Continued on the next page
46
No Researcher
Year Title
Similarity Difference
Result Summary
5 Nor hawani,
Mustaffa M. Zain and
Norashfah Hanim Al-Haj
2011 CSR Disclosures and
Its Determinants: Evidence from
Malaysian Government Link Companies.
1. Variable: Company size
log of total asset.
2. Time horizon is time series.
3. Method: Multiple
Regression Analysis.
1. Variable:
Company age, profitability net profit
after tax over sales, leverage total
liabilitiestotal assets.
2. Categories of CSR reporting using 4
categories Belkaoui Karpik, 1999 namely:
social disclosure scale by ernst and ernst
1973, percentage of prose in annual report,
quality of disclosure in annual report and
quantity of disclosure in annual report.
3. Object is GLCs listed on the Malaysian Stock
Exchange. The study found only
company size has positive significant relationship with
CSR reporting. Thus, other variables, on the other hand,
show an insignificant relationship. Therefore, this
rejects the assumption that age, profitability and
leverage can influence the level of CSR reporting.
Meanwhile, F test shows that independent variables
have the significant influence toward level of
CSR reporting.
Continued on the next page
47
No Researcher
Year Title
Similarity Difference
Result Summary
6 Prem Lal Joshi
and Simon S.Gao 2009
Multinational Corporations’
Corporate Social and Environmental
Disclosures CSED on Web Sites.
1. Variable: Company size
log of total asset.
2. Method: Multiple
Regression Analysis.
1. Variable: Company size log of
total asset log of total equity,
profitability ROA, debt ratio Risk,
auditor big4 and non- big4, country effect
origin USA or non- USA, industry type
manufacture versus services.
2. Categories of CSR reporting using 2
categories namely social and
enviromental.
3. Object is multinational MNC on websites
year 2005. 4. Time horizon is cross
sectional. This research explains that
68.83 percent of the companies were audited by
Big4 audit firms and the rest by non-Big4 where auditor
size has relationship with CSED. Log of assets and
profitability are significant variables that influence
CSED on websites.
Continued on the next page
48
No Researcher
Year Title
Similarity Difference
Result Summary
7 Sylvia
Veronica Siregar and
Yanivi Bachtiar
2010
Corporate Social Reporting: Empirical
Evidence from Indonesia Stock
Exchange. 1. Variable:
Board size board of commissioner,
company size log of total asset,
profitability ROE, leverage
DER.
2. Categories of CSR reporting
using 6 categories Nor
Hadi, 2011 that are:
environmental, community,
energy, employee,
product, other.
3. Method: Multiple
Regression Analysis.
1. Variable: Board size board of
commissioner and board of director,
foreign ownership.
2. To measure CSR using CSR reporting index
CSDI and CSR disclosure length
CSDL.
3. Object is public firms year 2003.
4. Time horizon is cross sectional.
Evidence was found that board size positively affects
CSR reporting and also relationship between board
size and CSR reporting in concave board
commissioners
’ size has positive and concave
relationship with CSDI, whereas
, board of directors’ size has a positive and
concave relationship with CSDL. Foreign ownership,
Profitability and leverage have no significant affect on
CSR reporting. Only firm size has a positive effect on
CSR reporting. Then, as simultaneous, all
independent variables can influence the level of CSR
reporting.
Continued on the next page
49
No Researcher
Year Title
Similarity Difference
Result Summary
8 Tamoi Janggu,
Corina Joseph, and Nero Madi
2007 The Current State of
Corporate Social Responsibility Among
Industrial Companies in Malaysia.
1. Time horizon is
time series.
1. Variable: Company size
firm’s turnover, profitability ROA,
leverage total liabilitiestotal assets,
audit Firm, ownership, directorship new.
2. Categories of CSR reporting using 4
themes human resources, community
involvement, product and environment.
3. Object is industrial companies listed on the
Malaysian Stock Exchange MSE year
1998-2003. CSR reporting is positively
related to firm size and profitability. While, there is
negative relationship between CSR reporting and
leverage. Size of audit firm indicated that it does not
have influence on CSR level. Then, as
simultaneous, all independent variables can
influence the level of CSR reporting.
50
C. Logical Framework
Figure 2.1 Conceptual Framework of Study
Situational Phenomenon: There are some real cases in the field at
national scale about the negative impact of company activities that significantly affect the
problem of social environment and physical environment, which can cause long-term social
cost and borne by society. Theoritical Phenomenon:
The government Indonesia’s House of
Representatives issued Limited Liability Company Law No. 40 year 2007. In article 74
notes that a company having its business activities in the field of andor related to
natural resources shall be obliged to perform its social and environmental responsibility.
Descriptive Statistics “Board Size, Company Size, Profitability and Leverage On Corporate Social
Responsibility Reporting In The Annual Report Empirical Evidence of Mining Companies Listed In Indonesia Stock Exchange Period 2009
– 2011”
Board Size X1 Company Size X2
Profitability X3 Leverage X4
Corporate Social Responsibility
Reporting Y
Conclusion Multiple Regression Analysis Hypothesis Test namely
Determination Coefficient Test, F test and T
test.
Normality Test
Clasical Assumption Test
51
D. Hypothesis
From the explanation concern with this research, hypothesis that can be formulated as follows:
1. Board Size and CSR Reporting