Research Type DESIGNING COMMUNICATIVE SUPPLEMENTARY GRAMMAR TASKS FOR 8TH RADE STUDENTS OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL.

grammar, their lacks of grammar, their wants about learning grammar, input for learning grammar, the setting of learning grammar, the procedure, learner role, and teacher role. The type of the questions was in form of close-ended questions. Meanwhile, the third questionnaire was used for expert judgment. This questionnaire was used in order to examine the developed materials. The questionnaire was given to an expert of materials designer in this case was a lecturer.

E. Data Analysis Technique

All questionnaires that were used to gather data in this study produced quantitative data. The quantitative data from the needs analysis questionnaires were analyzed by calculating the percentage of each answer on the questionnaires by following the formula proposed by Sugiyono 2009: 144 below. Where: P : Percentage f : Frequency n : Total number of respondents 100 : Fixed number There were two types of questions in the needs analysis questionnaires. They were choosing from answers list and sequencing the answers. The three highest percentages answers of choosing from answers list would be used in this study. Meanwhile, answers that were placed as option number 1, 2, and 3 from the sequencing questions would also be used by the researcher. P = � � 100 Meanwhile, the quantitative data from the third questionnaire which were materials evaluation were analyzed using descriptive statistics through the use of Mean by using a formula proposed by Suharto 2008: 14 as follows: Where : Mn : Mean fx : Total score N : Total number of the data In classifying the category of the mean, theory proposed by Suharto 2006: 52-53 about quantitative data was used. Where : R : Range Xt : Highest score Xr : Lowest score The range obtained from the calculation of the formula above was 0.75. The conversion was presented below. Table 4: The Quantitative Data Conversion Scale Descriptive Categories Interval 1 Poor 1  x  1.74 2 Fair 1.75  x  2.24 3 Good 2.25  x  3.24 4 Very Good 3.25  x  4

F. Research Procedure

This study used an R D cycle presented by Borg and Gall 1989. However, the model was modified by selecting only some steps which were Mn = �� � R = ��−�� 4

Dokumen yang terkait

An Analysis On Primary School Students’ Ability To Use Personal Pronouns. A Case Study On The Sixth Year Students Of Sdn No. 101878 Tg. Morawa.

6 42 55

An Analysis On High School Students’ Ability To Master Passive Voice A Study Case : The Second Year Students At SMK Negeri 2 Pematangsiantar

1 73 52

ENGLISH TASKS FOR COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE DEVELOPMENT: A CONTENT English Tasks For Communicative Competence Development: A Content Analysis Of When English Rings A Bell For Junior High School Based On Curriculum 2013.

0 2 17

Developing Materials of an EFL Reading Courseware Prototype for 8th Grade Students of Junior High School.

0 0 41

Designing supplementary speaking materials using experiential learning for the tenth grade students of senior high school.

0 5 239

Designing a set of English supplementary instructional reading materials using short comics for the first year students of Junior High School.

0 2 155

Designing a set of supplementary instructional grammar materials for the first year students [cawu I] of the Junior High School.

0 0 155

Designing a set of supplementary grammar materials for the first year students of the junior high school based on the 1994 english curriculum.

0 1 305

Designing a set of communicative grammar tasks for the first year SMU students as a supplementary material for the english for senior high school book 1.

0 0 156

DEVELOPING TASK-BASED SUPPLEMENTARY ENGLISH READING MATERRIALS FOR GRADE VII STUDENTS OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL.

1 1 351