Providing colorful pictures of the mind mapping in group work BKOF and MOT stages
Table 6:
The result of the student’s writing skill in the post and pre-test
Data Pre-Test
Researcher English Teacher
Mean 66.7
68.3 Number of the Students
32 32
From Table 6 , based on the researcher’s assessment, it was found that
the mean of the students’ writing skills was 66.7. Meanwhile, from the English
teacher’s assessment, the mean of the pre-test was 68.3. From those assessments,it could be infe
rred that the students’ writing skills was low because the minimum passing criteria KKMKriteria Ketuntasan Minimum
of English subject in this school was 7.0. In the post test, both the researcher and the English teacher assessed the
s tudents’ writing skills scores by using the same rubric. The result of the
students’ writing scores in the post-test could be seen in Appendix. The summary of the students’ ability in the post-test was presented in Table 6.
Table 7
: The Result of the Students’ Writing Skills in the Post-test
Data Post-Test
Researcher English Teacher
Mean 71.2
71.1 Number of the Students
32 32
Based on Table 7 , from the researcher’s assessment, it was found that
themean of the students’ writing skills was 71.2. Meanwhile, from the English
teacher’s assessment, the mean of the post-test was 71.1. Thus, all of them had passed the minimum passing criteria KKM. From those results, it could be
concl uded that the students’ writing skills had improved since the means of the
students’ writing skills scored both by the researcher and the teacher had improved, from 66,7 and 68,3 in the pre-test, while in the post-test the scores
are 71.2 and 71.1. Chart below shows score of pre-test and post-test.
Table 8: Chart of Pre and Post Test
4. Summary II
Based on the reflection, it could be concluded that the mind mapping and its accompanying activities in Cycle 2 were successful to improve the
students’ writing skill. It was shown by the process of making the mind
10 20
30 40
50 60
70 80
Pre-Test Pots-Test
Chart Title
Researcher English Teacher
mapping especially the activity of producing narrative text using the mind mapping that had been made by the students. It could be seen from the
sentences that were made by the students in their narrative text, most of the students had more vocabulary in writing sentences. Besides, their grammar
was also in the correct form. From the reflection of Cycle 2, it showed that most of the students were able to make narrative text using the mind mapping.
It could be used as the tool to measure whether there was an improvement on students’ writing skill or not. Besides, the researcher found that students were
more enthusiastic in making the mind mapping in Cycle 2. They involved in most of the activities in making the mind mapping.
The researcher and the English teacher agreed that the activities implemented were successful to improve students’ writing skill. Since the
objective of the research was achieved, the researcher and the English teacher agreed to end the research in this cycle.
Here the researcher presents detail information related to the implementation of the mind mapping to improve the students’ writing skill at
MAN Yogyakarta III. The descriptions are presented in the next page.
Table 9: The improvement of the cycles
Before action After cycle I
After cycle II
There were some students who found difficulties to
write sentences in English. Most of the students found it easy
to write sentences in English. Students find it easier to
make English sentences. The students lacked
grammar ability. Some students were able to make
sentences used the simple past tense and made sentences in a
good structure. Almost all students were
able to make sentences used the simple past tense
and made sentence in a good structure.
The students had difficulties to express their ideas in
writing. Some students could generate or
organize their ideas by using the mind mapping.
All students could generate or organize their ideas by
using the mind mapping.
The students lacked vocabulary and used
inappropriate vocabulary in their sentences.
Students’ vocabulary mastery improved. Some students were
able to use appropriate vocabulary in their sentences.
Students’ vocabulary mastery improved. Almost
all students were able to use appropriate vocabulary
in their sentences.
The students’ score average of pre-test is 66.7-66.8
Students’ writing skill improved in the daily meeting.
The students’ score improved. The average of
the post-test is 71.2-71.1.