47
second observation form Table 3.2 was filled after the researcher categorized the meanings of the word take into some groups in the data analysis process.
E. Data Analysis Technique
The  researcher  counted  the  frequency  of  the  occurrences  of  the  data  by applying  a  simple  mathematical  procedure.  A  simple  formula  was  used  for
counting the frequency. The frequency of the occurrences of the word take in the novel in each chapter and the frequency of the occurrences of the word take based
on the levels of polysemy were counted using the formula in Figure 3.1.
Figure 3.1 Formula of Frequency 1
where: fw = frequency of the occurrences
w  = numbers of the word take in each chapterin each level of polysemy ∑w = numbers of the word existed in all chapters of the novel.
The  frequency  of  the  meanings  of  the  word  take  based  on  the  categories was counted using the formula in Figure 3.2
Figure 3.2 Formula of Frequency 2
where: fm = frequency of the meaning
�w = w
∑ �   x
�m = m
∑ �   x
48
m    = numbers of the meaning in each category ∑w = numbers of the word existed in all chapters of the novel.
The  researcher  made  a  coding  name  for  the  data  in  the  analysis  to categorize  the  data.  There  are  two  coding  names  for  the  data.  The  first  coding
name is given to the sentences which contain the word take. The coding name is Context. The first sentence is given a coding name Context 1, the second sentence
is Context 2, and so on {Context 1, Context 2, …, Context n} See Appendix A.
The second coding name is given to the categories of meanings of the word take. The coding name is Series. The first category is given a coding name Series A, the
second  category  is  Series  B,  and  so  on  {Series  A,  Series  B ,…,  Series  n}  See
Appendix D. The researcher interpreted the meaning of the word take in each sentence
based  on  the  contexts  in  the  novel  to  answer  the  first  problem  formulation.  The meanings of the word take in primary level of polysemy were interpreted merely
based on the context without consulting to a dictionary. The meanings of the word take  in  secondary  and  tertiary  levels  of  polysemy  were  interpreted  with
dictionaries  assistance.  The  researcher  used  the Oxford  Advanced  Learner’s
Dictionary  OALD  Oxford,  2010  to  check  the  interpretation  of  the  phrasal verbs. The purpose of this checking was to decide whether the phrasal verbs were
in secondary or tertiary levels of polysemy.  The dictionaries used to look up the meanings  of  the  words  take  as  idioms  were  the  Longman  Dictionary  of  English
Idioms  Long,  1979  and  The  Wordsworth  Dictionary  of  Idioms  Kirkpatrick
49
Schwarz,  1993.  Each  sentence  was  given  the  first  coding  name  Context  1, Context 2, and so on.
In order to check and enhance the validity of the interpretation, especially the meanings interpretation of the word take in primary level of polysemy which
merely  based  on  the  context,  the  researcher  conducted  peer  debriefing.  In qualitative  research,  there  are  some  procedures  or  techniques  to  check  the
credibility  of  the  research  and  peer  debriefing  is  one  of  those  techniques.  Peer debriefing is conducted “to aid in probing the researcher’s thinking around all or
parts of the research process…, which includes, but not limited to, methodology, interpretation,  and  analysis  of  data”  Nguyen,  2008,  p.  604  which  is  done  by
calling  upon  a  peer  who  is  not  interested  or  involved  in  the  research.  Peer debriefing  can  keep  a  researcher’s  bias  out  of  the  research.  Moreover,  peer
debriefing “can help the researcher to obtain trustworthy findings by ensuring that
the findings are confirmable by the peer debriefer” Leech  Onwuegbuzie, 2008, p.  200.  In  conducting  peer  debriefing,  the  researcher  called  upon  ten  peer
debriefers. The peers were ten eighth semester students of the English Language Education Study Program Sanata Dharma University. They were asked to peer the
meaning interpretations of the word take. In finding the relatedness of the meanings of the word take to answer the
second problem formulation, the researcher categorized the meanings into groups where  the  meanings  had  loosely  related  meanings.  Each  of  the  group  was  given
the  second  coding  name  Series  A,  Series  B,  and  so  on.  Then,  the  researcher
50
classified  the  groups  of  meaning  category  using  semantic  roles  theory  to  find closer relations of the meanings of the word take.
The last analysis to answer the third problem formulation was comparing the  meanings  of  the  word  take  from  the  analysis  with  the  meanings  in  the
dictionary  OED.  The  researcher  analyzed  how  the  meanings  from  the  analysis were listed in the dictionary.
F. Research Procedure