The Research Findings

A. The Research Findings

1. The Research Setting

The research was conducted in SMP Negeri3 Hiliduho. The school located in Ombolata Sisarahili village, Hiliduho subdistrict, Nias regency. The school was 25 km from Gunungsitoli town. The school had a headmaster's office, a teacher's office and some classes. The school had a composed atmosphere because it was surrounded by many trees and it was far from disturbance of transportation that supports the teaching learning activity.

The total number of rooms in SMP Negeri 3 Hiliduho are 9 (nine) rooms. There are 6 (six) rooms classes, I (one) library, I (one) teacher'soffic6, and I (one) headmaster’s office. The total numbers of the students were 112 students. In that school, there was a headmaster, 10 teachers, and a staff. Two of them are the English teacher. All the persons who worked in that schools were very friendly and kindness with the researcher.

The subject of the research was the Eighth Grade of SMP Negeri 3 Hiliduho especially class VIII-A. The total numbers of the students were 30 students. In conducting the research, the researcher started in the middle of August 2A1.6 by asking permission of headmaster's agreement first. In conducting the research, the researcher was helped by the English teacher of SMP Negeri 3 Hiliduho as observer of the

researcher's and the students' activities during conducting the research in the classroom in order to get the valid result of the research.

2. The Explanation of Each Cycle

To increase the students' ability in increasing the students' ability in speaking skill through Chain Drill Technique, the researcher did it in two cycles. Each cycles consisted of two meetings.

a. Cycle I

Cycle I consisted of two meetings. The time allocation of every meeting was 2x40 minutes. Both of meetings were conducted at the Eighth grade of SMP Negeri 3 Hiliduho especially class VIII-A, with the total numbers of the students were 30 students and all of the students were present at the time. The first meeting was

conducted on Saturday 27 th August 2016 and the second meeting also was conducted on Monday 29 th August 2016. Clearly, the result of the research in Cycle I it could be

seen in explanation of every meeting as follows.

1) First Meeting

The material was taught by the researcher to the students in the first meeting was about asking and giving opinion. The time allocation used was 2x40 minutes. The

meeting was conducted on Saturday 27 th August 2016. The procedures of this meeting could be viewed in some steps as follows.

a) Planning

In this step the researcher found the syllabus, prepared lesson plan, the teaching material, evaluation sheet, observation sheet of the students' and the researcher's

activities, attendance list of the students and camera to take the students' and the researcher performance during conducting the research.

b) Action

After planning, the researcher conducted the action in the classroom. The researcher entered the classroom together with the teacher-collaborator. Then the teacher-collaborator gave the chance to the researcher to start the activities based on the procedures in lesson plan.

Firstly, the researcher greeted the students and asked their condition, while the teacher-collaborator took a sit next of the door to observe the researcher's and the students' activities during the teaching-learning process. Concisely, the researcher started to conduct the action by introducing her self to the students and the purpose to enter that classroom. This action headed for making a good relation to the students. After that, the researcher checked the students' attendance list and the students raised the right hand when the researcher was calling the students' name one by one. This action conferred several profits for the researcher to know the names, faces, genders, and the entire numbers of the students. All the students. at the time were present.

Furthermore, the researcher introduced the material to the students. The topic of the material was asking and giving opinion. For making the good atmosphere in teaching material, the researcher asked the students' prior knowledge about the material. Then, the researcher clarified the real definition, the expression of asking and giving opinion and gave the example in order that the students could understand it clearly.

After that, the researcher asked the students to read the several expressions of asking and giving opinion, and then the researcher guides them in speaking by using Chain Drill Technique. During conducted the activity, the researcher allows some controlled communication, even though it is limited. Then, the researcher began the conversation by greeting a particular student or asked them a question. After the first students respond, then turns to the students 2 sitting next to her/him. After student 2 responds, then she/he turns to the student 3 or asked a question or offers a greeting. After student 3 responds, she/he turns to the students sitting next to her/him until all the class had participating in speaking.

After guided the students in speaking by using Chain Drill Technique, the researcher gave the improvement on the students' mistake and their limitation in responding a chain during conducted Chain Drill Technique. The next, action is the researcher asked the students in pairs to practice asking and giving opinion by using things arround them. And then the researcher concludes the material and gave motivation to the students. After that the researcher closed the class by greeted the students.

c) Observation

The observation was conducted by the teacher-collaborator (English teacher) during the researcher performed the action in the classroom. The teacher-collaborator observed all the happened in the classroom which involved the students' and the researcher's activities during the teaching-learning activity conducted.

Related to the observation sheet of the students' activities, the researcher found some weaknesses in the first meeting of Cycle I, as written on the next page.

1. Some of the students did not respond the researcher greeting or question when the researcher applied Chain Drill Technique.

2. Some of the students did not able to offer a greeting or asked a question to the students sitting next to her/him.

3. Some of the students did not pay attention to the researcher's explanation about the material and the technique.

4. Some of the students did not follow the researcher instruction in practice the expression of asking and giving opinion. Besides that, the researcher found some advantages during the teaching-

learning process in the first meeting of Cycle I, as follows.

1. All the students were present at the time.

2. Some of the students are active to follow the instruction of the researcher when applied Chain Drill Technique.

3. Some of the students were seriously in following teaching learning process.

d) Reflection

In the first meeting of Cycle I, the researcher did not have enough time to evaluate the students' ability in speaking skill. In this step, the researcher only noted and analyzed the result of the observation. From the notes of the observation sheet and field notes, the researcher should do some improvements in the next meeting, as follows.

1. The researcher should ask the students to memorize some words in order that it

makes them easy in telling the words when getting the English subject

2. The researcher should explain clearly the instruction to avoid the students' confusion.

5. The researcher should give suggestion to the students in order that the student could

work cooperatively.

4. The researcher should motivate the students in pronouncing the English word well.

5. The researcher should prepared her self better than before in teaching the students.

2) Second Meeting

The meeting was performed on Monday 29s August 2016. The time allocation used was 2x40 minutes. The certain topic of the material was asking and giving opinion. The procedures of the second meeting in Cycle I is explained bellow.

a) Planning

In planning phase, the researcher prepared; lesson plan, evaluation sheet, observation sheet of the students' and the researcher's activity and the teaching material.

b) Action

After planning, the researcher continued the research in the classroom. The and greeted the students. The researcher was accompanied by the teacher-collaborator. The teacher-collaborator took a sit in the next of the door to observe the entire researcher's and the students' activities during the teaching-learning process. After that, the researcher checked the students' attendance list. Reality, all the students were present at the time.

Furthermore, the researcher reviewed and reminded the students about the last material and gave the short explanation about the material and the technique. After that, the researcher gave the oral test to the students to evaluate the students' ability in speaking skill. In conducted the test, the researcher recorded all the students' performance in pairs.

The next action, the researcher made the decision with the students result. Then the researcher gave time to the students to asked some question. after that the researcher improves the students' weakness during conducting the test. Because the time was offers, the researcher conclude the lesson and greeted the students.

c) Observation

The observation was done by the teacher-collaborator during implemented the action in the classroom. Based on the result of the observation, the researcher found some weaknesses in the second meeting of Cycle I, as follows.

1) Some of the students could not give opinion to the researcher's question about the last material.

2) Some of the students did not respond a question of asking and giving opinion.

3) Some of the students did not able to convese the dialogue.

4) Some of the students did not able to ask many question because of their limited in vocabulary.

5) Some of the students are still lazy to bring the dictionary.

Besides that, the researcher found a few advantages during conducting the second meeting of Cycle I, as written on the next page.

1) All the students were present at the time.

2) Most of the students are brave to conducted the test although during conducting the test there were someone controlled communication.

3) Most of the students were interested to respond a question of asking and giving opinion, although their vocabulary is limited.

4) Some of the students are interested in responding the researcher's questions in English. Related to the result of the observation, the researcher obtained the data about

done and undone activities both of the students' and the researcher's activities during implemented the action in the classroom. Clearly, the result of students' activities could

be seen in Table 4 as follows.

TABLE 4

THE STUDENTS'ANDTHE RESEARCHER'SACTIVITIES IN TI{E SECOND MEETING OF CYCLE I

No Cycle

Activities

Criteria

Frequency Percentage (%)

1. I Activities

Undone

Researcher’s

Done

Activities

Undone

Based on the result of the observation in the table above, the researcher inferred that the students' activities in the second meeting of Cycle I was classified in "Enough" level. It showed that most of activities have done by the students. Then, the researchers' activities was classified in "Good Level". It caused by there are some

TABLE 5

THE STUDENTS'ABILITY IN SPEAKING SKILL BY USING CHAIN DRILL TECHNIQUE AT THE EIGHTH GRADE (VIII.A) OF SMP NEGERI

3 HILIDUHO IN THE SECOND MEETING OF CYCLE I

No (o/o) Level Scoring Frequency Percentage

I Fail

5. Very Good

Based on the elaboration result of the students' ability in increasing the students' ability in speaking skill through Chain Drill Technique, it could be classified in "Enough Level". It was showed that there were 2 students (6.67%) classified in "fail" level. There were 8 students (26.67%) classified in "less level". There were 10 students (33.33%) classified in "enough" level, there w6re 5 students (16.670/o) classified in “good level" and there were 5 students (16.67%) classified in “very good level".

From-the.-elaboration result of the table above, there were 20 students whose value > Minimum Competence Criterion (MCC). And there were 10 students whose value s Minimum Competence Criterion (MCC). The average of the students' value was

59.7. Therefore, the researcher concluded that the students still were unable to increase the speaking skill in asking and giving opinion.

The real result ca The real result can be viewed in Graphic II below.

3 Hiliduho. The total The total numbers of the students were 30 students and students and all of them were present at the time. The certain topic of the teaching material in C nt at the time. The certain topic of the teaching material in Cycle II was asking nt at the time. The certain topic of the teaching material in Cycle II was asking and giving opinion. Clearl Clearly, the researcher gave the explanations about explanations about the activities that was done by the researcher in each meeting of Cycle II, as follows. done by the researcher in each meeting of Cycle II, as follows. done by the researcher in each meeting of Cycle II, as follows.

1) First meeting

The first meeting first meeting was performed on Saturday 03Th September September 2016. The procedures of this meeting could be viewed in some S procedures of this meeting could be viewed in some Steps, as follows. ps, as follows.

a) Re-planning

To conduct the research in the first meeting of Cycle II, the researcher re- arranged the lesson plan, prepared the teaching material, the observation sheet of the students' and the researcher's activities, attendance list of the students in order the research done well, and camera to take the students' and the researcher' performance during conducting the research.

b) Action

After planning, the researcher conducted the action in the classroom. The researcher entered the classroom together with the teacher-collaborator. Then the teacher-collaborator gave the chance to the researcher to start the activities based on the procedures in lesson plan.

Firstly, the researcher greeted the students and asked their condition, while the teacher-collaborator took a sit next of the door to observe the researcher's and the students' activities during the teaching-learning process. After that, the researcher checked the students' attendance list and the students raised the right hand when the researcher was calling the students' name one by one. This action conferred several profits for the researcher to know the names, faces, genders, and the entire numbers of the students. All the students at the time were present.

Furthermore, the researcher introduced the material to the students. The topic of the material was asking and giving opinion. For making the good atmosphere in teaching material, the researcher asked the students' prior knowledge about the material. Then, the researcher clarified the real definition, the expression of asking and

giving opinion and gave the example in order that the students could understand it clearly.

After that, the researcher asked the students to read the several expressions of asking and giving opinion, and then the researcher guides them in speaking by using Chain Drill Technique. During conducted the activity, the researcher allows some controlled communication, even though it is limited. Then, the researcher began the conversation by greeted a particular student or asked them a question: After the first students respond, then turns to the students 2 sitting next to her/trim. After student 2 responds, then she/he turns to the student 3 or asked a question or offers a greeting. After student 3 responds, she/he turns to the students sitting next to her/him until all the class had participating in speaking.

After guided the students in speaking by using Chain Drill Technique, the researcher gave the improvement on the students' mistake and their limitation in responding a chain during conducted Chain Drill Technique. The next action is the researcher asked the students in pairs to practice asking and giving opinion by using things arround them. And then the researcher concludes the material and gave motivation to the students. After that the researcher closed the class by greeted the students.

c) Observation

The observation was done by the teacher-collaborator during the researcher was implementing the action in the classroom. The teacher-collaborator observed all of the activities happen in the teaching-learning process; included the researcher's and

students' activities. Some weaknesses of the students were found during the teaching- learning process, as follows:

l. Some of the students did not following the researcher explanation.

2. Some of the students were still shy in giving respond by using English. Besides that, the researcher found some advantages during the teaching-learning process in the first meeting of Cycle II, as follows.

1. Almost the students are brave to perform their conversation in from of the class.

2. All the students followed the instructions from the researcher when applied Chain Drill Technique.

3. Some of the students were motivate in participating to responds their friends questions.

d) Reflection

In this meeting the researcher does not have enough time to evaluate the students' ability. Based on the result of the two pieces of the observation sheet, the researcher still found the weakness in Cycle II at the first meeting. Therefore, the researcher has done some improvement in the next meeting, such as:

l. The researcher asked the students to pay attention to the researcher's explanation.

2. The researcher motivates the students to practice in pronouncing the English

word at home.

3. The researcher has to use the time efficiently.

2) Second Meeting

The second meeting was performed on Monday 10ft September 2016 with the time allocation used was 2x40 minutes. The certain topic of the material was asking and giving opinion. The procedures of the research in the second meeting, as follows.

a) Planning

Before the researcher entered and conducted the research in the classroom, the researcher prepared; lesson plan, evaluation sheet, observation sheet of the students' and the researcher's activities, and camera to record all the students performance during teaching-learning process.

b) Action

After planning, the researcher continued the research in the classroom. The researcher entered the classroom and greeted the students. The researcher was accompanied by the teacher-collaborator. The teacher*collaborator took a sit in the next of the door to observe the entire researcher's and the students' activities during the teaching-learning process. After that, the researcher checked the students' attendance list. Reality, all the students were present at the time. Furthermore, the researcher reviewed and reminded the students about the last material and gave the short explanation about the material and the technique. After that, the researcher gave the oral test to the students to evaluate the students' ability in speaking skill. In conducted the test, the researcher recorded all the students' performance in pairs.

The next action, the researcher made the decision with the students result. Then the researcher gave time to the students to asked some question. after that the researcher

improves the students' weakness during conducting the test. Because the time was offers, the researcher conclude the lesson and greeted the students.

c) Observation

The result of observation paper both of the researcher and students during the teaching-learning process, as follows . The weaknesses were found in this meeting of Cycle [I was some students still Felt shy in responding the question from their friend. Even though, some strength was

Found in this meeting of Cycle II, as follows:

1) All the students were present.

2) The students did the test seriously.

3) The students were able to follow Chain Drill Technique that the researcher applied.

4) The researcher could control the class well.

5) The researcher had a good preparation in teaching. Related to the result of the observation, the researcher obtained the data about done and undone activities both of the students' and the researcher's activities during implemented the action in the classroom. Clearly, the result of students' activities could

be seen in Table 6 as written on the next page

TABLE 6

THE STUDENTS'AND THE RESEARCHER'S ACTIVITIES IN THE SECOND MEETING OF CYCLE II

Cycle Meeting

Activities

Criteria

Frequency Percentage (%)

Researcher’s

Done

- Based on the result of the observation in the table in above, the researcher inferred that the students' activities in the second meeting of Cycle I was classified in "Very Good Level". It showed that almost the activities had done by the students. Then, the researchers' activities was classified in "Very Good Level". It show that all the activities have done by the researcher,

Undone

The real result can be seen in Graphic III bellow. 100

Excellent Graphic III: The students' and the researcher activities in the second meeting

Cycle I

of Cycle II

In the second meeting second meeting of Cycle II, the researcher paid attention paid attention to the all of the students' activities, noted activities, noted the result of observation, analyzed the result analyzed the result of observation, and evaluated the result the result of observation. Finally, the researcher evaluated researcher evaluated the students' ability in speaking skill speaking skill by applying oral test. The result of the students' the students' test could be elaborated in Tab1e7 as follows. elaborated in Tab1e7 a

TABLE 7

THE STUDENTS' ABILITY IN SPEAKING SKILL BY USING CHAIN DRILL ABILITY IN SPEAKING SKILL BY USING CHAIN DRILL ABILITY IN SPEAKING SKILL BY USING CHAIN DRILL TECHNIQUE AT THE EIGHTH GRADE (VIII.A) OF SMP NEGERI TECHNIQUE AT THE EIGHTH GRADE (VIII.A) OF SMP NEGERI

3 HILIDUHO IN THE SECOND MEETING OF CYCLE II 3 HILIDUHO IN THE SECOND MEETING OF CYCLE II CYCLE II

No. Level Level

Scoring

Frequency

Perce Percentage

1. Fail Fail

0-39

2 Less Less

40-59

3. Enough Enoug

60-74

4. Good Good

75-84

5. Very ery Good

12 40% Total Total

85-100

30 100% The real result could be viewed The real result could be viewed in Graphic IV below.

First meeting

Second meeting Active

Cooperative

Graphic IV : The result of the students' ability in speaking skill by using Chain Drill Technique at the eighth grade of SMP Negeri 3 Hiliduho (VIII- A)in the second meeting of cycle II.

Based on the result of observation sheet of the researcher's and the students' activities, the researcher does not found the weakness in applying the procedure in teaching-learning process. The researcher found all of the activities are done well. Then the researcher concludes that the researcher has full preparation before teaching the students in the classroom at the time.

d) Reflection

In this phase, the researcher evaluates the result of the students' ability in speaking skill. Based on the result of the observation, the researcher concluded that Chain Drill Technique was able to increase the students' ability in speaking skill. It Could be seen on the average of the students' value that could be achieved Minimum Competence Criterion (MCC) that has been specified. The average of the students' ability was 80.07. Therefore, the researcher concluded that the students of the Eighth Grade-(VIII-A) of SMP Negeri 3 Hiliduho were able to achieve the MCC and the research is stopped

3. The Students' Activities for All Cycles

From the obtained data, the researcher concluded that the students' activities from the first meeting of Cycle I until the second meeting of Cycle II have increased. In the first meeting of Cycle I, there were22 students (73.33%) who did the activities and there were 8 students (26.67%) who did not do the activities. Meanwhile in the second meeting of Cycle I, there were 24 students (80%) who did the activities and there were 6 students (20o/o) who did not do the activities.

Furthermore, in the first meeting of Cycle II, there were 27 students OA%) who did the activities and there were 3 students (10%) who did not do the activities. Meanwhile in the second meeting of Cycle II, there were 28 students (93.337o) who did the activities and there were 2 students (6.67%) who did not do the activities. The entire students' activities can be viewed in Table 8 bellow.

TABLE 8 THE STUDENTS'ACTIVITIESOF ALL CYCLES

1. I Undone

6 Students

2. II Done

4. The Researcher's Activities for All Cycles

From the obtained data in the first meeting of Cycle I, there were 15 activities (75%) done by the researcher and there were 5 activities (25%) undone by the researcher. Meanwhile in the second meeting of Cycle I, there were l0 activities (76.92%) done by the researcher and there were 3 activities (23.08%) undone by the researcher.

Furthermore, in the first meeting of Cycle II, there were 18 activities (80%) done by the researcher and there were 2 activity (10%) undone by the researcher. Meanwhile in the second meeting of Cycle II, all of the activities had been done by the researcher.

The entire researcher's activities and students' result can be viewed in Table 9 below.

TABLE 9 THE RESEARCHER'S ACTIVITIES OF ALL CYCLES

1. I Undone

3 activities

2. II Done

5. The Students' Ability in Speaking Skill by Using Chain Drill Technique for AII Cycles

From the result of evaluation sheet, the researcher would elaborate the students' ability in speaking skill from Cycle I until Cycle II. In the second meeting of Cycle I, there were 5 students (16.67%) classified in “very good level". There were 5 students (16.67%) classified in "good" level. There were 10 students (33.33%) classified in "enough" level. There were 8 students Q6.67yA classified in "less" level From the result of evaluation sheet, the researcher would elaborate the students' ability in speaking skill from Cycle I until Cycle II. In the second meeting of Cycle I, there were 5 students (16.67%) classified in “very good level". There were 5 students (16.67%) classified in "good" level. There were 10 students (33.33%) classified in "enough" level. There were 8 students Q6.67yA classified in "less" level

Furthermore, in the second meeting of Cycle II, there were 12 students (40%) classified in the “very good" level. There were 9 students (30%) classified in the good" level and there were 9 (30o/o) student classified in the "enough" level. There were no students in "less" and "fail" level. In addition, the average of the students' value in speaking skill was 80.07. It showed that the students' ability of SMP Negeri

3 Hiliduho in speaking skill has been increased and achieved Minimum Competence Criterion (MCC) that has been specified. In other words, the application of Chain Drill Technique in the second meeting of Cycle II was successful. The result can be viewed in Table l0 bellow .

TABLE 10 THE STUDENTS' ABILITY IN SPEAKING SKILL THROUGH

CHAIN DRILL TECHNIQUE FOR ALL CYCLES

No. Cycle

1. I Enough

good

Very Good

2. II Enough

Very Good