in some forms of language. For example, the word run “I like to run” means, “Walk fast” and in “They run a mail order house” means, “to manage”.
Although we are supposed not to make words means what they do not mean, we sometimes mean words mean what they do not mean, we sometimes
mean somethimg different from what our word mean linguistically. On the other words, we speak nonliterally. Thus if we are speaking nonliterally, then we will
mean something different from what our words mean. If we are speaking literally, then we mean what our words mean.
2.3 The Goals of Semantics Theory
There are two questions about the goals of Semantics theory. The first question is what should a Semantics theory do and how should it do it? The
answer to the first question is that a Semantics theory should attribute to each expression in the language and the semantic relation it has should define those
relations. Thus, if an expression is synonymous or entails the other, the semantic
theory should make those semantic relations. The second question is that a semantic theory should have at least two kinds of constrains:
1. A Semantics theory should attribute to each expression in the language
the semantic properties and relations. 2.
A Semantics theory should define those proprties and relations, i.e. at least two kinds of constrains:
Universitas Sumatera Utara
a. A Semantics theory of natural language should be finite. People are
capable of storing only a finite amount of information but they learn the semantics of natural language.
b. A Semantics theory of natural language should reflect the facts
except for idioms expressions are compositional. This means that meaning of syntactically complex expression is determined by the
meaning of its constituents and their grammatical relations.
2.4 Meaning Relations in English
Meaning relations is also called sense or semantics relations. It is the realtionships of meaning or sense that may be set up between two individual and
groups of lexical items. Semantic or meaning relations have six terms that will be discussed in this thesis. They are synonymy, antonymy, polysemy, homonymy,
hyponymy, and meronymy.
2.4.1 Synonymy
The term synonymy is derived from Greek word synonymy syn which means with together and onyma means name. So, synonymy means name
together. Two words or more together name the same object, action, event or quality.
Synonymy are words from the same language and grammatical category, which have similar or almost similar meaning but different spelling, sound,
connotation, or application. It is identical in sense to another word or has the same
Universitas Sumatera Utara
or nearly the same general sense as another word but it is perhaps use in different context. Examples of synonyms are the pairs:
1. kingly = royal
2. world = universe
3. buy = purchase
4. brotherly = fraternal
5. almost = nearly
Nevertheless, it has been aid as well to remember that no two words ever have exactly the same meaning no perfect synonym. Two words might be
synoymous in one sentence but different in another. It seems to be very little if any differences between the expressions. Both of the following expressions have
difference to be considered. For examples: a.
Marry is sitting in the sofa b.
Marry is sitting in the couch
Some individuals may always use sofa and couch, but if they know the
two words, they will understand the sentences with either word and interpret them to mean the same thing. The degree of semantic similarity between words depends
on great extent on the number of semantic properties they share. Sofa and couch
refer to the same type of object and share most, if not all, their semantic properties.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
2.4.2 Antonymy
Antonymy are words or expressions which are opposite in meaning. Or two forms with opposite meaning. They can share an aspect of meaning but
opposite or incompatible in some other aspect of meaning. There are three kinds of antonyms, they are:
1. Complementary Pairs
It means the items complementary to each other. The items belong to the set of incompatible terms. We can also say that the negative of one word is
synonymous with the other. For example: male X female and clean X dirty are complementary pairs. If not male = female and if not female = male and also if
not clean = dirty, if not dirty = clean.
Complementary pairs are predicates which come in pairs and between them exhaust all the relevant possibilities. If the one predicates is applicable, then
the other can not be and vice versa. For instance, the words married and single.
These two words cannot be used to refer the same individual at the same time.
There is only one possibility of the fact, such as in the sentence Peter is married or Peter is single. If married is application, then single is not, and vise versa. It
means, to say Peter is married is to say that He is not single. So, to say something is Not the one is to say that is the other.
2. Gradable Pairs
It means the pairs of words have gradation of width, age, size, etc. All are
indicated by the adjectives. For examples: old X new and hard X soft are gradable pairs. If we say not old, it is not necessarily equal with new because when
Universitas Sumatera Utara
someone is not old, it doesn’t mean he is new. Gradable pairs also means the
negative of one word is not synonymous with the other. Gradable pairs can be graded into comparative and superlative degrees by
adding the word more or most and inflection -er or –es to which are being compared. For example, the word big is the opposite of word small. The word big
can be graded into comparative degree bigger or superlative degree biggest, and the word small can be garded into comparative degree smaller or superlative
degree smallest. It is also true of gradable pairs that more of one is less of another. For example: longer is less short, , wider is less narrow, and more bigness is less
smaller. There are two characteristics of gradable pairs, they are marked term and
unmarked term. Marked term means that the term is not so used by the speaker.
In contrary, unmarked term means that the term of the pairs is commonly used by
people in speaking of their language. For example, the expression How high is it? or How wide is it? are commonly used than How low is it? or How narrow is it?.
3. Relational Opposite
Relational opposites is a quite different kind of ‘opposite’ found with pairs of words which exhibit the reversal of relationship between items Palmer,
1976:81.
It means we can find the relationship between the opposite pairs of words or two-way contrast where one number presupposes the other, symetry,
transitivity, and reflexivity are the characteristics of relation.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Relational opposite comes from verbs: buysell, lendborrow, rentlet, ownbelong to, and
giverecieve. There are also nouns: husbandwife, fiancefiancee, parentchild, debtorcreditor, and
teacherpupi; in a number of terms referring to spatial position: abovebelow, infront ofbehind, north ofsouth
of; and in grammar too, active and passive such as: if Tom hits Harry, Harry is hit by Tom.
It is clear that if A gives Y to B, then B receives Y from A ; if A is B’s
teacher, then B is A’s pupil. Pairs of words ending in –er and –ee are usually relational opposite. For instance, if Ann is Bob’s emlpoyer, then Bob is Ann’s
employee. Other forms to form antonyms are by adding the prefix un-, prefix non-, prefix in- before the word. For examples:
equal X unequal important X unimportant
fiction X nonfiction stop X nonstop
direct X indirect capable X incapable
2.4.3 Polysemy The term Polysemy is derived from Greek word poly means many and
sema means sign or mark. So, the sameness of meaning is not very easy to deal
with but there seems nothing inherently difficult about the difference of meaning. Not only do different words have different meanings; it is also the case that the
same word may have a set of different meanings. This is polysemy; such a word is
Universitas Sumatera Utara
polysemic. Thus the dictionary will define the word flight in at least the following ways: passing through the air, power of flying, air journey, and unit of the Air
Force. Yet there are problems even with this apparently simple concept. And other example the noun head, for instance, seems to have related meaning when
speak of the head of a person, the head of a company, head of a table of bad, and head of lettuce or cabbage. If we take the anatomical reference as the basic
one, either reflecting the general shape of the human head or, more abstractly, the relation of the head to the rest of the body.
First, we cannot clearly distinguish whether two meanings ate the same or different and therefore, determine exactly how many meanings a word has. For a
meaning is not easily delimited and so distinguished from other meanings.
Consider the verb eat. The dictionary distinguishes the ‘literal’ sense of taking
food and derived meanings of ‘use up’ and ‘corrode’ and we should, perhaps treat these as three different meanings. But we can also distinguish between eating
meat and eating soup, the former with a knife and fork and the letter with a spoon. Morever, we talk about dringking soup as well as eating it.
Secondly, we may ask whether we can make any general remarks about differences of meaning. Are regular types of difference found in the meaning of
various words? One of the most familiar kinds of relationship between meanings. Thirdly, there is the problem that if one form has several meanings, it is
not always clear whether we shall say that this is an examples of polysemy that there is one word with several meanings or of Homonymy that there are several
words with the same shape.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
According to Palmer 1976:68 ” The problem, however, is to decide when we have polysemy and when we have homonymy. Given that we have a written
form with two meanings, do are we say that it is one word with different meaning polysemy or two different words with the same shapes of homonymy”.
2.4.4 Homonymy
Homonymy is relation between two or more ethic expressions that have the same form but different meaning. Complete homonyms have the same
pronounciation and the same spelling. In other word, homonyms are words which are spelled and pronounced alike, but differing in meaning.
Homonym can be subdivided into homophone and homograph. Homophone is word that have the same pronounciation but different in spelling
and meaning. For examples: - Flour fla
υər means used for making bread or cake - Flower fla
υər means the part of plant - Raise reiz means raise one’s hand
- Raze reiz means destroy a building - Tale tail means story
- Tail tail means one part of the animal body While homograph is word which have the same spelling but different in
pronouncing and meaning. For examples: - Lead led means metal
- Lead li:d means dog’s lead - Live liv means to be alive or remain a live
Universitas Sumatera Utara
- Live laiv means having life Another examples:
He is a pupil
Westerner’s pupil is blue
Meaning : Pupil ’pyuwp
əl student
Pupil ’pyuwp əl
part of the eye
The words pupil ’pyuwp əl and pupil ’pyuwpəl are homonym because
they are words with the same form, and sound pronounciation but different in meaning.
2.4.5 Hyponymy
Hyponymy is the relationship between the meaning of a word of which may be said to be included in that of another word. Palmer 1976:76 states that
“hyponym involves us in the nation of inclusion in the sense”.
For examples: Tulip, rose and jasmine are included in flower Lion,
tiger and elephant are included in animal
The meaning of the word flower is defined as the superordinate, in the sense it is the upper term. Whereas tulip is hyponym of flower, in the sense it is
the lower term. Furthermore, Tulip, rose and jasmine are co-hyponyms of flower, since each is a hyponym of the same lexeme. A tulip is not necessarily
called a tulip flower, since the meaning of the flower has been included in the
meaning of rose.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
2.4.6 Meronymy Meronymy is a part-whole relationship between lexical items. Thus, cover
and page are meronymy of book. This relationship can be illustrated by using sentence frames like X is part of Y, or Y has X, as in A page is part of a book, or
A book has pages. Meronymy reflects hierarchical classifications in the lexicon
somewhat like taxonomic classifications. Meronym differs from hyponym in
transitivity. Not all meronimies are transitive. Hole is a meronym of button and button of shirt, but hole is not a meronym of shirt.
2.5 Relevance Study In additional of review of literature, there have been some analyses that
have ever been done:
Nondang 2007, in her thesis An Analysis of Meaning Relations in Ernest Hemingway’s The Old Man And The Sea. Found types of meaning relations such
as Antonym consist of complementary pairs 24, Gradable pairs 18, Relation pairs 5, Synonym 21, Polysemi 7, Homonym 12, and Hyponym 11.
Margareta 2003. In her thesis An Analysis of Meaning Properties and Meaning Relation Used In Sydney Sheldon’s novel Nothing Last Forever. Has
analyzed the novel Nothing Last Forever, and she found 20 sentences of meaningfulness, 7 sentences of anomaly, 6 sentences of contradictory, 7 lexical
ambiguity, 5 sentences of structural ambiguity, and 6 sentences of redudancy. Meanwhile in meaning relation she found 16 sentences of homonym, 39 sentences
of synonym, 21 sentences of complementary pairs, 16 sentences of gradable pairs, and 6 sentences of relation opposite pairs.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Simbolon 2003, in her thesis An Analysis of Meaning Properties And Relations in Westlife’s Song. Has analyzed Westlife’s Song. In her analysis, she
found 24 sentences of meaningfulness, 8 sentences of anomaly, 4 sentences of contradictory, 7 lexical ambiguity, 3 sructural ambiguity, and 5 sentences of
redudancy. Meanwhile in meaning relation she found 7 sentences of homonym, 13 sentences of synonym, 8 sentences of complementary pairs, 10 sentences of
gradable pairs, and 5 sentences of relation opposite pairs. Sinaga 2005. In his thesis, Types of Meaning and Their Relations in The
Ant And Grasshoper. Found two types of meanings, they are connotative and denotative meanings, and three types of relations, they are synonym, polysemy,
and homonym. And the total number of connotative meaning was 29 and denotative meaning was 23. It means that dominant type of main meaning was
connotative meaning. The total number of synonym was 39, polysemy was 7, and homonym was 5. it means that dominant type of meaning relations was synonym.
In this thesis I conclude that there is similarity between this research and some analyses mentioned above. In terms at types of meaning relations such as
antonym, synonym, polysemy, homonym and hyponym. In this analysis the writer tries to applies palmer’s opinion about meaning relations.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY
3.1 Research Method
I apply the library research to get the data and information in this thesis. According to Nawawi 1993: 30 states that library research is done by collecting
the data from various of literature, in library or other places. Literature used unlimited only at some books, but can also shaped documentation, magazine,
newspaper, etc. Library research is done by reading some books, which are related to the
topic discussed. In order to support the reference and develop the fountain of information, I used internet access, trying to visit website and selected data fit to
the topic discussed.
3.2 Data Collecting Method
Data in this research are sentences containing expressions that have meaning relations found in the novel “ The Color Purple” written by Alice
Walker. And data are collected by reading all sentences containing expressions that have meaning relations found in the novel. Then the data is identified and
classified.
3.3 Population and Sample
Population in this research is 188 sentences containing expressions that have meaning relations. And those sentences become the population in this
Universitas Sumatera Utara