Statistical Hypothesis RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

the students from control class. In this class, student who did not pass the minimum score was one student.

2. The Data of Control Class

Table 4.2 The Students’ Scores of Control Class Without Media Pictures Series Students Y Pre Test Score Post Test Score Gain Score Post Test-Pre Test Categorization in Post Test Score 1 58 72 14 Good 2 68 82 14 Excellent 3 59 72 13 Good 4 60 79 19 Good 5 62 76 14 Good 6 59 75 16 Good 7 55 79 24 Good 8 57 79 22 Good 9 57 78 23 Good 10 60 80 20 Excellent 11 67 78 11 Good 12 61 77 16 Good 13 68 80 12 Excellent 14 59 72 13 Good 15 61 82 21 Excellent 16 52 73 21 Good 17 62 72 10 Good 18 58 73 15 Good 19 52 75 23 Good 20 60 72 12 Good 21 59 75 16 Good 22 54 75 21 Good 23 60 79 19 Good 24 61 72 11 Good 25 61 72 11 Good 26 60 80 20 Excellent 27 63 79 16 Good 28 61 73 12 Good 29 59 75 16 Good 30 70 80 10 Excellent 31 61 72 11 Good 32 59 79 20 Good 33 71 82 11 Excellent 34 60 75 15 Good 35 63 78 15 Good 36 71 81 10 Excellent 37 62 75 13 Good 38 61 80 19 Excellent 39 62 79 17 Good ∑ 2373 2987 616 ̅ Mean 60.84

76.58 15.79

Based on the table 4.2 above, it shows that the lowest score in pre-test was 52 and the highest score was 71 with the average of pre-test score was 60.84. Beside that, the average of post-test score increased with the value 76.58. The highest score of post-test was 82 Excellent ; the lowest score was 72 Good . The result of post-test indicated that only 28 students who passed the standard of minimum score of English Subject KKM, and the rest got fewer than 75.

B. Analysis of Data and Hypothesis Testing

1. Analysis of Pre-test and Post-test

Before the writer calculated the value of t test to look at the hypothesis, the writer had to analyze the normality and homogeneity of the data. The examination of normality was needed to know whether the data has been normally distributed. Then, after getting the normality, the next step was calculating the homogeneity of data. It was proposed to look at whether the data is homogeneous or heterogeneous. The writer used the Lyllifors formula to test the normality. In this formula, the data was transformed into the basic value. The maximum dispute T got from the calculation must be in absolute value +. The result of normality can be seen by comparing the value of T max to T table . The criterion of hypothesis is: H 1 : T T table H o : T T table

Dokumen yang terkait

The effectiveness of picture sequence in teaching narrative text writing: a quasi experimental study at the eighth grade students of SMP Islam Al Syukro Universal Ciputat

0 4 90

The Effectiveness of Guided Questions towards Students’ Writing Skill of Descriptive Text

0 5 86

Improving students’ writing skill in narrative text through movies : a classroom action research in the eighth grade students of MTS NEGERI 3 Jakarta

0 5 127

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PICTURE BOOKS IN IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SKILL IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP PGRI Ciputat)

1 18 147

The Effectiveness Of Blog On Students’ Writing Of Narrative Text (A Pre-Experimental Study At Tenth Year Students Of Sman 3 Tangerang Selatan)

0 6 160

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING PICTURE SERIES IN TEACHING WRITING RECOUNT TEXT TO THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF The Effectiveness Of Using Picture Series In Teaching Writing Recount Text To The Tenth Grade Students Of SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Surakarta In 2015/2016

0 6 14

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING PICTURE SERIES IN TEACHING WRITING RECOUNT TEXT TO THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA The Effectiveness Of Using Picture Series In Teaching Writing Recount Text To The Tenth Grade Students Of SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Surakarta In 2015/2

0 4 12

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PEER FEEDBACK TECHNIQUE IN IMPROVING STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXTS.

3 18 38

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING PICTURE SERIES IN TEACHING WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT OF EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP NEGERI 1 NGANTRU IN THE ACADEMICYEAR 20142015

0 0 15

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING PHOTOGRAPH SERIES TO INCREASE STUDENTS' SKILL OF WRITING A REPORT TEXT

0 0 13