2. Interview
An interview is conducted to obtain information by actually talking to the subject Selinger and Shahomy, 1989: 166. In other words, an interview was a
sense of oral questionnaire. In this research, the researcher conducted an interview to the English teacher as the interviewee in the pre-design survey to get further
information about the students’ needs and interests, which was not covered in the first questionnaire.
D. Data Gathering Technique
For gathering the data, the researcher distributed two kinds of questionnaires and conduct an interview. The first questionnaires were distributed
to the eleventh grade students of tourism department of SMK Karya Rini YHI Kowani to know the students’ needs and interests. To complete the data in the pre-
design survey, the researcher also interviewed the English teacher of eleventh grade of tourism department. All the data gathered was used to design the
speaking materials. After designing the materials, the researcher distributed the second questionnares to the English teachers. The second questionnaire aimed to
gain judgment, evaluation, and suggestion from the English teachers. The feedback both from the English teachers would be the basis for making the final
revision of the designed speaking materials.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Table 3.2 The Whole Process of Data Collecting Instruments Respondents Data
Gathered Time
Questionnaire The eleventh grade students of tourism department of
SMK Karya Rini YHI Kowani The students’ needs
and interests. June 2011
Interview The English teacher of
eleventh grade of tourism department
The learning processes in the
classroom. June 2011
Questionnaire Two English teachers of SMK Karya Rini YHI Kowani
The teacher’s opinion on the
designed materials. July 2011
E. Data Analysis Technique
The data was attained from the questionnaire and interview. The first questionnaire was distributed to the eleventh grade students of tourism department
of SMK Karya Rini YHI Kowani containing some data about the students’ interests in learning speaking, the topics and activities they were interested in, and
difficulties they got in learning speaking.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
The data from the questionnaire was calculated using this following formula:
N = x 100 Note:
N : The percentage of expected opinion from the students x
: The number of students who choose a certain answer n
: the total number of the students
The next data was gathered from the second questionnaire. It contained the teachers’ personal opinions about the topics by presenting a set of statements
and asking the respondents to poin out those statements whether they were strongly agree, agree, uncertain, disagree, strongly disagree Ary et al., 2002:
224. The five points of agreement which were used to assess the respondents opinion will be presented as follows:
Table 3.3 Points of Agreement on the Designed Materials Points of Agreement
Meaning
1 Strongly Agree
2 Agree 3 Uncertain
4 Disagree 5 Strongly
Disagree
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
The data was analyzed to find out the average of all scores in a distribution namely mean. The mean was found by adding all the scores and
dividing by the number of the respondents. The respondents’ opinions on the designed materials were presented in the table below.
Table 3.4 The Results of the Second Questionnaire Blank
No Statements Frequency of the Point
of Agreement N
Central Tendency
1 2 3 4 5 Mn
The average points or means are calculated using this formula: =
∑
Note: : the average point
∑ : the sum of all scores n : the number of respondents
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
F. Research Procedures