35. --- Messy --- Moody
--- Mumbles --- Manipulative
36. --- Slow --- Stubborn
--- Show-off --- Skeptical
37. --- Loner --- Lord over others --- Lazy
--- Loud 38. --- Sluggish
--- Suspicious --- Short-tempered
--- Scatterbrained 39. --- Revengeful
--- Restless --- Reluctant
--- Rash 40. ---Compromising --- Critical
--- Crafty --- Changeable
The questionnaire has 40 numbers. Every number of items consists of traits from the four personality types. To do the test the students were asked to choose
some traits which reflect themselves. The students were asked to put a check list v to the four traits options on
entirely items numbers. The answer represents their traits that fit them best. Then the check list test paper that have been done by the students are matched to the
indicators table above. For example: Number 1
C Adventurous
P Adaptable
V S Animated
M Analytical Each symbol means:
C : is for Choleric
S : is for Sanguine
M : is for Melancholic
P : is for Phlegmatic
By seeing the checklist, the students answer “animated” for items number 1. It means the item number 1 will be counted as sanguine students. The same way is
applied to the next numbers until the last one. The way of personality judgment is by seeing the highest result that appears
on the total questions.
E. Technique of the Data Analysis
First of all, the students were given questionnaire to determine students’
personality types, and then calculate the speaking score of both personalities with statistic count. The two groups; the sanguine and phlegmatic students and each
score of English speaking are clearly distributed as the single data distribution into two tables.
Because the research is non-experimental research, it used data information to measure the hypotheses, and the result will explain how the results either support
or refuse the hypothesis or answer the research question.
In this research the writer used the formula:
Mean of Variable X1
∑
Mean of Variable X2
∑
Standard Deviation of Variable XI S
=
√
∑
Standard Deviation of Variable X2
S =
√
∑
t-
test
√
Note:
X
1 =
The total scores of sanguine students X
2 =
The total scores of phlegmatic students N
1 =
The number of sanguine students N
2 =
The number of phlegmatic students
1 =
Mean of sanguine students
2 =
Mean of phlegmatic students S
1 =
Standard deviation of sanguine students S
2 =
Standard deviation of phlegmatic students t
o =
t- test
F. Statistical Hypotheses
Significant critical value: 0.05 and 0.01 Criteria :
If t
o
t-
table
means there is influence and Ha is accepted, while Ho is rejected.
If t
o
t-
table
means there is no influence and Ha is rejected, while Ho is accepted.
The Hypotheses of the research describes how the research must be answered. Ho = There is no significantly difference between sanguine and phlegmatic
student s’ on their achievement in speaking score.
Ha = There is significantly differencesbetween sanguine and phlegmatic students’ on their achievement in speaking score.
23
CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDINGS AND INTERPRETATION
This chapter consists of the data description, the data analysis, the data interpretation and the statistic interpretation.
A. Research Findings
1. Data Description
The following two tables are the students who have been categorized into the sanguine and the phlegmatic personality. They were sample which had been
chosen by purposive sampling and the following are their En glish speaking score taken from English Education Department.
Table 4.1 The Sanguine Students
The Seventh Semester of English Education Department No
Name Speaking Score
1 Student 1
80.00 2
Student 2 70.40
3 Student 3
68.00 4
Student 4 80.00
5 Student 5
73.40 6
Student 6 71.80
7 Student 7
75.70 8
Student 8 76.00
9 Student 9
70.70 10
Student 10 70.70
11 Student 11
76.00 12
Student 12 78.50
13 Student 13
78.20 14
Student 14 80.00
No Name
Speaking Score
15 Student 15
80.90 16
Student 16 72.70
17 Student 17
80.00 18
Student 18 78.30
19 Student 19
77.70 20
Student 20 77.80
21 Student 21
80.00
Table 4.2 The Phlegmatic Students
The Seventh Semester of English Education Department No
Name Speaking Score
1 Students 1
74.40 2
Students 2 70.00
3 Students 3
80.30 4
Students 4 75.30
5 Students 5
80.00 6
Students 6 70.10
7 Students 7
74.70 8
Students 8 71.20
9 Students 9
70.60 10
Students 10 71.50
11 Students 11
80.00 12
Students 12 70.40
13 Students 13
74.50 14
Students 14 74.50
15 Students 15
72.10 16
Students 16 73.10
17 Students 17
78.80
