Question numbers 1-4 wer e about the content of the students’ recount text.
They were about who, when, where and what happened in the story they made. Question number 5 was about the structure of recount text. They had to give check
list if their recount text had structure mentioned in the table. Question number 6 was about the language feature of recount text. There was some language features
mentioned in the table. What the students had to do was to write every language feature they had in their recount text in the given table. The last question was
question number 7, in this part they were required to find mistakes and error they made in making recount text.
See Appendix 6 to see the students’ worksheet. The objective of analyzing and revising student’s recount text was to help
students find out the weakness and strengths in the recount text they made. Therefore, they could revise and improve their text.
4.4.3 The Analysis of the Students’ Third Activity
This activity was the same with second and forth activity in the first cycle. The students were given structural assignment to read some examples of recount text. The
purpose of this activity was to make student understand more about language feature and generic structure of recount text. Figure 18 shows the example of recount text as
the 9
th
material:
Figure 4.9 The 9
th
Material in the Moodle 4.4.4 The Analysis of the
Students’ Fourth Activity and Post Test.
This activity was conducted on May 13, 2011. As usual, they were login to their Moodle account first. In this activity, the students were required to revise recount text
they made based on analyze and revise worksheet they did last week. Firstly they downloaded analyzing and revising worksheet. Through the analyzing and revising
worksheet, the student knew the error and mistakes they made in writing recount text as well as the weakness and strength of their recount text.
After getting both forms, they had to improve their recount text. The students were given 45 minutes to finish their writing. The teacher gave some roles in writing
the text. The text should be written in Time New Roman and the font size was 12. The entire student did the task seriously. They were able to finish this task not more
than 30 minutes. The last task was uploading the text in the Moodle. They all knew
how the way to upload the file. All of them were able to upload the task. See Appendix 7
to see the students’ recount text. The result of the students’ recount text can be seen in the table below:
No Students’ Code
Component of Writing Scoring
Score 1
2 3
4 1
A-01 24
20 20
17 81
2 A-02
24 22
22 18
86 3
A-03 22
20 21
17 80
4 A-04
21 19
20 16
76 5
A-05 18
18 19
16 71
6 A-06
25 21
22 16
84 7
A-07 28
22 24
18 92
8 A-08
23 19
20 17
79 9
A-09 20
20 20
18 78
10 A-10
26 20
20 18
84 11
A-11 24
21 20
17 82
12 A-12
26 22
21 16
85 13
A-13 20
18 20
17 75
14 A-14
28 22
22 18
90 15
A-15 20
18 18
16 72
16 A-16
25 20
23 18
86 17
A-17 19
16 18
15 68
18 A-18
27 23
22 18
90 19
A-19 22
19 19
18 78
20 A-20
22 20
20 16
78 21
464 400
411 340
1615 Score Average
23.2 20
20.55 17
80.75
Table 4.3 The Result of the Students’Achievement in Cycle 2
1= Taskcontain appropriateness to what extent the writing reaches the target 2= Rhetoric’s step appropriateness to what extent the writing order takes the
reader into recount
3= Suitable form how far the writing fulfill form arrangement, spelling, neat 4= Language appropriateness how far the language which use appropriate
with communication context? The average score of pre-test =
ΣStudents’ Score X 100 Σ Students
= 1615 X 100 Σ 20
= 80.75 The result of the post-test was better than the result of the pre-test and the
cycle 1 test. The average of the post test was 80.75. It increased 3.65 from the cycle 1 test. It can be concl
uded that the students’ achievement in writing recount text by using Moodle had significant improvement.
4.5 The Analysis of Questionnaire
