Checking Validity of Findings

digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id kind of strategies on Schmitt’s taxonomy will be given a code in order to make the data analysis easier to understand, for instance: strategy number one on questionnaire which is categorized as memory strategies is given code Me01. Therefore, the following explanation on research findings would be used that code to represent each strategies. The next step after categorizing each items of questionnaire into Schmitt’s taxonomy, researcher calculated the data in order to find the percentage of respondents who consider each strategies as useful strategies see chapter III for the formula. In addition, researcher also calculated mean of each strategies. The mean represents average of total scores from each strategies. The formula of mean is below: = ∑ ℎ � � � Then, mean of each strategies are categorized into four scales, which are: very good, good, poor, and very poor see app. 1 for specific description of each scales. In order to categorize the mean into those four scale, researcher calculated the interval scores for each scales. The formula to find the interval is: � = � = ℎ� ℎ � − � 4 = 4 − 4 = ,7 Therefore, the interval of each scale is 0,75. Specifically, the interval scores for categorizing the mean are presented below: digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id Table 4.2 The Score Description of Vocabulary Learning Strategies Table 4.2 shows four scales that reflect classification of vocabulary learning strategies that student teachers consider to their students. The highest score of mean is 4 and the lowest mean is 1. High score indicates the more agreement towards the usefulness of the strategy for their students and the lowest score indicates disagreement. The explanation of each categories is described below:

a. Very Good Vocabulary Learning Strategies

After calculating mean and categorized it into the scales above, researcher tabulated the data. Firstly, vocabulary strategies with the highest mean and it is classified as very good strategy. Very good strategy means that that vocabulary learning strategy is very useful and su itable for student teachers’ students. Strategy on this category has mean between 3,26 – 4. Therefore, vocabulary learning strategies on this category has the highest mean among others 30 categories. The following table is data tabulation of very good strategy. VG on the table below means very good. Interval score Scale Scale Description 3,26 – 4 4 Very good VG 2,51 – 3,25 3 Good G 1,76 – 2,50 2 Poor P 1 – 1,75 1 Very Poor VP digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id Table 4.3 Data Tabulation of Very Good Vocabulary Learning Strategies No Code of Strategies Strategy Percentage of Respondent Mean Scale Description 1 Me01 To study a word with a picture of its meaning instead of definition to remember it. 98,41 3,35 VG Table 4.3 shows that there is only one vocabulary learning strategy which is consider as very good strategy. That strategy is studying a word with a picture. This strategy is categorized as memory strategy. 98,41 student teachers agree that using picture to learn word is very useful strategy to be used for their students and they definitely consider that strategy to be used in class. Therefore, almost all respondents agree that this strategy is very useful strategy.

b. Good Vocabulary Learning Strategies

Secondly, vocabulary learning strategies which are consider as good strategies. This kind of strategies has mean below 3,26. There are 25 vocabulary learning strategies which are considered as good strategies. In the other words, student teachers agreed that those 25 strategies are useful and suitable for their students hence student teachers consider those strategies to be used in class. Thus, almost all of presented vocabulary learning strategies are good strategies. The following table presents kinds of vocabulary learning strategies that is consider as good strategies. G on the scale description indicates good strategies.

Dokumen yang terkait

Logical statement in student’s research proposal at English Teacher Education Department Islamic State University Sunan Ampel Surabaya.

0 1 63

The effectiveness of critical reading strategies on students’ critical thinking ability at English teacher education Department of State Islamic University of Sunan Ampel.

0 2 77

English reading habit of student teachers at english teacher education department of Sunan Ampel State Islamic University: level and common factor analysis.

0 1 75

The languange attitude of English Education Department students in Sunan Ampel Islamic State University in learning english.

1 4 93

Conversational hand gestures of student teachers to give instruction in microteaching class of English Teacher Education Department at Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya.

0 1 120

CULTURAL CONTENT IN SPEAKING FOR EVERYDAY COMMUNICATION CLASS IN ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA.

0 0 110

APOLOGIZING STRATEGIES USED BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS OF STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA.

0 0 94

LEARNING STRATEGIES AND PROFICIENCY LEVEL IN ESSAY WRITING AT ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT UIN SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA.

0 1 69

STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY AT ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF THE STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA.

0 1 85

CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ LEARNING STYLE AND ACHIEVEMENT IN CRITICAL READING CLASS OF ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT AT SUNAN AMPEL STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY SURABAYA.

0 0 78