commit to user
Table 4.8. The Enrichment of Spelling Aspect Cycle I
Spelling Aspect Pre Test
Post Test I
Sum of the Score 170
260 Sum of the Students
42 42
Students’ Mean Score 4.04
6.19 The students’ mean score enriched from 4.04 in the pre test to 6.19 in the
post test I. In the first cycle, the students did the spelling activities by doing themselves. For example they should be able to spell “L-O-C-K, S-H-O-W-E-R,
S-H-O-P-P-I-N-G” better. The third enrichment was the pronunciation aspect. The enrichment of
pronunciation aspect can be seen from the score of pre test and post test I below: Table 4.9. The Enrichment of Pronunciation Aspect Cycle I
Pronunciation Aspect Pre Test
Post Test I
Sum of the Score 1348
1586 Sum of the Students
42 42
Students’ Mean Score 32.09
37.76 The students’ mean score enriched from 32.09 in the pre test to 37.76 in
the post test I. The students’ pronunciation can be seen from the activities when the students were asked by the teacher to pronunce the sentences based on the
YouTube videos correctly.
e. Reflecting and Evaluating the Result
Based on the result of observation, score of the test and observer’s diary, the researcher found several positive results and some weaknesses in the first
cycle. They were as follows: 1 Positive Results
a. There was an enrichment of students’ attention in learning. There were changes from students’ behavior in teaching and learning process. It can be
commit to user
seen from students’ atittute during the lesson. They paid more attention to the researcher’s explanation.
b. There were enrichment of students’ achievement as. It was shown from the result of the post test I. The students’ mean score of meaning aspect
enriched from 5.47 in the pre test to 7.61 in post test I. The students’ mean score of spelling aspect enriched from 4.04 in the pre test to 6.19 in the post
test I. The students’ mean score of pronunciation aspect enriched from 32.09 in the pre test to 37.76 in the post test I. The mean score for post test I was
56.17. It was higher than the mean score of the pre test was 42,64. 2 Weaknesses
a. Although the students were more enthusiastic but there were some students who were still passive in the classroom. Two students, Adi and Wulandari
still got low score, Tita seemed still get difficulty to pronounce the sentence. Some of them who sat in the back also did not a part in discussing.
b. The boys in the corner, they were Iqbal, Hendrawan, Bryan, Gandung, Mufid, Wildan, tended make noise when the task given. They disturbed
other students and made the class crowded. c. Generally, the researcher found the students’ enrichment in vocabulary when
they study using YouTube videos, but the students’ ability in pronouncing and spelling were still poor.
d. The average score of post-test in cycle 1 was still under the English passing grade, that was 60.00 and it was 56.17.
From the result of the first cycle above, it could be seen that there were still some weaknesses. So, the researcher thought that it was necessary to make
the next planning and to conduct the next cycle. It was in order to solve the problems that appeared in cycle one and to overcome those weaknesses.
f. Revising the Plan
