Finding of the Second Cycle a. Planning

41 P = F x 100 N P = 27 x 100 33 P = 81.8 42 Table 4.3 The Students’ Vocabulary Score of Post-Test 2 No. Students’ Name Post-Test Score 1 Students 1 76 2 Students 2 73 3 Students 3 76 4 Students 4 76 5 Students 5 69 6 Students 6 73 7 Students 7 69 8 Students 8 79 9 Students 9 76 10 Students 10 63 11 Students 11 76 12 Students 12 83 13 Students 13 79 14 Students 14 66 15 Students 15 79 16 Students 16 86 17 Students 17 56 18 Students 18 63 19 Students 19 83 20 Students 20 76 21 Students 21 73 22 Students 22 73 23 Students 23 76 24 Students 24 79 25 Students 25 83 26 Students 26 76 27 Students 27 83 28 Students 28 76 29 Students 29 83 30 Students 30 79 31 Students 31 76 32 Students 32 73 33 Students 33 73 MEAN 75.1 Finally, based on the score of the post-test score in the cycle 2 the calculation of the implementation percentage is gained from the following formula: 43 P = y2 – y x100 y P = 75.1 – 59.3 x 100 59.3 P = 26.6 Based on the result of the students’ vocabulary score, there was better improvement of students’ average score from the students’ vocabulary achievement in the preliminary study to the students’ vocabulary in the second cycle. The mean score of the pretest in the preliminary study was 15.1 and the mean score of the students’ score on the first cycle was 48.4. It means that there was 13.9 points or 26.6 of average improvement. The students’ vocabulary improvement from the first cycle to the second cycle recapped in the following chart: Figure 4.1 The Students’ Improvement in Vocabulary Score in the First Cycle to Second Cycle The students who passed the Minimum Mastery Criterion – Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM 70.0 were 27 students or 81.8 it calculated into 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Series 2 Cycle 1 44 class percentage, while 5 out of 33 students 15.1 achieved bellow 70.0 of 33. It indicated that the first criterion of success which required 75 of the students who got at the same as or above the Minimum Mastery Criterion has been achieved. The following was the table of students’ vocabulary score.

d. Reflecting

1. Students activity in making vocabulary cluster and learn from it. In this cycle 2 the researcher and the collaborator reflect about the activity in making and keeping the vocabulary cluster. The students could use vocabulary cluster as their media in memorizing and retaining their vocabulary. 2. Discussing the Result of the Action The result from the students score in this cycle was 81.8 of the students or 27 students got the score above the Minimum Mastery Criterion. After getting the result of the observation note and posttest 2, the researcher and the collaborator carried out the reflection. They felt satisfaction with the result of the action. The result of the posttest 2 showed that 81.8 of the students got the score above the Minimum Mastery Criterion – Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimum KKM. So it has met the first criterion of success that 75 of the students must get the score above the Minimum Mastery Criterion – Kriteria Ketuntasna Minimal KKM. Because of the satisfied result, so the researcher and the collaborator decided to stop the action.

C. Interpretation

In this subtopic will be delivered about the interpretation the result of the research. 1. Based on the data gained from first observation before classroom action research CAR and during the CAR. Based on the result of the students’ participation during teaching and learning process of English vocabulary class through observation note, in observation before CAR it was the technique given by the teacher in teaching vocabulary is not interested for students, the teacher just giving a list of vocabulary and asked them to 45 memorize individually then students could not memorize the vocabulary easily. This problem effect to another problem of students’ proficiency in the skills of English such as their listening, speaking, reading and writing ability, if the students had a little vocabulary they could not speak fluently, or do not understand while listening English and many others because the limitation of their vocabulary. Vocabulary is not one of the skills in learning a language but it is the essential part of language. However, after the students learning vocabulary through vocabulary cluster they feel enjoy and motivated to memorize and learning English. It seen from their enthusiastic and interested in the lesson whiles the teaching learning process and the increase of their understanding and memorizing from their score. 2. Based on the data gained from the pre interview with the English teacher indicated that the students’ vocabulary was poor because the students had some difficulty in memorizing the new word and keeping their last vocabulary. Besides, the students, participation in English vocabulary class was not too active. Therefore, it needed to find the suitable technique in teaching vocabulary. The researcher suggested implementing vocabulary cluster as a strategy in teaching vocabulary. After conducting the action, the English teacher gave positive responses about the action. The English teacher felt satisfied with the improvement made by the students focus on vocabulary score. The English teacher also motivated to use vocabulary cluster technique because it could facilitate the students in retaining their vocabulary. 3. Based on the result of the students’ vocabulary score, it was found out that the students’ vocabulary score was improving. It indicated that the use of vocabulary cluster could increase and motivate to retain and enrich their vocabulary. Most of the students gained good score at the end of each cycle. The students’ average score in preliminary study was 59.3 in the first cycle, and the average score in the first cycle was 68.9 second cycle was 75.1. 46

D. Cycle 1 and 2

The overall finding of the research after accomplishing the classroom action research at SMP Al-Kautsar BKUI found that the good result from implementing Cluster Technique to improve students’ vocabulary. 1. Cycle 1 The finding of the research proved that Clustering Technique can retain students’ vocabulary. It can be seen from the improvement of the students score. The students’ average mean score of pre-test was 59.3. And after the implementation of Clustering Technique, the average mean score of post-test 1 cycle 1 was 68.9. It is mean that there was an improvement of students’ mean score after implementing Clustering technique in the first cycle.

2. Cycle 2

The researcher continued to the second cycle. The mean score was 75.1. The result of the research through Clustering Technique indicated that there was an increase in students’ vocabulary and motivated the students to retain and enrich their vocabulary, from 15.1 in the preliminary study to 81.8 in the second cycle. The result of the second cycle passed the Minimum Mastery Criterion – Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM 70 as the criterion of success determined.The implementation of clustering technique gradually improved students’ vocabulary. Some points that can be concluded from the research is Clustering Technique 1 stimulated the students to memorize and retain their vocabulary easily and enjoy the class activities, 2 increase students’ achievement and motivation, and 3 give a good influence to their four English skills. 47

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

A. Conclusion

After conducting the research and analyzing the data in the process of teaching vocabulary through clustering technique at the second grade of SMP Al- Kautsar BKUI Jakarta, the researcher concluded that vocabulary cluster can be alternative strategy for teacher in teaching vocabulary. It means that there is a significant increase of students’ vocabulary achievement after being taught through clustering technique. Related to the students’ achievement, there were twenty seven students who passed The Minimum Mastery Criterion – Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM 70 with the improvement of students’ means score from pre-test to the post- test of the second cycle in the pre-test, there were only five students who passed the Minimum Mastery Criterion – Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM. Meanwhile, in the post-test of cycle one there were sixteen students who passed the Minimum Mastery Criterion – Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM in which their mean score of vocabulary test. Next in the result of post-test in the cycle two, there gained twenty seven students who passed the Minimum Mastery Criterion – Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM in. So it achieved the criteria of success.

B. Suggestion

Based on the research, there are some suggestions to offer the English teacher and the other researcher based on the research findings. Students Vocabulary Cluster Technique is effective to improve students’ vocabulary Vocabulary Cluster Technique can be alternative to overcome students’ boredom. Teacher This strategy or technique is suggested to the English teacher or other researcher who want to conduct in similar research study.

Dokumen yang terkait

Improving students' writing ability through clustering technique (A classroom action research in the second year of SMP al-hasra Bojongsari- Depok)

4 11 109

Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Report Text through SQ3R Technique (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMAN 1 Parung))

0 7 145

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH WORD CLAP GAME (A Classroom Action Research at the Eighth Grade Students of SMPN 1 Purwasari)

16 86 182

Improving students’ vocabulary through magic english video watching: a classroom action research at the fourth grade of SD AL-FATH Cirendeu

1 18 0

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY THROUGH PATTERN DRILLS TECHNIQUE AT THE FIRST YEAR OF SMP TUNAS HARAPAN BANDAR LAMPUNG (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH)

0 15 65

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION THROUGH VOCABULARY SELF-COLLECTION STRATEGY AT THE EIGHTH GRADE OF SMP N 3 GADING REJO (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH)

1 20 56

IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH INQUIRY- BASED TEACHING (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH INQUIRY- BASED TEACHING (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH AT THE FOURTH YEAR OF SD NEGERI NGABEAN 3 KART

0 0 15

IMPROVING STUDENTS' READING COMPETENCE THROUGH “ACTIVE”(AN ACTION RESEARCH AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMP 1 AL ISLAM KARTASURA).

0 1 7

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ ENGLISH SKILL THROUGH NUMBERED HEADS TECHNIQUE (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH AT THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMP 8 MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA IN 2009 / 2010 ACADEMIC YEAR).

0 0 8

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH SONGS A Classroom Action Research in The Third Grade Students of SD Negeri Tangkil 1 in the Academic Year 20102011

0 1 96