PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NO 382K/PDT.SUS/2012 TENTANG SENGKETA MEREK ANTARA SOPHIE MARTIN TRADE AND INVESTMENT.LTD MELAWAN JAFRI YAURI DIKAITKAN DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO 15 TAHUN 2001.
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
NUMBER 382K/PDT.SUS/2012 REGARDING MARK DISPUTE
BETWEEN SOPHIE MARTIN TRADE AND INVESTMENT.LTD WITH
JAFRI YAURI LINKED WITH LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
NUMBER 15 OF 2001 ON MARKS
ABSTRACT
Law issue about intellectual Property Rights become increasely
widespread all over Indonesia, one of them is about brand or trademark
dispute. One brand or trademark tend to have similar trait with another
brand, and as the result it confuse consumers and also can damage the
reputation of the product because of the alleged deception of one brand
(passing off action). Although it had been protected by the laws, the
passing off cases still frequently occur. As instance is the passing off case
of the famous “SOPHIE MARTIN” brand. Sophie Martin Trade and
Investment.ltd as the owner of the brand “SOPHIE MARTIN” filed a lawsuit
about the cancellation of the “SOPHIE” brand which belongs to JafriYauri
at Commercial Court in Central Jakarta District Court, by considering the
alleged of base similarity and passing off action that claim the brand. The
decision of the Commercial Court state that the lawsuit was rejected. As
the next step, Sophie Martin Trade and Investment.ltd filed the petition of
cassation which later was approved by the Supreme Court Judges. In its
decision, state that the petition of cassation was granted and automatically
canceled
the
decision
of
the
Commercial
Court
number
89/Merek/2011/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst.
This study case use juridical normative method and description analysis
for the research specification, that describe and analiyze the provisions
that related with the decision of Commercial Court in Central Jakarta
District Court number 89/Merek/2011/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst and Supreme
Courtno.382K/PDT.SUS/2012.
According to the analysis, it is obtained the conclusion that, the
consideration of Supreme Court Decision number 382K/PDT.SUS/2012,
which state that “SOPHIE” brand have a similar fundamental traits with
“SOPHIE MARTIN” brand and also proved to perform the passing off
action towards “SOPHIE MARTIN” brand, is a right decision. Based on
Pasal 6 Law of The Republic of Indonesi Number 15 of 2001 on marks
and its explanations.
v
ABSTRAK
PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NO
382K/PDT.SUS/2012 TENTANG SENGKETA MEREK ANTARA SOPHIE
MARTIN TRADE AND INVESTMENT.LTD DENGAN JAFRI YAURI
DIKAITKAN DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 15 TAHUN 2001
TENTANG MEREK
Devia Octaviani
110110090010
Permasalahan hukum tentang Hak Kekayaan Intelektual semakin
berkembang luas di Indonesia salah satunya adalah masalah sengketa
merek. Suatu merek dagang terkadang memiliki persamaan dengan
merek dagang lainnya, sehingga selain berakibat tidak saja
membingungkan konsumen, namun juga dapat merusak reputasi merek
dagang suatu produk karena adanya tindakan pemboncengan terhadap
merek orang lain. Salah satu contoh kasus pemboncengan merek adalah
kasus pemboncengan merek terkenal “SOPHIE MARTIN”. Sophie Martin
Trade and Investment.ltd selaku pemilik merek “SOPHIE MARTIN”
mengajukan gugatan pembatalan merek “SOPHIE” milik Jafri Yauri pada
tahun 2011 di Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat karena dianggap memiliki
persamaan pada pokoknya dan adanya tindakan pemboncengan merek.
Putusan Pengadilan Niaga menyatakan bahwa gugatan ditolak. Kemudian
Sophie Martin Trade and Investment.ltd mengajukan Permohonan Kasasi
yang kemudian dikabulkan dan membatalkan Putusan Pengadilan Niaga
No.89/Merek/2011/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst.
Studi kasus ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normative dan
spesifikasi penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif analitis yang
menggambarkan dan menganalisis ketentuan-ketentuan yang berkaitan
dengan Putusan Pengadilan Niaga pada Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusa
tNomor 89/Merek/2011/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst dan Putusan Mahkamah Agung
No.382K/PDT.SUS/2012.
Berdasarkan analisis diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa Pertimbangan Putusan
Mahkamah Agung No 382K/PDT.SUS/2012 yang menyatakan bahwa
merek “SOPHIE” memiliki persamaan pada pokoknya dengan merek
“SOPHIE MARTIN” dan telah terbukti melakukan tindakan pemboncengan
terhadap merek “SOPHIE MARTIN” yang sudah terkenal adalah tepat,
berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 6 Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2001
Tentang Merek dan penjelasannya.
iv
iv
NUMBER 382K/PDT.SUS/2012 REGARDING MARK DISPUTE
BETWEEN SOPHIE MARTIN TRADE AND INVESTMENT.LTD WITH
JAFRI YAURI LINKED WITH LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
NUMBER 15 OF 2001 ON MARKS
ABSTRACT
Law issue about intellectual Property Rights become increasely
widespread all over Indonesia, one of them is about brand or trademark
dispute. One brand or trademark tend to have similar trait with another
brand, and as the result it confuse consumers and also can damage the
reputation of the product because of the alleged deception of one brand
(passing off action). Although it had been protected by the laws, the
passing off cases still frequently occur. As instance is the passing off case
of the famous “SOPHIE MARTIN” brand. Sophie Martin Trade and
Investment.ltd as the owner of the brand “SOPHIE MARTIN” filed a lawsuit
about the cancellation of the “SOPHIE” brand which belongs to JafriYauri
at Commercial Court in Central Jakarta District Court, by considering the
alleged of base similarity and passing off action that claim the brand. The
decision of the Commercial Court state that the lawsuit was rejected. As
the next step, Sophie Martin Trade and Investment.ltd filed the petition of
cassation which later was approved by the Supreme Court Judges. In its
decision, state that the petition of cassation was granted and automatically
canceled
the
decision
of
the
Commercial
Court
number
89/Merek/2011/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst.
This study case use juridical normative method and description analysis
for the research specification, that describe and analiyze the provisions
that related with the decision of Commercial Court in Central Jakarta
District Court number 89/Merek/2011/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst and Supreme
Courtno.382K/PDT.SUS/2012.
According to the analysis, it is obtained the conclusion that, the
consideration of Supreme Court Decision number 382K/PDT.SUS/2012,
which state that “SOPHIE” brand have a similar fundamental traits with
“SOPHIE MARTIN” brand and also proved to perform the passing off
action towards “SOPHIE MARTIN” brand, is a right decision. Based on
Pasal 6 Law of The Republic of Indonesi Number 15 of 2001 on marks
and its explanations.
v
ABSTRAK
PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NO
382K/PDT.SUS/2012 TENTANG SENGKETA MEREK ANTARA SOPHIE
MARTIN TRADE AND INVESTMENT.LTD DENGAN JAFRI YAURI
DIKAITKAN DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 15 TAHUN 2001
TENTANG MEREK
Devia Octaviani
110110090010
Permasalahan hukum tentang Hak Kekayaan Intelektual semakin
berkembang luas di Indonesia salah satunya adalah masalah sengketa
merek. Suatu merek dagang terkadang memiliki persamaan dengan
merek dagang lainnya, sehingga selain berakibat tidak saja
membingungkan konsumen, namun juga dapat merusak reputasi merek
dagang suatu produk karena adanya tindakan pemboncengan terhadap
merek orang lain. Salah satu contoh kasus pemboncengan merek adalah
kasus pemboncengan merek terkenal “SOPHIE MARTIN”. Sophie Martin
Trade and Investment.ltd selaku pemilik merek “SOPHIE MARTIN”
mengajukan gugatan pembatalan merek “SOPHIE” milik Jafri Yauri pada
tahun 2011 di Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat karena dianggap memiliki
persamaan pada pokoknya dan adanya tindakan pemboncengan merek.
Putusan Pengadilan Niaga menyatakan bahwa gugatan ditolak. Kemudian
Sophie Martin Trade and Investment.ltd mengajukan Permohonan Kasasi
yang kemudian dikabulkan dan membatalkan Putusan Pengadilan Niaga
No.89/Merek/2011/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst.
Studi kasus ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normative dan
spesifikasi penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif analitis yang
menggambarkan dan menganalisis ketentuan-ketentuan yang berkaitan
dengan Putusan Pengadilan Niaga pada Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusa
tNomor 89/Merek/2011/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst dan Putusan Mahkamah Agung
No.382K/PDT.SUS/2012.
Berdasarkan analisis diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa Pertimbangan Putusan
Mahkamah Agung No 382K/PDT.SUS/2012 yang menyatakan bahwa
merek “SOPHIE” memiliki persamaan pada pokoknya dengan merek
“SOPHIE MARTIN” dan telah terbukti melakukan tindakan pemboncengan
terhadap merek “SOPHIE MARTIN” yang sudah terkenal adalah tepat,
berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 6 Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2001
Tentang Merek dan penjelasannya.
iv
iv