4.1.4 Post-test of CLL Method
A post-test was given after all treatments of CLL had been already done. The post-test was given in class VIII A on April 10
th
2011. The test items were not different with the pre-test.
4.2 Description of overall Result
As discussed in chapter III, after conducting the pre-test and post-test, I scored the students‟ performance to know their speaking ability. After I got all of
the scores, I calculated the mean of the pre-test and a post-test of CLL method. The mean of the pre-test score of experimental group was 66.11. Whereas,
the mean of the experimental group which used CLL method was 71.05. So, the mean of pre test was lower than mean of post test and it means that there is an
improvement of test result after conducting the experimental research.
4.2.1 Result of pre test
I described the average score of the pre-test in every aspect of speaking in the results of my research. Those aspects were vocabulary, grammar,
comprehension, fluency, task, and pronunciation that influenced each other. The results could be seen on the following table:
Table 4.2 Students’ scores of Pre-test
Code Grammar
Vocabulary Fluency
Pronunciation Task
Comprehension Score
score
R-1 2,5
3 2
2 2,5
3 15
64 R-2
2 2,5
2 2,5
2,5 2,5
14 60
R-3 2
2,5 2
2 2,5
3 14
60 R-4
3 3
2,5 2,5
3 3
17 72
R-5 2
2,5 2
2 3
3 14,5
62 R-6
2,5 2,5
2,5 2
2,5 3
15 64
R-7 2
2,5 2
2 2,5
3 14
60 R-8
2,5 2,5
2 2,5
2,5 2,5
14,5 62
R-9 2,5
3 2
2,5 2,5
3 15,5
66 R-10
2,5 2
2 2,5
2,5 3
14,5 62
R-11 2
2,5 2
2,5 2,5
3 14,5
62 R-12
3 3
2 2,5
3 3
16,5 70
R-13 2,5
2,5 2
2,5 3
3 15,5
66 R-14
3 3
2,5 2,5
3 3
17 72
R-15 2
2,5 2,5
2,5 3
2,5 15
64 R-16
2,5 3
2,5 2,5
2,5 2,5
15,5 66
R-17 2,5
3 2,5
2,5 2,5
3 16
68 R-18
2,5 2,5
2,5 2,5
2,5 3
15,5 66
R-19 2,5
2,5 2,5
2,5 2,5
2,5 15
64 R-20
3 3,5
2,5 3
3 3
18 76
R-21 3
3 2,5
3 3
3 17,5
74 R-22
3 3
2,5 3
3 3
17,5 74
R-23 2
2 2
2,5 2,5
3 14
60 R-24
3 3
2,5 2,5
3 3
17 72
R-25 2,5
2,5 2
2,5 3
2,5 15
64 R-26
2 2,5
2 2
2,5 3
14 60
R-27 3
3 2,5
3 3
3 17,5
74 R-28
2,5 2,5
2,5 2,5
2,5 2,5
15 64
R-29 2,5
2,5 2,5
2,5 2,5
2,5 15
64 R-30
3 3
2,5 2,5
3 3
17 72
R-31 3
3 2,5
3 3
3 17,5
74 R-32
2 2,5
2 2,5
2,5 3
14,5 62
R-33 3
2,5 2
2,5 2,5
3 15,5
66 R-34
3 3
2,5 2,5
3 3
17 72
R-35 2,5
2,5 2
2 2,5
3 14,5
62 R-36
2 2,5
2 2,5
2,5 2,5
14 60
R-37 2,5
2,5 2,5
2,5 3
3 16
68 R-38
2,5 2,5
2 2,5
2,5 3
15 64
∑ 95
102 85.5
94 103
109.5 1976
2512 M
2.5 2.68
2.25 2.47
2.71 2.88
52 66.11
From the calculation, it showed that the mean of grammar was 2.5, vocabulary was 2.68, fluency was 2.25, pronunciation was 2.47, task was 2.71,
and comprehension was 2.88. Therefore, the mean of the pre-test was 66.11.
4.2.2 Result of Post-test using CLL Method Here, I also described the result of the post-test using CLL method after
describing the result of the pre-test. The result was described in six aspects like in the pre-test result.
Table 4.3 Students’ scores of Post test CLL method
Code Grammar
Vocabulary Fluency
Pronunciation Task
Comprehension Score
score
R-1 2,5
3 2
2 3
3 15,5
66 R-2
2,5 2,5
2 2,5
2,5 2,5
14,5 62
R-3 2,5
3 2,5
2,5 2,5
3 16
68 R-4
3 3
3 3
3 3
18 76
R-5 3
3 2,5
2,5 3
2,5 16,5
70 R-6
2,5 3
2,5 2,5
3 3
16,5 70
R-7 3
3 3
3 3
3 18
76 R-8
2,5 2,5
2 2,5
3 2,5
15 64
R-9 3
3 2
3 3
3 17
72 R-10
3 3
2,5 2,5
2,5 3
16,5 70
R-11 2,5
3 2
2 3
3 15,5
66 R-12
3 3
3 3
3 3
18 76
R-13 3
3 2
2,5 2,5
3 16
68 R-14
3 3,5
3 3
3 3
18,5 78
R-15 3
3 2,5
2,5 3
3 17
72 R-16
3 3,5
2,5 2,5
3 2,5
17 72
R-17 3
3 3
3 3
3 18
76 R-18
3 3
2,5 3
3 3
17,5 74
R-19 2,5
3 2,5
2,5 3
3 16,5
70 R-20
3 3
2,5 3
3 2,5
17 72
R-21 3
3 3
3 3
2,5 17,5
74 R-22
3 3
2,5 3
3 3
17,5 74
R-23 2,5
3 2
2,5 2,5
3 15,5
66 R-24
3 3,5
3 3
3 3
18,5 78
R-25 3
3 2,5
2,5 3
3 17
72 R-26
2,5 2,5
2 2
3 3
15 64
R-27 3
3 3
3 3
3 18
76 R-28
3 3
2,5 2,5
3 3
17 72
R-29 3
3 2,5
2,5 3
2,5 16,5
70 R-30
3 3
2,5 3
3 3
17,5 74
R-31 3
3,5 2,5
3 3
3 18
76 R-32
3 3
2 2,5
3 3
16,5 70
R-33 3
3 2,5
2,5 2,5
3 16,5
70 R-34
3 3
2,5 3
3 3
17,5 74
R-35 2,5
3 2,5
2,5 3
3 16,5
70 R-36
2,5 2,5
2 2,5
2,5 3
15 64
R-37 2,5
3 2,5
2,5 3
3 16,5
70 R-38
2,5 3
2 2,5
3 3
16 68
∑ 107.5
112 93.5
101 110.5
110.5 637
2700 M
2.83 2.95
2.46 2.66
2.91 2.91
16.76 71.05
From the data on the table, it could be seen that the mean of grammar was 2.83, vocabulary was 2.95, fluency was 2.46, pronunciation was 2.66, task was
2.91, and comprehension was 2.91. Therefore, the mean of the post-test CLL method was 71.05.
Table 4.4 The Average Scores of Pre-Test and Post-Test of CLL
Experimental Group using CLL method Average Score of Pre Test
66.11
Average Score of Post-Test
71.05
The Difference between Pre Test and Post Test
4.94
Based on the table above, it could be seen the difference of the average score between the pre-test and post-test of experimental group after using CLL
method was 4.94. It shows that there is an improvement of test result after getting some treatments using CLL method.
Besides comparing the average score, I also compared the average scores of each aspect in speaking skill scoring. I found that the difference score in each
aspect of post test after treatment using CLL method was better than score of pre test before receiving treatment. The difference was shown on the table as follows:
Table 4.5 The Result of Pre-Test and Post-Test Average Scores of Each Speaking Aspect
Speaking Aspect
Experimental Group The Average Score of
Pre-Test The Average Score
of Post-Test
Grammar CLL method
2.5 2.83
Vocabulary CLL method
2.68 2.95
Fluency CLL method
2.25 2.46
Pronunciation CLL method
2.47 2.66
Task CLL method
2.71 2.91
Comprehension CLL method
2.88 2.91
4.3 Difference between Two Means
Kategori