The third one is sincerity condition. In terms of directive, it is described as that speaker wants hearer to do asserted actions 1969:66.
The last one is essential rule. Searle regarded it as counts as attempt to get hearer to do action 1969:66.
2.2.5. Context and Co-text
In this fourth subchapter, I will describe three sub explanations: i context, and ii co-text. The people need to concern with these terms when they investigate the
meaning of the text.
2.2.5.1. Context
In terms of context, Halliday stated three features of the context: a the field of discourse, b the tenor of discourse, c the mode of discourse 1985:10.
The first feature is the field of discourse. It refers to topic that has some interpretations: i what is thing of the social action that is happening, and ii
what are main components that the participants are talking. The second feature is the tenor of discourse. It refers to participants that
have some interpretations: i people who exist in the social action, ii the relationships among the people who exist in the social action temporary
relationship and permanent relationship, iii the type of speech role that the participants apply in the dialogue, and iv the type of speech role that the
participants apply in the whole conversation.
The last one is the mode of discourse. It refers to some components: a the symbolic organization of the text written or spoken or both of them, b
the text status as language act, c function of the text spoken or written, and d rhetorical mode what is being reached by the text.
2.2.5.2. Co-text
In this sub explanation, I will describe some components a the definition of co-text, and b the co-textual relation coherence.
The definition of co-text is regarded as the first component that needs explanations. Widdowson considers co-text as the pattern of lingustic elements
within a text 2007:41. This pattern indicates the connections among the previous texts and the other texts.
The second component is the co-textual relation. In the case of relations, Halliday explained that there is a set of linguistic resources that is regarded as
coherence of a text. It means the representation of connection among one part of a text to the other texts 1985:48.
2.2.6. Theory of Meaning Orders by Kittay 1987