Population and Sample Research Instrument

28 Grammar 1. Grammar almost entirely inaccurate except in stock phrases. 2. Constant errors showing control of very few major patterns and frequently preventing communication. 3. Frequent errors showing some major patterns uncontrolled and causing occasional irritation and misunderstanding. 4. Occasional errors showing imperfect control of some patterns but no weakness that causes misunderstanding. 5. Few errors, with no patterns of failure. 6. No more than two errors during the interview. Vocabulary 1. Vocabulary inadequate for even the simplest conversation. 2. Vocabulary limited to basic personal and survival areas time, food, transportation, etc. 3. Choice of words sometimes inaccurate, limitations of vocabulary prevent discussion of some common professional and social topics. 4. Professional vocabulary adequate to discuss special interest; general vocabulary permits discussion of any non-technical subject with some circumlocutions. 5. Professional vocabulary broad and precise; general vocabulary adequate to cope with complex practical problems and varied social situations. 6. Vocabulary apparently as accurate and extensive as that of an educated native speaker. Fluency 1. Speech is so halting and fragmentary that conversation is virtually impossible. 2. Speech is very slow and uneven except for short or routine sentences. 3. Speech is frequently hesitant and jerky; sentences may be left uncompleted. 29 4. Speech is occasionally hesitant, with some unevenness caused by rephrasing and groping for words. 5. Speech is effortless and smooth, but perceptively non-native in speed and evenness. 6. Speech on all professional and general topics as effortless and smooth as a native speaker ‟ s. Comprehension 1. Understands too little for the simplest type of conversation. 2. Understands only slow, very simple speech on common social and touristic topics; requires constant repetition and rephrasing. 3. Understands careful, somewhat simplified speech when engaged in a dialogue, but may require considerable repetition and rephrasing. 4. Understands quite well normal educated speech when engaged in dialogue, but requires occasional repetition or rephrasing. 5. Understands everything in normal educated conversation except for very colloquial or low-frequency items, or exceptionally rapid or slurred speech. 6. Understands everything in both formal and colloquial speech to be expected of an educated native speaker.

E. Data Analysis Technique

The formula used in this research is for uncorrelated data. This formula is usually used in a condition of which a group score is not depend on other group ‟ s score. In this research, the writer only wanted to see and differ the results of test on a single treatment. The formula can be seen below 4 : 4 Anas Sudijono, Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1987, p. 347. 30 Where: M 1 = The mean of group 1 experimental class = The mean of group 2 controlled class = The standard error of group 1 experimental class = The standard error of group 2 controlled class Afterwards, the calculation goes to several processes as follows: 1. Determining Mean of Variable X 2. Determining Mean of Variable Y ∑ ∑ 3. Determining Standard of Deviation Score of Variable X √∑ ∑ 4. Determining Standard of Deviation Score of Variable Y √∑ ∑ 5. Determining Standard Error of Mean of Variable X √ 6. Determining Standard Error of Mean of Variable Y √ 7. Determining Standard Error of Difference of Mean of Variable X and Y √ 8. Determining t o 31 9. Determining t table in significance level 5, with df degrees of freedom 5

F. Statistical Hypothesis

H : μ 1 = μ 2 H a : μ1 ≠ μ 2 And then, the criteria will used as follows: 1. If t observed t t table t t in significant rank of 0.05, H null hypothesis is rejected; as reversed Ha is accepted. It means that the rates of mean score of the experimental group are higher than the controlled group. 2. If t observed t t table t t in significant rank of 0.05, H null hypothesis is accepted, as reversed Ha is rejected. It means that the rates of the means score of the experimental group are lower than the controlled group. 5 Ibid., pp. 347─8.

CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDINGS AND

DATA INTERPRETATION

A. Research Findings

1. Data Description a. Pre-test and Post-test of Experimental Class Table 4.1 The Experimental Class Test Result 32 NO SCORE GAIN SCORE PRE-TEST POST-TEST 1 63 70 7 2 60 70 10 3 42 72 30 4 58 70 12 5 44 58 14 6 58 72 14 7 52 68 16 8 61 70 9 9 67 70 3 10 44 64 20 11 52 72 20 12 29 52 23 13 52 70 18 14 52 72 20 15 61 74 13 16 67 74 7 17 19 64 45 18 63 74 11