
5. CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
5.1 Conclusions
After doing this analysis the writer draw some conclusion in which as the writer mentioned above Language is used in all sides of human life to ask, to give
command, to invite, to deceive someone, and so on. Shortly, language can be used to do something, and language is used in doing something. In linguistic communication
he involvement of the two meanings will still be added by considering the sense in which to say something is to do something, or in saying something we do something;
and even by saying we do something. In the theory of pragmatics, there are three types of act which are called speech acts or linguistic acts, they are locutionary acts,
illocutionary acts, and perlocutionary acts. Speech acts as the central concern of pragmatic study, is defined as the study of how to do things with words. When we are
speaking a language, we are performing speech acts such as giving command, making statement and so on. As pragmatics concerns wih the sudy of utterance-meaning, the
object of this study, therefore, is mostly concentrated on the spoken language, and the language to be spoken such as in some of literary works, dialogue, and so on, where
context is considered. Directive is the act where the speaker attempts to get the hearer to do something. Typical examples of directives are ordering, requesting,
commanding and pleading. Directives are considered to have competitive illocutionary function. It deals with negative politeness especially for direct directives,
such as close the window; whereas some directives may refer as inviting so that it will involve no or less negative politeness of the speaker towards the hearer. Therefore,
directives include not simply order and request but more subtly invite, dare, and challenge. This fact of direct illocutionary acts certainly makes the writer interest to
Universitas Sumatera Utara