Interrogative Sentences Theoretical Description

This research focused on the use of interrogative questions. In interrogative questions, each question word has a specific function. The function and the example of interrogative questions are explained in table 2.1. Table 2.1. The Table of WH Question’s Function and Example Question Word Function Example what asking for information about something What is your name asking for repetition or confirmation What? I cant hear you. You did what? what...for asking for a reason, asking why What did you do that for? when asking about time When did he leave? where asking in or at what place or position Where do they live? which asking about choice Which colour do you want? who asking what or which person or people subject Who opened the door? whom asking what or which person or people object Whom did you see? whose asking about ownership Whose keys are these? Whose turn is it? Why asking for reason, asking what...for Why do you say that? why dont making a suggestion Why dont I help you? How asking about manner How does this work? asking about condition or quality How was your exam? how + adjadv asking about extent or degree see examples below how far Distance How far is Pattaya from Bangkok? how long length time or space How long will it take? how many quantity countable How many cars are there? how much quantity uncountable How much money do you have? how old Age How old are you? how come informal asking for reason, asking why How come I cant see her? Retrived from http:www.englishclub.comvocabularywh-question-words.htm

2. Definition of Bloom’s Taxonomy

According to Anderson Krathwohl 2001 in The Taxonomy of Educational Objective, Bloom’s Taxonomy is a classification of the different objectives and skills that educators set for students. The theory was proposed by Benjamin Bloom, an educational psychologist at the University of Chicago in 1956. There are two versions of Bloom’s Taxonomy; the original one and the revised version. Both versions of Bloom’s Taxonomy can be seen in diagram 2.1. below. Figure 2.6. Comparison between Old and New Version of Bloom’s Taxonomy There are some changes in terms that occur between both versions of Bloom’s Taxonomy. The names of six major categories were changed from noun to verb forms. As the taxonomy reflects different forms of thinking and thinking is an active process, verbs were used rather than nouns. The subcategories of the six major categories were also replaced by verbs and some subcategories were reorganised. The knowledge category was renamed. Knowledge was an outcome or product of thinking not a form of thinking. Consequently, the word knowledge was inapropriate to subscribe a category of thinking and was replaced with the word remembering instead. Comprehension and synthesis were retitled to understanding and creating respectively, in order to better reflect the nature of the thinking defined in each category. retrieved from http:rite.ed.qut.edu.auoz- teachernettrainingbloom.html In 1990s, Bloom’s Taxonomy was revised by his former student, Lorin Anderson. According to Anderson Krathwohl 2001, Bloom’s Taxonomy is the representatives of three groups: cognitive psychologist, curriculum theorist and instructional researchers, and testing and assessment specialists p.xxviii. The new terms are defined as follows. a Remembering This level is about retrieving, recognizing, and recalling relevant knowledge for long term memory. This level also exibits memory of previously learned material. b Understanding This level is about constructing meaning from oral, written, and graphic messages through interpreting, exemplifying, classifying, summarizing, inferring, comparing, and explaining. This level also demonstrates understanding of facts and idea by stating main idea. c Applying This level is about carrying out or using a procedure through executing, or implementing. This level is also about solving problem to new situations by applying acquired knowledge. d Analyzing This level is about breaking materials into constituent parts, determining how the parts relate to one another and to an overall structure or purpose through differentiating, organizing, and attributing. This level is also about making inferences and finding evidence to suport generalizations. e Evaluating This level is about making judgments based on criteria and standards through checking and critiquing. This level also presents and defends opinions using the judgement. f Creating This level is about compiling elements together to form a coherent or functional whole. This level also reorganizes elements into a new pattern or structure through generating, planning, or producing.

3. The Characteristics of Each Bloom’s Level of Learning

In order to measure students’ skill to produce interrogative question using Bloom’s taxonomy, keywords of each level of learning are needed. The keywords as listed in the website www.edupressinc.com are as follows. Table 2.2. The Table of Bloom’s Taxonomy Level 1 and the Keywords LEVEL 1 – REMEMBERING Exhibit memory of previously learned material by recalling facts, terms, basic concepts, and answers. Key Words choose, define, find, how, label, list, match, name, omit, recall, relate, select, show, spell, tell, what, when, where, which, who, why Questions What is …? Where is …? How did ___ happen? Why did …? When did …? How would you show …? Who were the main …? Which one …? How is …? When did ___ happen? How would you explain …? How would you describe ..? Can you recall …? Can you select …? Can you list the three …? Who was …? The first level of revised Bloom’s taxonomy deals with recalling facts, terms, basic concepts, and answers. Therefore, the first level’s keywords include simple verbs such as choose, define, recall, show, and tell. Simple interrogative questions such as what is ...?, where is ...?, who was ...?, and which one ...? are also categorized into this level. Therefore, any interrogative question which consists of those keywords or has similar meaning of those question examples is categorized into this first level. Table 2.3. The Table of Bloom’s Taxonomy Level 2 and the Keywords LEVEL 2 – UNDERSTANDING Demonstrate understanding of facts and ideas by organizing, comparing, translating, interpreting, giving descriptions, and stating main ideas. Key Words classify, compare, contrast, demonstrate, explain, extend, illustrate, infer, interpret, outline, relate, rephrase, show, summarize, translate Questions How would you classify the type of …? How would you compare …? contrast …? Will you state or interpret in your own words …? How would you rephrase the meaning …? What facts or ideas show …? What is the main idea of …? Which statements support …? Can you explain what is happening …? what is meant …? What can you say about …? Which is the best answer …? How would you summarize …? Level 2 of Bloom’s taxonomy deals with organizing, comparing, translating, interpreting, giving descriptions, and stating main ideas. The keywords of this Bloom’s taxonomy level includes explain, illustrate, classify, compare, summarize, and translate. Thus, any interrogative question which consists of those keywords or the similar meanings are categorized into the second level of Bloom’s taxonomy. Table 2.4. The Table of Bloom’s Taxonomy Level 3 and the Keywords LEVEL 3 – APPLYING Solve problems to new situations by applying acquired knowledge, facts, techniques and rules in a different way.