The Pre-Test Score and The Post Test Score of Experimental Class

The normality of pre-test above used lilliefors Test. The researcher assumed that: H : the data was in normal distribution, H a : the data was not in normal distribution The criteria were H accepted if T count 0.301 and rejected if T count 0.301 with the significance degree was 5 Table 4.3 showed that the result of the T count experimental class gained 0.01 which was smaller than T tabel, T count T tabel = 0.01 0.30. Moreover, the T count of the controlled class gained 0.01, or T count T tabel = 0.01 0.30. Both of the data pointed out the score that smaller than T tabel. So, it meant that both of classes were in normal distribution.

b. Normality Test of Post-Test

The normality of post-test used to know whether the data was in normal distribution or not. To know the distribution of the data, the researcher used lilliefors as the medium of calculating the data. Here the result: Table 4.4 The Result of Normality of Post-test No. Source Experimental Controlled 1. N 19 19 2. Mean 68.11 69.58 3. Variance 125.87 73.25 4. Standard Deviation 11.22 8.55 5. Minimal Score 46 54 6. Maximal Score 93 95 7. T count 0.20 0.19 8. T table 0.30 9. Conclusion Normal Distribution The normality of post-test above used lilliefors Test. The researcher assumed that: H : the data was in normal distribution, H a : the data was not in normal distribution The criteria were H accepted if T count 0.301 and rejected if T count 0.301 with the significance degree was 5 Based on the table 4.4, the result showed that the T count of experimental class reached 0.20 and the controlled class reached 0.19. Moreover, both of the results of Tcount were smaller than T tabel, T count T tabel , 0.20 0.30 and 0.19 0.30. It calculated with the degree of significance 0.05. It meant Null Hypothesis H was accepted that indicated both of the data were in normal distribution.

2. Homogeneity Test a. Homogeneity Test of Pre-Test

The homogeneity test was used to know whether the group sample of the population was homogeneous or not. It was calculated based on the formula below: Variance of Pre-Test of experimental Class: S X n S 90499 19 1293 19 = 4763.10 – 4631.16 = 139.27 Variance of Pre-Test of Controlled class: S y n S 99636 19 1364 19 = 5244 – 5153.72 = 95.28 Homogeneity Test of Pre-Test F

Dokumen yang terkait

Students' Readability of English Textbooks (A Mix-Method Study of the Tenth Grade Students at Five Vocational Schools in Majalengka West Java)

0 5 182

The Effectiveness of Using Storyboard Technique on Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text (A Quasi-experimental Study at the Tenth Grade of MAN 1 Tangerang Selatan)

3 41 145

The Effectiveness of pictures towards Students' Writing Skill of Descriptive Text ( A Quasi-experimental Study at Tenth Grade of SMK Islamiyah Ciputat)

0 13 86

The Effect of Reciprocal Technique towards Students' Reading Comprehension on Report Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study of Eleventh Grade Students of SMAN 3 South Tangerang

0 34 132

An Analysis of Students' Error in Writing Recount Text (A Case Study in the Second Grade Students of SMP Trimulia Jakarta))

16 39 151

Grammatical Errors on Students' Writing of Recount Text (An Error Analysis at the Second Grade Students of SMP Dharma Karya UT Pamulang)

1 11 80

The Effect of Using Drama Technique on Students’ Speaking Ability (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Seventh Grade Students of SMPN 6 South Tangerang).

0 9 0

The Relationship between Students' Creative Thinking Ability and Their Writing Recount Text Skill (A Corelational Study at the Eleventh Grade students of MA Khasanah Kebajikan Tangerang Selatan Academic Year 2015/2016)

0 10 0

The Effectiveness of Using Clustering Technique in Teaching Writing Recount Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Second Grade ofMts Negeri 3 Jakarta)

1 11 109

The Effect of Peer-Assessment Method towards Students' Writing of Recount Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Tenth Grade Students of SMA Negeri 11 Tangerang Selatan year 2015/2016)

0 3 72