The Technique of Data Analysis

26 In analyzed the test item, the researcher uses to ways to know the trustworthiness of the data follow: 1. Discrimination Power The analysis of discriminating power test items is to know the performance of the test through distinguishing students who have high achievement and low achievement. Discriminating power provides more detailed analysis of the test items than the item difficulty, because it shows how the top score and lower score performed on each item. 8 The computing of discriminating power uses the formula following: 9 D = U-L N In which, D : The index of discriminating power U : The number of pupils in upper group who answered the item correctly L : The number of pupils group who answered item Correctly N : Number of pupils in each group Next, the discriminating power scale uses: Table 3.2 The classification of Discriminating Power DL REMARKS 0.6- 10 Very Good 0.4-0.6 Good 0.1-0.3 Ok -1-0.0 Bad 8 Kathleen M. Bailey, Learning about Language Assessment: Dillemas, Decissions, and Direction London:Heinle Heinle Publisher, 1998, p. 135. 9 Tambunan Willmar, Evaluation of Students Achievement, Jakarta:Depdiknas, 1998, p. 139. 27 2. Difficulty Items The researcher analyzes the students’ test. It categorized into high, medium, and low. In this study the researcher compares the difficulty items analysis by comparing students who answer correctly with all of students who follow the data. The formula which is used is: Table 3.3 The Classification of Difficulty Level DL REMARK 0-0.30 High 0.30-0.79 Medium 0.80-1.00 Low

L. Validity of the Test

“Validity is a measurement instrument which shown whether the instrument valid or not”. 10 It means that validity is one of the crucial conditions in implementing a research including Classroom Action Research CAR. By using the validity, there should be no irrelevant point of misleading in reflecting the data. The researcher uses the Anates to get the validity of the instruments before implementing the test. The test result of pre test instrument shows that the mean was 20.52, the correlation was 0.53 and the reliability of the test was 0.70. The test result of post test 1 instrument shows that the mean was 19.61, the correlation was 0.55 and the reliability of the test was 0.71. The test results of post test 2 instrument shows that the mean was 23.61, the correlation was 0.57 and the reliability test was 0.72. 10 Suharsimi Arikunto, Prosedur penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek, PT Rineka Cipta:Jakarta, 2002, p. 144. 28

CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDINGS AND INTERPRETATION

This chapter presents the finding of research. In this case the way to develop students’ vocabulary through clustering technique. At VIII class of SMP Al-Kautsar BKUI Jakarta. Academic year 200132014. Related to the discussion of the finding, it is divided into three parts. Those are before applying the action, the implementation of the action and discussion of the data after implementation the action.

A. Before Implementing the Action

There are three parts related to the fact-finding before implementing the action. Those are pre interview, pre observation, and pretest. Those explanations as following:

1. The Result of Pre Interviewed

Pre-interview conduct in this study was unstructured interview. The writer asked the question divided into three categories of questions, involving the general condition in English class, especially in vocabulary learning, the strategy in teaching vocabulary used by the teacher, and the difficulties faced by the students in vocabulary learning and asking about clustering strategy. It was held on January 20 th 2014 stated at 10:00 A.M and finished at 11:00 A.M. First category discussed about the general condition in English class especially in vocabulary learning. The teacher said that most of the students who did not like English class gained low competence in English. Besides, they still faced problem in following the English lesson. They thought that English is complicated subject to be learned. The second category discussed about the strategy used by the teacher in teaching vocabulary, the teacher said that sometimes he said the vocabulary and give the meaning of it or finding it in a dictionary. The researcher asked the teacher about vocabulary clustering strategy. He hoped that this technique clustering technique can b e effective in retaining students’ English vocabulary.

Dokumen yang terkait

Improving students' writing ability through clustering technique (A classroom action research in the second year of SMP al-hasra Bojongsari- Depok)

4 11 109

Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Report Text through SQ3R Technique (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMAN 1 Parung))

0 7 145

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH WORD CLAP GAME (A Classroom Action Research at the Eighth Grade Students of SMPN 1 Purwasari)

16 86 182

Improving students’ vocabulary through magic english video watching: a classroom action research at the fourth grade of SD AL-FATH Cirendeu

1 18 0

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY THROUGH PATTERN DRILLS TECHNIQUE AT THE FIRST YEAR OF SMP TUNAS HARAPAN BANDAR LAMPUNG (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH)

0 15 65

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION THROUGH VOCABULARY SELF-COLLECTION STRATEGY AT THE EIGHTH GRADE OF SMP N 3 GADING REJO (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH)

1 20 56

IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH INQUIRY- BASED TEACHING (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH INQUIRY- BASED TEACHING (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH AT THE FOURTH YEAR OF SD NEGERI NGABEAN 3 KART

0 0 15

IMPROVING STUDENTS' READING COMPETENCE THROUGH “ACTIVE”(AN ACTION RESEARCH AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMP 1 AL ISLAM KARTASURA).

0 1 7

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ ENGLISH SKILL THROUGH NUMBERED HEADS TECHNIQUE (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH AT THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMP 8 MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA IN 2009 / 2010 ACADEMIC YEAR).

0 0 8

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH SONGS A Classroom Action Research in The Third Grade Students of SD Negeri Tangkil 1 in the Academic Year 20102011

0 1 96