An Analysis On Unit Shift In The Translation Of “Oogy, The Dog Only A Family Could Love” Into “Oogy, Anjing Buruk Rupa Yang Setia Menemani Perjalanan Suka Dan Duka Sebuah Keluarga”
AN ANALYSIS ON UNIT SHIFT IN THE TRANSLATION OF “OOGY, THE
DOG ONLY A FAMILY COULD LOVE” INTO “OOGY, ANJING BURUK
RUPA YANG SETIA MENEMANI PERJALANAN SUKA DAN DUKA
SEBUAH KELUARGA”.A THESIS BY FITRIYAWATI BR SEMBIRING REG. NO. 120721001 DEPARTEMENT OF ENGLISH FACULTY OF CULTURAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF SUMATERA UTARA MEDAN 2014
AN ANALYSIS ON UNIT SHIFT IN THE TRANSLATION OF “OOGY, THE
DOG ONLY A FAMILY COULD LOVE” INTO “OOGY, ANJING BURUK
RUPA YANG SETIA MENEMANI PERJALANAN SUKA DAN DUKA
SEBUAH KELUARGA”.A THESIS BY: FITRIYAWATI BR SEMBIRING REG. NO: 120721001 SUPERVISOR CO-SUPERVISOR Dr. H. Muhizar Muchtar, M. S Drs. Marzaini Manday, MSPD NIP. 19541117 1980003 1 002 NIP. 19570322 198602 1 002
Submitted to Faculty of Cultural Studies University of Sumatera Utara Medan
in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Sarjana Sastra from
Department of English. DEPARTEMENT OF ENGLISH FACULTY OF CULTURAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF SUMATERA UTARA MEDAN 2014
Approved by the Department of English, Faculty of Cultural Studies University
of Sumatera Utara (USU) Medan as thesis for The Sarjana Sastra Examination.
Head, Secretary,
Dr. H. MuhizarMuchtar, MS. RahmadsyahRangkuti, MA. Ph.D NIP. 19541117 198003 1 002 NIP. 19750209 200812 1 002 Accepted by the Board of Examiners in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Sarjana Sastra from the Department of English, Faculty of Cultural Studies University of Sumatera Utara, Medan.
The examination is held in Department of English Faculty of Cultural Studies University of Sumatera Utara on Saturday, August 9, 2014.
The Dean of Faculty of Cultural Studies University of Sumatera Utara Dr. H. Syahron Lubis, MA NIP. 19511013 197603 1 001 Board of Examiners:
Sign 1. Dr. H. Muhizar Muchtar, M.S
Nip 19541117 1980003 1 002 2. Rahmadsyah Rangkuti, MA. Ph.D
Nip 19750209 200812 1 002 3. Dr. H. Syahron Lubis, M.A
Nip 19511013 198003 1 002 4. Drs. Umar Mono, Dipl. Trans, M.Hum
Nip 19600122 198601 1 001 5. Drs. H. Chairul Husni, M.Ed. TESOL
Nip 19570308 198404 1 004
AUTHOR’S DECLARATION I, FITRIYAWATI BR SEMBIRING, declare that I am the sole author of this thesis
Except where reference is made in the text of thesis, this thesis contains no material published elsewhere or extracted in whole or in part of a thesis by which I have qualified for awarded another degree.
No other person’s work has been used without due acknowledgement in the main text of this thesis. This thesis has not been submitted for the award of another degree in any tertiary education.
Signed :
th
Date : on 9 August 2014
Name : Fitriyawati Br Sembiring Title of thesis : An analysis on unit shift in the translation of “Oogy, the dog only a family could love” into “Oogy, anjing buruk rupa yang setia menemani perjalanan suka dan duka sebua keluarga. Qualification : S-1 / Sarjana Sastra Departement : English Literature I am willing that the writer’s thesis should be available for reproduction at the discretion of librarian of the University of Sumatera Utara on the understanding the user are made aware of their obligation under the law of the Republic of Indonesia.
Signed :
th
Date : on 9 August 2014
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First of all, I would like to thank to my Almighty Allah SWT, who gives me health and capability in completing this thesis.
I address my gratitude to some lecturer who helped and guided me in writing this thesis:
- Dr. H. Syahron Lubis, M.A, as the Dean of Faculty of Literature USU
- Dr. H. Muhizar Muchtar, M.S, as the Head of English department and
Rahmadsyah Rangkuti, MA, Ph.D, as the Secretary
- Dr. H. Muhizar Muchtar, as my supervisor and Drs. Marzaini Manday, MSPD, as my co-supervisor who give the precious time on guidance, motivations, criticisms and supporting ideas in completing this thesis. I also thank my beloved parents, Mansur Pelawi and Frida Irianti br Bangun who love, supports and prays me with all their time. And I thank to my only brother Frima Hajirin S.sos for support and understanding me to write this thesis.
I do not forget to thank my lovely friends, Siti Andriani Amd, Julia Rosa Amd, Siska Pintasari Amd, who always accompany me in sad and happy time.
The last, hopefully, this thesis will be useful for everyone who read it.
Medan, August 2014 Fitriyawati Br Sembiring Reg. No. 120721001
ABSTRAK
Skripsi ini berjudul “An Analysis on unit shift in translation of Oogy, The Dog Only a Family Could Love into Oogy, Anjing Buruk Rupa yang Setia Menemani Perjalanan Suka dan Duka Sebuah Keluarga”. Skripsi ini menganalisis tentang pergeseran unit yang terjadi pada penerjemahan teks bahasa sumber dari sebuah novel karya Larry Levin berjudul Oogy, the dog only a family could love ke dalam teks bahasa sasaran berjudul Oogy, anjing buruk rupa yang setia menemani perjalanan suka dan duka sebuah keluarga yang diterjemahkan oleh Marie Elvire. Teori yang mengidentifikasikan pergeseran tersebut adalah teori Caford tahun 1965 yang menjelaskan tentang pembagian pergeseran.Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode deskriptif kualitatif dan konten analisis.Data diperoleh dari novel bahasa Inggris yang diterjemahkan ke dalam bahasa Indonesia.Ada pun metode dalam pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah metode kepustakaan.Kemudian untuk mencari pergeseran unit yang paling sering digunakan dalam novel terjemahan digunakanlah formula dari Malo. Dari analisis yang telah dilakukan terdapat 102 pergeseran unit dengan 2 jenis pergeseran tataran, yaitu 101 pergeseran frase ke klausa atau 99,02% dan 1 pergeseran klausa ke frasa atau 0,98%. Dari analisis ini, diketahui bahwa pergeseran unit shift yang paling dominan terjadi dalam pengalihbahasaan novel tersebut adalah pergeseran dari frasa ke klausa.
Kata kunci: penerjemahan, pergeseran unit, frasa dan klausa
ABSTRACT
The title of this thesis is “An Analysis on Unit Shift in Translation of Oogy, the Dog Only a Family Could Love. This thesis analyzed the unit shift occurred in the translation of “Oogy, the Dog Only a Family Could Love” a novel by Larry Levin into Bahasa Indonesia as “Oogy, Anjing Buruk Rupa yang Setia Menemani Perjalanan Suka dan Duka Sebuah Keluarga” by Maria Elvire. The theory used in identifying the shift in this qualitative study was the one developed by Catford in 1965 explaing about the division of shifts. The data for this study were obtained from the original novel written in English and the translated version written in Bahasa Indonesia. The data for this study were selected through purposive sampling method because not all of the data available were analyzed. Malo formula was used to find the most commonly used unit shifts in the translated version of the novel. The result of analysis showed that there were 102 unit shifts with two types of level shifts, namely, 101 shifts (99, 02%) fom phrase to clause and 1 shifts (0, 98%) from clause to phrase. From the result of this analysis, it was find out that the most dominant unit shift occurred in the translating the novel was the shift from phrase to clause.
Key: translation, unit shift, phrase and clause
TABLE OF CONTENTS
AUTHOR’S DECLARATION ...................................................................................... i
COPYRIGHT DECLARATION .................................................................................. ii
ACKNOLEDGEMENTS ... ......................................................................................... iii
ABSTRAK ........................... ......................................................................................... iv
ABSTRACT ......................... ......................................................................................... v
TABLE OF CONTENTS .... ......................................................................................... vi
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................... viii
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the study .................................................................. 1
1.2 Problem of the Study .. ..................................................................... 4
1.3 Objective of the Study ..................................................................... 4
1.4 Scope of the Study ..... ..................................................................... 5
1.5 Significance of the study .................................................................. 5
CHAPTER II: REVIEW OF LITERATURE
2.1 Definitions of Translation ................................................................ 6
2.2 Functions of Translation .................................................................. 8
2.3 Process of Translation ...................................................................... 8
2.4 Types of Translation ....................................................................... 10
2.5 Shifts in Translation ........................................................................ 11
2.5.1 Level Shifts .................................................................................. 12
2.5.2 Category Shifts ............................................................................. 12
2.5.2.1 Structure Shifts .......................................................................... 17
2.5.2.2 Class Shifts ................................................................................ 17
2.5.2.3 Unit Shifts ................................................................................. 18
2.5.2.4 Intra System Shifts .................................................................... 18
CHAPTER III: METHOD OF RESEARCH
3.1 Research Method . ........................................................................... 19
3.2 Data and Data Source ...................................................................... 19
3.3 Data Collecting Method .................................................................. 19
3.4 Data Analysis Method ..................................................................... 20
CHAPTER IV: ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
4.1 Data Analysis .................................................................................. 23
4.2 Data Findings .................................................................................. 48
CHAPTER V: CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
5.1 Conclusions ..................................................................................... 51
5.2 Suggestions ..................................................................................... 51
REFERENCES ........................ ..................................................................................... 52
SL : Source Language TL : Target Language P-C : Phrase to Clause C-P : Clause to Phrase