Homogeneity Test Technique of Data Collection

No. Students’ Code Pre-test Score Post-test Score Gain Score 11 K 66 75 9 12 L 57 53 -4 13 M 91 93 2 14 N 66 64 -2 15 O 75 74 -1 16 P 72 66 -6 17 Q 76 82 6 18 R 76 71 -5 19 S 67 60 -7 Total Score 1293 1294 1 Mean Score 68.05 68.10 0.05 Based on the table above, the tests which were given to the experimental class pointed the pre-test mean score of students was 68.05. Moreover, the student’s lowest score in the pre-test was 32 while the highest score was 91. After being treated by peer-assessment, the mean score of the post test was 68.10. The result of the post-test which has the lowest score was 46 and the highest score was 93. The finding pointed out that the mean score of both pre-test and post-test was not quite increasing. It was just about 0.05 of the score gained. On the other hand, the gain score between pre-test and post-test in the experimental class was pointed out that the lowest gain score was -19 and the highest was 32.

2. The Pre-Test Score and The Post Test Score of Controlled Class

The controlled class was administered at X.3 of SMA Negeri 11 Tangerang Selatan which consisted of 39 students but only 19 of the students’ paper of it which were qualified to be evaluated. Here, the result of the students’ test: Table 4.2 The Pre-Test and Post Test of Controlled Class No. Student’s Code Pre- Test Post- Test Score’s Gain 1 A 70 68 -2 2 B 94 95 1 3 C 70 82 12 4 D 61 66 5 5 E 62 63 1 6 F 70 54 -16 7 G 95 63 -32 8 H 71 61 -10 9 I 72 67 -5 10 J 70 70 11 K 69 70 1 12 L 64 70 6 13 M 61 70 9 14 N 61 70 9 15 O 72 74 2 16 P 83 66 -17 17 Q 74 65 -9 18 R 76 74 -2 19 S 69 74 -5 The total Score 1364 1322 -52 Mean Score 71.79 69.57 -2.73 Based on the table above, the total score of the students’ pre-test score was 1364. The result of the students’ mean score in the pre-test was 71.79. While the lowest score of the students was 61 and the highest score was 95. Otherwise, the total score of the post-test score was 1322 which was giving the mean score of the post-test score was 69.57. It has the lowest score of 54 and the highest score of 95. In addition, the lowest students’ gain score in the controlled class was -32 which was taken from the student who got the highest score in the pre-test. On the other hand, the highest students’ gain score achieved 12.

B. Data Analyzing

Data Analyzing consists of normality test of pre-test, normality test of post- test, homogeneity test of pre-test, homogeneity test of post-test and also the t-test of the data.

1. Normality Test a. Normality Test of Pre-Test

The normality of pre-test was used to know the normality data was in normal distribution or not. To gain the result of the normality of distribution data, the research used Lilliefors as the medium. As the Lilliefors theory, the examination of normal distribution come from the proportional accumulation equaled by the function of distribution on the distribution of normal probability. 1 Here is the result of SPSS output: Table 4.3 The Result of Homogeneity of Pre-Test No. Source Experimental Controlled 1. N 19 19 2. Mean 68.05 71.79 3. Variance 139.27 95.28 4. Standard Deviation 11.80 9.761 5. Minimal Score 32 61 6. Maximal Score 91 95 7. T count 0.01 0.01 8. T table 0.30 9. Conclusion Normal Distribution 1 Budi Susetyo, Statistika untuk Analisis Data Penelitian, Bandung: PT Refika Aditama, 2010, p. 148.

Dokumen yang terkait

Students' Readability of English Textbooks (A Mix-Method Study of the Tenth Grade Students at Five Vocational Schools in Majalengka West Java)

0 5 182

The Effectiveness of Using Storyboard Technique on Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text (A Quasi-experimental Study at the Tenth Grade of MAN 1 Tangerang Selatan)

3 41 145

The Effectiveness of pictures towards Students' Writing Skill of Descriptive Text ( A Quasi-experimental Study at Tenth Grade of SMK Islamiyah Ciputat)

0 13 86

The Effect of Reciprocal Technique towards Students' Reading Comprehension on Report Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study of Eleventh Grade Students of SMAN 3 South Tangerang

0 34 132

An Analysis of Students' Error in Writing Recount Text (A Case Study in the Second Grade Students of SMP Trimulia Jakarta))

16 39 151

Grammatical Errors on Students' Writing of Recount Text (An Error Analysis at the Second Grade Students of SMP Dharma Karya UT Pamulang)

1 11 80

The Effect of Using Drama Technique on Students’ Speaking Ability (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Seventh Grade Students of SMPN 6 South Tangerang).

0 9 0

The Relationship between Students' Creative Thinking Ability and Their Writing Recount Text Skill (A Corelational Study at the Eleventh Grade students of MA Khasanah Kebajikan Tangerang Selatan Academic Year 2015/2016)

0 10 0

The Effectiveness of Using Clustering Technique in Teaching Writing Recount Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Second Grade ofMts Negeri 3 Jakarta)

1 11 109

The Effect of Peer-Assessment Method towards Students' Writing of Recount Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Tenth Grade Students of SMA Negeri 11 Tangerang Selatan year 2015/2016)

0 3 72