Table 4.2: Survey Result on the Aims of the Textbook
Item Statement
Strongly Disagree
Disagree Agree Strongly
Agree Mean
SD
2. The aims of
the textbook correspond the
core of the competence.
16.7 66.7
16.7 3
0.594
4. The aims of
the textbook correspond
closely with the needs of
learners. 27.8
66.7 5.6
2.76 0.545
However, teachers and material developers must carefully see that the mean of item number 4 namely the aims of the textbook correspond closely with the needs
of leaners is not that high. It is only 2.76 a little higher than 2. In other words, 27.8 of the respondents disagreed to the statement. Therefore, to determine whether each
statement in this criterion is factually confirmed, the researcher needs to look at the results of the next criteria and the actual evidence found by reading closely to
textbook and contrasting them with what the survey results are. Therefore, the researcher will elaborate each statement at the discussion section of this chapter.
3. The aims of 0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3
0.594 the textbook
correspond closely with
the aim of the teaching
program.
1. The aims of 0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.11
0.582 the textbook
correspond closely with
the aim of curriculum.
2. The Approach
The second aspect to measure is the approach of textbook. There are seven statements to measure this criterion. See table 4.3. It can be clearly said that
respondents agreed that textbook is suited to the learning situation. However as a researcher, it is important to analyze it deeply. Based on the survey, the score of this
statement is 2.7. It means the textbook suited to the learning situation. Respondents see that textbook is effectively suited to the learning situation although the score is
low. It is a survey research, therefore teachers ’ statement towards this topic cannot be
proven empirically since the researcher did not conduct observation to see how effective and judge whether or not the aim of textbook is suited to the learning
situation. The second statement is seen as effective one by the respondents. It means
that respondents agree that textbook is suited to the teaching situation. However, the number of agreement to this statement is absolute which means some other
respondents see that textbook is not suited to the teaching situation. Remarkably, most respondents disagree to the third statement. The Mean is
2.23 See table 4.3. Respondents did not agree that textbook covers most of all student needs since it does not reach 2.5. Another negative result happens at the fourth
statement. Respondents did not agree that textbook is a good learning resource for student. But the value of the disagreement is low. It is 2.47.
Most teachers agreed that textbook does not cover all students’ need
Diagram. For sure it is not easy to facilitate all students need. However, at least a PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI