Checking Validity of Findings
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
kind of strategies on Schmitt’s taxonomy will be given a code in order to make the data analysis easier to understand, for instance: strategy number one on questionnaire
which is categorized as memory strategies is given code Me01. Therefore, the following explanation on research findings would be used that code to represent each
strategies. The next step after categorizing each items of questionnaire into Schmitt’s
taxonomy, researcher calculated the data in order to find the percentage of respondents who consider each strategies as useful strategies see chapter III for the
formula. In addition, researcher also calculated mean of each strategies. The mean represents average of total scores from each strategies. The formula of mean is below:
= ∑
ℎ � � �
Then, mean of each strategies are categorized into four scales, which are: very good, good, poor, and very poor see app. 1 for specific description of each scales.
In order to categorize the mean into those four scale, researcher calculated the interval scores for each scales. The formula to find the interval is:
� =
� = ℎ� ℎ
� − �
4 =
4 − 4 = ,7
Therefore, the interval of each scale is 0,75. Specifically,
the interval scores for categorizing the mean are presented below:
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
Table 4.2
The Score Description of Vocabulary Learning Strategies
Table 4.2 shows four scales that reflect classification of vocabulary learning strategies that student teachers consider to their students. The highest score of mean
is 4 and the lowest mean is 1. High score indicates the more agreement towards the usefulness of the strategy for their students and the lowest score indicates
disagreement. The explanation of each categories is described below: