Topic Steps Learning
Activities correct pictures.
- The teacher and the students discuss the
answers together. f.
Language Focus -
The students listen to the teacher’s explanation about “Past Continuous
Tense”. -
The students enter the “vocabulary time”.
- The teacher uses the media realia to
review the vocabulary that the students have learnt related to “My House”.
- The teacher asks the students to learn
and memorize the vocabulary. g.
Let’s Play a Game
- The teacher asks the students to work in
a group of 4.
- The name of the game is “FIND THE
ROOM, PLEASE?”.
- The teacher explains about the
instructions to the students.
- The students play the game for about 20
minutes. h.
Sum it Up -
The teacher reviews the whole materials briefly.
- The teacher asks the students to make
the reflection about “what have I learnt today?”.
- The teacher closes the lesson.
5. Materials feedback
The feedback was collected from the preliminary field testing. As having stated in chapter 3, the feedback was conducted by analyzing and
evaluating the post design questionnaires 1. The description of the respondents’ background can be seen in the table 4.6 and 4.7.
Table 4.6: The Description of the Students’ Background Respondents
Sex The Student’s Grade in
Elementary School Age in years
F M 4
th
5
th
6
th
9-10 10-11
11 1.
Respondent 1 √
√ 2.
Respondent 2 √
√
Respondents Sex
The Student’s Grade in Elementary School
Age in years F M 4
th
5
th
6
th
9-10 10-11
11 3.
Respondent 3 √
√ 4.
Respondent 4 √
√ 5.
Respondent 5 √
√ 6.
Respondent 6 √
√ 7.
Respondent 7 √
√ 8.
Respondent 8 √
√ 9.
Respondent 9 √
√ 10.
Respondent 10 √
√ 11.
Respondent 11 √
√ 12.
Respondent 12 √
√ 13.
Respondent 13 √
√ 14.
Respondent 14 √
√
Table 4.7: The Description of the English Teacher, the English Instructors, and the Lecturer Background
Respondents Sex Educational
Background Teaching Experiences
in years F M D3 S1 S2 S3 1-10 11-20 21-30 30
English teacher √
√ √
English instructor 1 √
√ √
English instructor 2 √
√ √
Lecturer √
√ √
After the data about the respondents have been gathered and computed, it was found that the results of the designed materials were very encouraging. In the
first part of the questionnaire, the respondents have to choose which degree agreements based on the statements best described their own opinion about the
designed materials. The mean ranged from 3.6 to 4 which meant the designed PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
materials were ready to be implemented, well-designed and also well developed. The mean with 4 points as the degree of agreement indicated the strongest
features of the materials. The designed materials were convinced by the result of the overall evaluation on the detailed result of the first part of the questionnaires
can be seen in the table 4.8 below.
Table 4.8: The result of Post-Design Questionnaires 1 Num Statement
Degree of
Agreement Central Tendency
1 2 3 4 N Mean A. Basic Competence and Learning Indicators
1. The basic competences are
well formulated. 1
3 4
3.75 2.
The learning indicators are well-formulated.
1 3
4 3.75
B. Learning Materials
3. The designed materials are
able to meet the Basic Competence and Learning
Indicators. 4
4 4
4. The topics are well selected
and arranged. 1
3 4
3.75 5.
The contents are relevant to the learners’ need and
interest. 4
4 4
6. The instructions of the
designed materials are clear and understandable.
1 3
4 3.75
7. Generally, the contents are
well-elaborated. 1
3 4
3.75 8.
The learning materials are able to meet the time
allocation for one meeting 4x35’.
1 3
4 3.75
9. Generally. The materials are
variously given and interesting
4 4
4 10.
The activities provided in the designed supplementary
English instructional vocabulary materials will
enable the learners to master English vocabularies.
4 4
4
