InformationOverload.ppt 3025KB Jun 23 2011 10:24:58 AM

Research Foundation

Generational Communication
Differences Around the Globe
Jan Thibodeau, ABC
Chair, Research Foundation

Agenda
• Study Overview
• AHAs and SO WHATs
– Engagement
– Importance & Effectiveness
of Employer Communication
– Channel Preferences
– Ratings of Employer
Communications

• NOW WHAT? - Roundtable
Discussions
• Sharing


2

Study Overview
• Commissioned by the IABC Research Foundation
• Sponsored by Deloitte Consulting LLP
• Conducted by Mathew Greenwald & Associates, Inc.

• Preliminary report of findings
• Final report and publication due later this year

3

Study Purpose
• Compare two age cohorts in today’s global
workforce to understand preferences, needs, habits
and attitudes regarding workplace communications
– Ages 20-26 (Generation Y or Millennials in the US)
– Ages 50-59 (Baby Boomers in the US)

4


Study Design
• Online survey
• Six countries: Brazil, Canada,
China, India, United Kingdom,
United States
• 600 participants: 50 of each age
cohort in each country
• March 17 – April 17, 2008
• English or native language
(Portuguese, French, Mandarin or
Hindi)

5

Engagement
• What differences exist in how
each age cohort thinks about
their job, their benefits and
work environment and their

organization’s management?
• How are the age cohorts
different in three job loyalty
measures:
– overall job satisfaction
– intention to remain with current
employer
– willingness to recommend
employer to others?

6

Engagement
• Younger: more positive about most factors, especially opportunities to
learn and grow
– Younger: 72% strongly agree or agree
– Older: 54% strongly agree or agree

• Both age cohorts: being proud to work for an employer is one of two
leading drivers of overall satisfaction

• Other driver
– Younger: feeling a sense of belonging
– Older: trusting leaders to consider employees’ best interests

• Younger group was more positive about being proud to work for their
employer than the older group (63% vs. 54%)
• Younger group was more likely to be willing to recommend their
employer to a job seeker (86% vs. 75%)

7

Engagement Implications
• Are older workers aware of development
opportunities in your organization?
• Are both younger and older workers proud to work
for your organization?
– Fulfills social responsibilities
– Inspires trust in leadership
– Provides learning and development opportunities


• Is your organization’s reputation a factor in attracting
and retaining employees?

8

Importance & Effectiveness
of Employer Communication
• What are the most important types of communication
for each age cohort?
• How effectively are
employers performing in
each type of
communication?
• Where are the biggest
gaps between
communication
importance and
effectiveness for each
age cohort?
9


Importance & Effectiveness
of Employer Communication
• Both groups: most important types of employer
communications
– Performance recognition
– Feedback about job performance
– Opportunities to interact with fellow employees

• Younger group: place more value on informal communication
and fun ways to build teamwork
• Older group: place more value on official/formal sources of
information
– Explanation of organizational goals and policies
– How company is doing

10

Importance & Effectiveness Implications
• How do your organization’s communication strategies

facilitate:
– Performance recognition
– Feedback about job performance
– Opportunities to interact with fellow employees

• What communication programs/strategies are in place to
foster informal communication and fun ways to build
teamwork?
• How does your organization communicate
– Organizational goals and policies
– How company is doing

11

Channel Preferences
• What are the communication
channel preferences for
receiving information about







Benefits
Company goals & performance
Company events
Business/industry news
Project/team updates

• And for…
– Interacting w/co-workers
– Having routine exchanges
w/supervisor

12

Channel Preferences
• Channel preferences vary by type of communication
– No sweeping channel preferences that fit each age group


• Both age groups: preference for in-person
interaction with co-workers to build working
relationships
• Younger, high users of technology
are more likely to see electronic
messaging (e-mail, instant or
text messaging) as an effective
way to build relationships

13

Channel Preferences Implications
• How do you determine which channels to use
when communicating various types of
information?
– Are you using multiple channels?

• What communication practices do you have in
place to foster in-person interaction with coworkers to build working relationships?

– Younger users – are there opportunities for e-messaging
and is it accepted cultural practice?

14

Ratings of Employer Communications
• How do the age cohorts rate employer
communications to employees for their:






credibility
relevance
understandability
timeliness
explanations of the information’s importance


15

Ratings of Employer Communications
• Both age groups: majority gave positive ratings for
all five attributes tested
• Older age group: lower ratings than younger on
credibility
– Older age group were three times more likely to rate
employer’s communications as not credible
• Older workers with no management or supervisory role were the most
critical
• Gap between age groups was greatest in public sector and those in
consumer/industrial products

16

Ratings Implications
• How are you measuring the communications
credibility factor in your organization?
• How does your organization ensure that the
communication is credible, especially for older, nonsupervisory workers?

17

Review of Key Findings


Both age groups:
– Engagement: Being proud to work for an employer is one of two leading
drivers of overall satisfaction
– Channels: Preference for in-person interaction with co-workers to build
working relationships



Younger group:
– Communication Importance & Effectiveness: Places more value on
informal communication and fun ways to build teamwork
– Channels: Is more likely to use electronic messaging as an effective way to
build relationships (high technology users)



Older group:
– Communication Importance & Effectiveness: Places more value on
official/formal sources of information
– Ratings of Communication: Lower ratings on communication credibility

18

Now What?
• What do these findings mean
to communications in your
workplace?
• What might you continue,
start or stop doing?
• What might you do
differently?

19

Final Report
• Lots more details for
each of the four areas
• Findings by
– Geographical location
– Industry
– High and low technology
users

• Watch for the research
later this year!

20

Dokumen yang terkait

AN ALIS IS YU RID IS PUT USAN BE B AS DAL AM P E RKAR A TIND AK P IDA NA P E NY E RTA AN M E L AK U K A N P R AK T IK K E DO K T E RA N YA NG M E N G A K IB ATK AN M ATINYA P AS IE N ( PUT USA N N O MOR: 9 0/PID.B /2011/ PN.MD O)

0 82 16

ANALISIS FAKTOR YANGMEMPENGARUHI FERTILITAS PASANGAN USIA SUBUR DI DESA SEMBORO KECAMATAN SEMBORO KABUPATEN JEMBER TAHUN 2011

2 53 20

KONSTRUKSI MEDIA TENTANG KETERLIBATAN POLITISI PARTAI DEMOKRAT ANAS URBANINGRUM PADA KASUS KORUPSI PROYEK PEMBANGUNAN KOMPLEK OLAHRAGA DI BUKIT HAMBALANG (Analisis Wacana Koran Harian Pagi Surya edisi 9-12, 16, 18 dan 23 Februari 2013 )

64 565 20

FAKTOR – FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI PENYERAPAN TENAGA KERJA INDUSTRI PENGOLAHAN BESAR DAN MENENGAH PADA TINGKAT KABUPATEN / KOTA DI JAWA TIMUR TAHUN 2006 - 2011

1 35 26

A DISCOURSE ANALYSIS ON “SPA: REGAIN BALANCE OF YOUR INNER AND OUTER BEAUTY” IN THE JAKARTA POST ON 4 MARCH 2011

9 161 13

Pengaruh kualitas aktiva produktif dan non performing financing terhadap return on asset perbankan syariah (Studi Pada 3 Bank Umum Syariah Tahun 2011 – 2014)

6 101 0

Pengaruh pemahaman fiqh muamalat mahasiswa terhadap keputusan membeli produk fashion palsu (study pada mahasiswa angkatan 2011 & 2012 prodi muamalat fakultas syariah dan hukum UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta)

0 22 0

Pendidikan Agama Islam Untuk Kelas 3 SD Kelas 3 Suyanto Suyoto 2011

4 108 178

PP 23 TAHUN 2010 TENTANG KEGIATAN USAHA

2 51 76

KOORDINASI OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN (OJK) DENGAN LEMBAGA PENJAMIN SIMPANAN (LPS) DAN BANK INDONESIA (BI) DALAM UPAYA PENANGANAN BANK BERMASALAH BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG RI NOMOR 21 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN

3 32 52